DMC
Got Woke?

RIP all. Sucks to be in a situation in life where the geography lottery had you born in a shithole country and all your efforts to get away from it amount to dying in sweltering heat with dozens of others in the back of a semi truck.

There are words in English to show you're making a deduction instead of simply issuing a statement of fact. You should have asked your wife.

Wouldn't he be able to sue the school for lost wages and violation of his constitutional rights by wrongful termination?

He said so :lmao

Then why change anything? Why not wait for someone to point out NY?

I don't know about conversely, but additionally, perhaps. Equal protection would still be on the table if two people with similar background were treated differently in legal decisions because of the whims of the official. Judges do it all the time but they aren't using moral characteristics and...

btw, instead of double posting, just task kill when prompted to reload the page.

It started here. You said SCOTUS said "we know best" is legal, but "we know best" was about showing need, not about moral character. I even said Texas has basically the same moral character requirement only in more defined terms. You said "that's a feature not a bug". If you didn't mean that's...

So then in an effort to abide by SCOTUS ruling in NY, California would prompt groups to sue again by moving the goalpost, voluntarily.

"ventriloquism" and ESP

Stupid constitution, always in the way of real progress.

If you can show that someone was denied a CHL based on double standards, you could probably sue based on equal protection.

Where did you illustrate California wishes to have the same issue level as they have now?

Seems you were actually just saying it's a nothingburger, and using the ability of sheriffs' and chiefs' to apply more rigorous filters to moral character requirements for applicants they want to dismiss. You're considering "legal" to be above "constitutional", even though this entire thread...

You mean like you talking about me, unprompted?

You're saying their desire is to have the same outcome regardless, and you've done nothing to illustrate that as truth.

No, you're special. You're beyond reproach for sure. Surely God has a purpose for you, you must sense it.

:lol The hits keep rolling in. When the left goes too far someone has to bring them back inline.

Keep up the good fight. One day you'll be rewarded, maybe by a backpage mention on Rawstory.

:lol David still spouting off non-stop, hoping someone, anyone, hears his feeble cry from his bedroom. :lmao

It's your claim. You explain it. When the spotlight hits the crumb snatcher, said snatcher retreats into its hole. Again, how would they fight it?

Why would you need to say anything when no one here asked for your opinion? You called it inconsequential then balked when called on to explain. This should show anyone who wonders what your IQ level really is and how invested you are in doing anything here other than chasing me around with your...

#winning

Those precious dudes on the left with the confused looking kid :lol I thought the tweet said "kept a fantastic street gang from.." and I thought "were they fabulous?"

"there's a reason CA AD didn't fight the ruling" SCOTUS ruling.. who are they going to go to, the uber Supreme Court of Legends? :lol

You called it inconsequential, you explain it. :lol expecting "I said so" to float here.

Dishonest hubris from someone who's triggered easily. :lol

Notable that your entire presence here is one of interjection since you're never really asked for your actual opinion otherwise. You weren't asked this time either, for the record.

YOU do not eat a booger on LIVE TV

Probably about where you are now, stuck in whataboutism instead of addressing the current point.