Hey, I don't mind handing history2b his ass, he's a poor representation of a Lakers fan. Or, maybe a typical bandwagon type from post Gasol trade, whatever. But there is supposed to be an intelligent Spurs fan, ambchang that is really self-destructing. We have gone round and round for two months, I proved he fails at reading comprehension and didn't even know what we were discussing. He keeps bringing the thread I whipped him in back, this the one about Shaq saying Tim getting a 5th ring would bug him more than Kobe already having 5. And he's accusing me of wanting to get the last word! He keeps bumping it and is pissing everyone off. I just laugh at him there but now he's back to his old tricks, proving he can't read and is getting owned in your Russell overrated thread. Could you PM the guy and tell him he's being dumb and should give it up? I hate to keep sticking it to a Spurs fan on a Spurs board. Just doesn't seem right. Thanks
Here: http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...=165109&page=6
what thread? Usually I like to keep out of other people's fights, but if I can read it and see what I can add that is neutral, I will when I have time.
I'm a Libertarian, as well. Care to throw your two cents into the debate I'm having with Kool? Don't care whose side you're on, but I'm interested in your opinion.
Registered as decline to state with Libertarian leanings. My basic belief is instead of tossing out one party (as last night) every 2 years, elect all independents. The entire house can be replaced, 1/3 of the senate, and every 4 years, the executive branch. now, all these new Green's, Libertarians. Peace and freedoms, John Birch's, and so on form a coalition. they agree to help each other pass their party's legislation. Give them 2 years, they can't mess the country up, and probably would help it. If they do fail, bring back the repubs and dems, who will be licking their wounds and hopefully, better politicians. However, my scenario will never happen. We are like sheep, we follow the leader instead of becoming leaders. I love to argue politics, I get more long winded than when talking sports!
We'll see if he responds. Not sure of your political leanings, but did you enjoy my wreckage of Koolaid_Man? He simply does not know how to construct a coherent argument.
history2b is historynow. No way can he recover from my last post. If he tries, he'll get slaughtered again. Don't know how you plan to judge who won the debate by making the better case; a poll, or whatever, but he has made a poor case for Bill. What counts in any case is everyone's opinion of Bill and the other greats and where to rank them. My new signature gives my take.
Made a Bill Russell thread for you and history to have good spirited debate.
History called you out in my Duncan/2nd option thread as not knowing anything about basketball.
