-
Re: Spot Number 9 - Top 50 Spurs
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Joe Schmoogins
How many chips did Silas help win? Bowen? Yeah, Bowen deserves it.
Well, just run down the rosters of the championship years in order by rings won, then. In fact, go scratch Ice, since he has zero rings.
-
Re: Spot Number 9 - Top 50 Spurs
Quote:
Originally Posted by
exstatic
Well, just run down the rosters of the championship years in order by rings won, then. In fact, go scratch Ice, since he has zero rings.
:tu
So then we can put Andrew Gaze up there now
-
Re: Spot Number 9 - Top 50 Spurs
-
Re: Spot Number 9 - Top 50 Spurs
-
Re: Spot Number 9 - Top 50 Spurs
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Joe Schmoogins
How many chips did Silas help win? Bowen? Yeah, Bowen deserves it.
chips?
Its spelled "Championship" not "Championchip"
Besides, by that logic: Gerard King>George Gervin :bang
-
Re: Spot Number 9 - Top 50 Spurs
Larry Kenon should be even ahead of Elliott. He had the better overall stats. 20 point scorer and good rebounder 10+ per game with the spurs and shares the nba record for steals in a game. A solid player on both sides of the court unlike Bowen.
Kenon was also an important player on the team that entered the NBA. Had the spurs not had a great team during the merger they would not have made it into the NBA. Kenon was part of that.
Silas was great and a big part of the teams success during the merger but that only lasted a short time because of the injury.
Bowen should not even be on the list yet. You put a one dimensional player before all star level players like Kenon and Silas ? Too many here have never seen Silas or Kenon.
-
Re: Spot Number 9 - Top 50 Spurs
-
Re: Spot Number 9 - Top 50 Spurs
-
Re: Spot Number 9 - Top 50 Spurs
For those that don't remember.
The spurs had a great run of success before Duncan and Pop.
They may have never won a title but they were regarded as the most exciting team in the league and they always made the playoffs. Those early Spur teams were much more fun to watch than the current Spurs. The Hemisphere Arena was the loudest arena in the league. The Spurs were from the defunct ABA which was considered inferior by some in the media and NBA. The Spurs entered the NBA with something to prove, that they belonged.
The ABA was the wild high scoring league as compared to the NBA and the Spurs brought that type of play into the NBA.
The Hemisphere Arena was one of the toughest places to play because it was small and the crowd noise level would get so high. I often can remember listening to games on a radio and hearing the place going wild, so much that it was had to hear the play by play call at times.
The spurs up tempo high scoring teams would also get the fans going wild.
Those successful early years is what kept the franchise alive.
-
Re: Spot Number 9 - Top 50 Spurs
Quote:
Originally Posted by
rascal
For those that don't remember.
The spurs had a great run of success before Duncan and Pop.
They may have never won a title but they were regarded as the most exciting team in the league and they always made the playoffs. Those early Spur teams were much more fun to watch than the current Spurs. The Hemisphere Arena was the loudest arena in the league. The Spurs were from the defunct ABA which was considered inferior by some in the media and NBA. The Spurs entered the NBA with something to prove, that they belonged.
The ABA was the wild high scoring league as compared to the NBA and the Spurs brought that type of play into the NBA.
The Hemisphere Arena was one of the toughest places to play because it was small and the crowd noise level would get so high. I often can remember listening to games on a radio and hearing the place going wild, so much that it was had to hear the play by play call at times.
The spurs up tempo high scoring teams would also get the fans going wild.
Those successful early years is what kept the franchise alive.
I never though I would say this....
I agree with rascal! :lol
Seriously though, great take.
-
Re: Spot Number 9 - Top 50 Spurs
Quote:
Originally Posted by
rascal
Larry Kenon should be even ahead of Elliott. He had the better overall stats. 20 point scorer and good rebounder 10+ per game with the spurs and shares the nba record for steals in a game. A solid player on both sides of the court unlike Bowen.
Kenon was also an important player on the team that entered the NBA. Had the spurs not had a great team during the merger they would not have made it into the NBA. Kenon was part of that.
Silas was great and a big part of the teams success during the merger but that only lasted a short time because of the injury.
Bowen should not even be on the list yet. You put a one dimensional player before all star level players like Kenon and Silas ? Too many here have never seen Silas or Kenon.
One thing that really hurts Kenon is the fact that the Spurs haven't retired his number. To expect Spurs fans to recognize him over players the Spurs themselves obviously hold in higher regard is pretty difficult.
Kenon probably has the best numbers outside of the top three players on this list but he's definitely a forgotten man ... who is even more forgotten because the Spurs didn't retire his number.
