Sup scrah ... at first it looked like it. The House Bill was really gonna neuter the statute and make it more of a traditional SLAPP law by tying protected activity pretty close to first amendment issues. I took a glance at the enrolled version a couple weeks ago and it looked like they rolled those changes back. Arguably, I think the text really isn’t that much different, but I think trial courts are pretty hungover on this shit and will construe the statute narrowly. There was a blue wave of democratic judges on the courts of appeal, so they may limit the statute too since they don’t wanna pour out plaintiffs. So it really depends on what SCOTEX does. Pretty impressive but about the msj you got granted. You looking to get into this shitstain career field?
We had a case where we got a sanction of over 90k (they sued a guy for filing suit, blatant shit) on this shit and our fees, so the other side ended up shelling out like 135k. For us drafting a 15 page motion. So I'm sad to see this bitch go.
All common sense - prob didn't go far enough since there's some wiggle room with the "based on or in response to" language still being left in. Just hate to see a cash cow that led to all kinds of ridiculous shit go away. I used this shit to fuck with people and it was glorious.
Matt Patricia
Bro, don't forget to stop by this thread and wish Kawhi Leonard a happy birthday! http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...9412&p=9066995
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...=1#post9067359 Chris actually believes this.
rofl yeah, which redneck was that?
Sup scrah, solve any cool math problems lately tbh
Yeah watching with the family today. Got plans for the SB after they beat these Yinzer fucksticks?
Both, tbh. I use Bovada.
Believe.
I'm not the rat!
12+5=GOAT
www.YouTube.com/ClubSpurs
I smell a rat
You must be the other guy
Find latest posts