...it's more likely that they consider most people stupid, I mean, look at Sarah Palin, and anyone that did notice is obviously a conspiracy nut....right?
Printable View
...it's more likely that they consider most people stupid, I mean, look at Sarah Palin, and anyone that did notice is obviously a conspiracy nut....right?
Sorry, there were many other live broadcasts that day, so we are actually talking about many more. If they did those five, they had to do them all.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nbadan
From their vantage point it very easily could have been a missile and not a plane...unless your arguing that we don't have missiles that look like planes...in which case, maybe we need to redefine who the liar really is....Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
Really? show me....Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
So you are calling them liars.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nbadan
Just so we all get this straight, NBAdan declares the firemen who witnessed a plane fly into the north tower liars.
I did. Your boys fucked up when they tried present those side by side comparisons as the same viewing angle. One is taken from above the roofline, the other is from below the roofline, hence the difference in the percieved position of the "ball" (which had the glint of wings) flying above the ground and the later footage in which the plane's silouette was easier to see since it was contrasted against blue sky.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nbadan
:rolleyes
Show you how many television companies had crews shoooting live video on 9/11?Quote:
Originally Posted by Nbadan
Are you kidding me?
You made the claim........almost ever national and international feed I've seen originated with one of the 5 major networks...Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
So how does a "ball" or a missle make this kind of hole?
http://members.shaw.ca/freedomsix/pics/wtc-hole1.jpg
Did they attach big ass wings to the missle? Wouldn't it be simpler for the conspirators to just crash an actual plane?
And how do you explain the plane debris found on the ground immediately after the impact?
I believe Gedeon Naudet caught this footage.
Really, wouldn't it just have been easier for the NWO to fly actual planes into the buildings?
I was there. I saw planes.
Of course, I was high on MJ and alcohol from an all night bender grabbing a bagel with a couple of latin girls with tight asses...
This is probably Dan's stupidest take ever. Not even mouse supports him.
How many times do I have to tell you......they used a ray gun.
Or was it the Crap Cannon? Yeah I think it was the Crap Cannon and
Dan got in the way of it.
Now that explains why he is so full of crap.
It's all just varying degrees of stupidity with Dan...mouse too, for that matter.Quote:
Originally Posted by smeagol
I knew I would catch hell from the same ole closed-minded crowd and they didn't fail me - but I hope that I got some people to think about a scenario that could have been possible (notice how I said 'possible' and not 'did') , this is precisely why I believe that we need to get rid of any connections to the current administration and their Neocon over-lords and then conduct a fact-based, through investigation into the events of Sept 11, 2001 - we owe it to the people who died on 9/11, the families that lost loved ones, and the heroes who risked everything to look for survivors and clean up the toxic debris that was declared safe by the current criminals in charge.
See dan, the problem is -- this video is completely full of shit and by swallowing its full load so eagerly, you are too.
You are now a no-planer, which is just shy of directed energy weapon proponent on the insane-o-meter.
My mind is closed to your no-plane theories because of the overwhelming evidence of planes at all the 9/11 sites. Badly edited stills of tenth-generation copies of broadcast tape made by idiots are not going to change my mind.
dump
No-planer owned by video expert.
So the video is full of shit just because you say so? The elitest Chumpdumper says so, so it must be true, right?Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
:rolleyes
I've given you many opportunities to show that this scenario is impossible and you've disproven none of them....your no better than Sarah Palin at this point....how far the mighty Chumpdumper has fallen...your now just a troll....
"Your nickname was never 'Ace'! Maybe 'Ace Hole'."Quote:
Originally Posted by DarrinS
Baker. Ace Baker.
You saw a shitty YouTube so it must be true, right?Quote:
Originally Posted by Nbadan
:rolleyes
It would be pretty easy to see a 767 from Chelsea. It's only three miles from the WTC site.Quote:
I've given you many opportunities to show that this scenario is impossible and you've disproven none of them....your no better than Sarah Palin at this point....how far the mighty Chumpdumper has fallen...your now just a troll....
Well.
There you go -- debunked.
That was easy, no-planer.
Now, please explain all the aircraft debris present immediately after the impacts and and why you think the FDNY heroes are liars.
:rolleyesQuote:
Originally Posted by DarrinS
about the only conclusion the 'video expert' reached was that this was a lousy piece of video for a news organization (which is exactly, by the way, what the video I post says), plus, he completely showed that he came into the discussion with a closed-mind about the government refusing to release a digital shot that could have dis-proven the missing plane theory..
Verdict: WEAK