-
Re: Spot Number 9 - Top 50 Spurs
Like stats are the most important thing
So we have stats (LK) vs nonststs (BB)
Champion vs nonchampion
-
Re: Spot Number 9 - Top 50 Spurs
Mario Elie should be ahead of Avery Johnson.
Mario set the tone for that '99 team winning a Championship.
-
Re: Spot Number 9 - Top 50 Spurs
Quote:
Originally Posted by
50 cent
Mario Elie should be ahead of Avery Johnson.
Mario set the tone for that '99 team winning a Championship.
I'm an AJ hater but this is madness, imo.
-
Re: Spot Number 9 - Top 50 Spurs
Quote:
Originally Posted by
50 cent
Mario Elie should be ahead of Avery Johnson.
Mario set the tone for that '99 team winning a Championship.
Mario played one season for the Spurs and then mailed in one, which I will never forgive him for. Then he defected to Dallas to coach and fucked up our 3-peat.
Fuck Mario Elie. I'm sure he'll be top 20, but his azz won't get my vote.
-
Re: Spot Number 9 - Top 50 Spurs
I am disgusted by the fact that bruce bowen has not been picked yet
-
Re: Spot Number 9 - Top 50 Spurs
Since this one is close, I ran the IP check to make sure people are only voting once ... and Silas lost like five votes and Bowen lost a vote. Whoever is voting multiple times, please cease.
Thanks.
-
Re: Spot Number 9 - Top 50 Spurs
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Cant_Be_Faded
I am disgusted by the fact that bruce bowen has not been picked yet
Underrated a usual.
-
Re: Spot Number 9 - Top 50 Spurs
Quote:
Originally Posted by
timvp
One thing that really hurts Kenon is the fact that the Spurs haven't retired his number. To expect Spurs fans to recognize him over players the Spurs themselves obviously hold in higher regard is pretty difficult.
Kenon probably has the best numbers outside of the top three players on this list but he's definitely a forgotten man ... who is even more forgotten because the Spurs didn't retire his number.
All of which is a shame. Kenon WAS an all-star caliber PF for this franchise during the 4 years he played here. I'm not sure why he's such a forgotten man. And it looks as though the Spurs are not the only entity that has forgotten about Kenon.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Kenon
Though Memphis State, now the University of Memphis, has retired the numbers of other former basketball players, like Larry Finch, Keith Lee, and Anfernee Hardaway, Larry Kenon has never had his number retired. He arguably had the most successful pro career of any Memphis State basketball player.
-
Re: Spot Number 9 - Top 50 Spurs
Kenon had great stats, but he was actually a bit overrated. The guy wasn't particularly clutch, was arguably a worse defender than Gervin, and would pout when he felt he wasn't getting recognition--sort of an earlier personality of Shawn Marion. Added to the fact that he did very little to help the franchise off the court (although he still lives in SA), and I have no problems with him being a notch or two lower than his numbers would seem to indicate.
The one thing will say, he was the first 6'9" forward I ever saw who had carte blanche to bring the ball up the court. And in his era, he may have been in the top 5 fastest guys in the league at pushing the ball.
-
Re: Spot Number 9 - Top 50 Spurs
I'm leaning towards ordering the next few --> Silas, Bowen, AJ, Kenon.
-
Re: Spot Number 9 - Top 50 Spurs
That sounds right to me. Then the next tier will be Mike Mitchell, Artis Gilmore, Doug Moe, and Terry Cummings.
-
Re: Spot Number 9 - Top 50 Spurs
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ShoogarBear
That sounds right to me. Then the next tier will be Mike Mitchell, Artis Gilmore, Doug Moe, and Terry Cummings.
The wild cards will likely be RC Buford and the owners on the list. It'll be hard to place those four.
-
Re: Spot Number 9 - Top 50 Spurs
Yeah, you're right. RC, Red, and Holt, too. +/- McDermott, but I think he's clearly below the others.
-
Re: Spot Number 9 - Top 50 Spurs
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ShoogarBear
Kenon had great stats, but he was actually a bit overrated. The guy wasn't particularly clutch, was arguably a worse defender than Gervin, and would pout when he felt he wasn't getting recognition--sort of an earlier personality of Shawn Marion. Added to the fact that he did very little to help the franchise off the court (although he still lives in SA), and I have no problems with him being a notch or two lower than his numbers would seem to indicate.
The one thing will say, he was the first 6'9" forward I ever saw who had carte blanche to bring the ball up the court. And in his era, he may have been in the top 5 fastest guys in the league at pushing the ball.
How would you compare him to Mikan...or Naismith?