Printable View
:lolQuote:
Originally Posted by lefty
I wonder if Boston Celtic forums are as obsessed with trading Scalabrine as this one is with trading Bonner? I don't think any team would even trade a 2nd round pick for Bonner. At this point, the rights to #57 James Gist are more valuable trade fodder than Bonner.
Let's face it...we've dug ourselves a big hole by going "all in" with #21, #20, #12 and #9 (our "core group of players") BET THE HOUSE ON THAT HOLE and have since only filled it with shit to save a buck. I'm no longer optomistic.
Yeah, I have no idea what they were thinking especially after winning those titles... :rolleyesQuote:
Originally Posted by MrChug
...and you've forgotten about the 3 titles along the way, and the 2010 plan. Hey, I hate the 2010 plan, I'd like to see us going all-out now, but there is a scheme to it all.Quote:
Originally Posted by MrChug
I'll ignore the ignoramus above but I've paid appropriate attention to your logic in the past. MARK THIS: When we actually make the supreme "get us back on track" move in 2010 (which had better be stupendous) OR we are back to contention "form", then not only will I EAT the crow and BBQ it, I'll HAVE the BBQ and cook for all. If not...it's on you.Quote:
Originally Posted by RuffnReadyOzStyle
Just remember, there was a "Master Plan 2008" too.