ElNono
🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆

Your sarcasm detector was off

Well, a similar research puts it at 10%. Even if we're generous and cut in the middle, that would put it at 55%, and that's without taking into account that crime rate has decreased substantially in the last few decades...

log out immediately

MLB the show was the first announced, IIRC.

yep

If he dies, he dies

anything could be a bar mitzvah, tbh... too vague

Is there a conservative perspective on climate change? Outright denial is not a perspective (can't discuss a problem if there's no problem). Maybe that's what she meant by not being available.

Let me open another can of worms: The notion that positing a theory requires 'faith' is completely incorrect, and also falls squarely outside of the scientific method. A theory is quite simply an attempt to rationally explain a phenomenon that is otherwise unknown, including testable methods or...

Well, that's shitty. Glad it worked out for you, but yeah, plenty of stupid people on the interwebs.

No, really, I didn't say any of the bolded. I was very precise in what I said, which you clearly don't want to touch (otherwise you would have), because you know what I said is empirically correct. However, the bolded does show what you tell yourself to justify that dichotomy, and that's certainly...

Not sure what you mean. I was referring to the other candidates, be it from the GOP or Dems. Obviously, that means after he entered the race.

You really shouldn't be pointing fingers and calling other people delusional when you have faith in an invisible man in the sky, tbh... at the very least, it's irrational, which is the very definition of delusion. Glad you're doing well, and your kids too, but that really has nothing to do with...

Nobody liked Trump. That doesn't mean much, tbh

Gonna back up my fake news claim: https://www.journalgazette.net/news/fact-check/20180510/do-98-percent-of-mass-public-shootings-happen-in-gun-free-zones

fake news. back it up.

Neither will D'Souza or Qhris

I never claimed Parnas was good, that's an unfounded inference. He's very likely guilty as hell of what he's been accused of. That, however, is the point: considering he's in the middle of a criminal case, and all these items can be used as evidence against him, fabricating evidence doesn't...

That's exactly the claim. Do you even read what you post, retard?

Are you talking about Kasich being anything remotely close to Shillary? They're nothing alike.

I mean in the sense that while Bernie seemingly did lose fair and square, we also got to know the DNC was all in for Shillary. Bernie did get cucked, then went ahead and supported Shillary anyways. As far as Cruz, well, we all know how low Trump went with him, then the next thing we see, is...

:lmao