DMC
Got Woke?

Hopkins towers over every film he's in. In Thor he was so far above the rest as Odin, he didn't even belong in the film.

I had to stop watching. It's that stupid and boring.

Be cool for inspecting roofs and scouting for redfish on the flats.

Yes, I was asked. No one asked you though because no one values your opinion.

Donetsk Don proselytizing and gas lighting with propaganda.

Jesus saved Chumpy, and Chumpy will never forgive him.

Up next, a die-in in front of the SC. Green and blue haired fat chicks and their metrosexual friend zone hangouts laying down with pillows under their shirts and a clothes hanger stuck up their cooch.

It's weird that he doesn't look before posting it and think "no that's fucking stupid" like everyone else does when they read it. He has to be on the spectrum.

The governor didn't drown.

OK Slingblade. Some people call it a Kaiser blade, you call it a slingblade mmmm hmmm

Again, the bottom line is that California cannot ask "why do you need a gun?" This is a big deal. It shows California AG getting ahead of the lawsuits if someone was denied because their reason to carry didn't meet the threshold of the authority having jurisdiction.

Mono after reading that: :lol

Just words, are you triggered by them?

We also don't need noobs getting bent over by experienced world leaders. Somewhere in the middle would be good, a person with experience with the military who has political leadership skills and is savvy about global politics.

You wanted to call an embryo a virus because, like I said, you've been pussy whipped into going HAM for anything a woman tells you to go HAM about. Now Roe V Wade is about how much of an undesirable, almost evil presence a baby inside a womb is.

:lol

To remain consistent, it needs to be pointed out when grammar Nazi makes a mistake. Then again, no one asked you.

You're using your speculation as to how the authorities having jurisdiction will consider (or alter their consideration of) good moral character. That's not noteworthy enough to even debate. As it stands, "why do you need it" is no longer a question they can ask. If they want to go to arbitrary...

Of course I read it. I am the one who cited it :lol You're responding to a claim I never made. I said "there's not a single CHL holder in California" to which you responded "That's a feature, not a bug". That's why I said SCOTUS said no. I know the AG's decision was to not require cause to...

People voted in record numbers because they didn't have to leave home to vote.

You know she gets preggers a lot.

Still no point mentioned.

Except I didn't say either. I said they aren't afraid of a gun.

:lol

Yeah Irving is one of the best ball handlers in the league, if not the best. If he could get his head right he'd be up pretty high in the top 10 active players.

You said any teacher can. It's not a "shall issue" situation. I'm sure you have no idea what that even means. It's up to the district, not to the teacher. A teacher cannot simply acquire a CHL and carry the firearm. They have to be approved by the district. There's no requirement to do so.

So what was the point? You miss almost every point of a post on the regular but somehow your post of an anecdote didn't have the point that teachers carrying is a bad idea?

Afraid of a gun, meaning a gun, not a shooter. There's a difference between a gun and a shooter with a gun. The discussion is about teachers carrying guns.