HIS POST WAS HIS OPINION ON WHAT BUSH WILL REALLY BE JUDGED ON WHEN LOOKED BACK AT 50 YEARS FROM NOW!!!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Shastafarian
Printable View
HIS POST WAS HIS OPINION ON WHAT BUSH WILL REALLY BE JUDGED ON WHEN LOOKED BACK AT 50 YEARS FROM NOW!!!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Shastafarian
:lol timvp KEEPS dodging the history of President Bush. Fine, let's start again from scratch. Let's say you didn't claim you were only stating your opinion and wanted to ignore facts. What do you think of all the things Bush has done?
Thank you for yelling. It is quite irrelevant.Quote:
Originally Posted by johnsmith
Quote:
Originally Posted by fake timvp
So not only does this guy argue about a debate he didn't even watch, he argues about a post he didn't even read.Quote:
Originally Posted by the first line of the real timvp post
What's the count up to now?Quote:
Originally Posted by timvp
:lmao:lmao:lmaoQuote:
Originally Posted by timvp
Just for clarification:
I did watch the debate. I went to the bathroom somewhere around 25 minutes in so I didn't catch every question.
I did read his post. It's called "exaggeration".
Gonna keep dodging the history hypocrite?
The bathroom excuse :lmaoQuote:
Originally Posted by Shastafarian
Seriously bro, I don't know if maybe you are having a bad day or something but this has been the dumbest conversation I've ever engaged in during SpursTalk's history. Why would I have to dodge something that I acknowledge with my first sentence in the thread? I've already said Bush has done more bad than good. You posting a list of the bad strengthens my very first thought. If I argued against your list, I'd be arguing against myself.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shastafarian
You need to stop responding, print the thread and then read it. Perhaps then you can see how little sense you are making.
I'll give you a mulligan this time. Better luck next time :tu
Bush isn't to blame. He's just a puppet.
Check this video out with Aaron Russo http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nD7dbkkBIA
also hold on to your tinfoil hats cause...
Rockefeller Admitted Elite Goal Of Microchipped PopulationVIDEO: Rumsfeld Says Flight 93 Shot Down
Hollywood director Russo goes in-depth for first time on the astounding admissions of Nick Rockefeller, including his prediction of 9/11 and the war on terror hoax, the Rockefeller's creation of women's lib, and the elite's ultimate plan for world population reduction and a microchipped society
OTHER NEWS
__________Hollywood director and documentary film maker Aaron Russo has gone in-depth on the astounding admissions of Nick Rockefeller, who personally told him that the elite's ultimate goal was to create a microchipped population and that the war on terror was a hoax, Rockefeller having predicted an "event" that would trigger the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan eleven months before 9/11.Rockefeller also told Russo that his family's foundation had created and bankrolled the women's liberation movement in order to destroy the family and that population reduction was a fundamental aim of the global elite.Russo is perhaps best known for producing Trading Places starring Eddie Murphy but was more recently in the spotlight for his exposé of the criminal run for profit federal reserve system, the documentary America From Freedom to Fascism.Currently undergoing more treatment in his fight against cancer, Russo made time for a sit down interview with radio host and fellow documentary film maker Alex Jones in which he dropped bombshell after bombshell on what Rockefeller had told him about the direction the world was being steered towards by the global elite.You can watch a fourteen minute segment of the interview below.
After his popular video Mad As Hell was released and he began his campaign to become Governor of Nevada, Russo was noticed by Rockefeller and introduced to him by a female attorney. Seeing Russo's passion and ability to affect change, Rockefeller set about on a subtle mission to recruit Russo into the elite.During one conversation, Rockefeller asked Russo if he was interested in joining the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) but Russo rejected the invitation, saying he had no interest in "enslaving the people" to which Rockefeller coldly questioned why he cared about the "serfs.""I used to say to him what's the point of all this," states Russo, "you have all the money in the world you need, you have all the power you need, what's the point, what's the end goal?" to which Rockefeller replied (paraphrasing), "The end goal is to get everybody chipped, to control the whole society, to have the bankers and the elite people control the world."Rockefeller even assured Russo that if he joined the elite his chip would be specially marked so as to avoid undue inspection by the authorities
This guy's made my heard hurt since he got here.
Spursreport, right? It makes sense if you think about it.
Go find my posts at SpursReport. Please.Quote:
Originally Posted by MannyIsGod
K, you're not from Spursreport. You win, I guess.
Maybe it's because you rolled your eyes at the premise of the thread and called it "hyperbole". Me "copying and pasting" a history of Bush was a response to your claim of hyperbole. I think questioning whether he is the worst president is legitimate (even if I don't agree with it). You're dodging the notion all together instead of responding to that VERY long list of shit Bush has done. Maybe I was looking for a response to it rather than, "they're just talking points". Ever think of that?Quote:
Originally Posted by timvp
Never said that.Quote:
Originally Posted by MannyIsGod
I don't enjoy being called a hypocrite so I found it funny when timvp dismissed a very long list of illegal/immoral activities as "talking points".
And I was in the bathroom. I had already downed 3 beers doing a debate drinking game. McCain just couldn't stop saying "my friends".Quote:
Originally Posted by timvp
"The Shastafaritard"
:lol:lol:lol
I'm actually with timvp on this one.
That's fine. That's your opinion. It's my opinion timvp doesn't think Bush is one of the worst 5 presidents in our history and refuses to refute or agree with any of the facts presented in the history I posted.Quote:
Originally Posted by peewee's lovechild
You should have stopped.
Do you know what hyperbole means?Quote:
Originally Posted by Shastafarian
No, I can confidently say you don't know what hyperbole means. And you can quit putting quotes around that phrase since you did copy and paste.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shastafarian
How can I dodge something that was my first sentence? I said he did a bad. You post bad. You agreed with me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shastafarian
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shastafarian
Maybe that's where you went wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shastafarian
You must have missed the intended irony of my post. Read it again and then figure it out.Quote:
Originally Posted by timvpAnswer my post directly. Don't go to rehearsed talking points.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shastafarian
You might have to print out and read the whole political forum if you don't understand :lol
He said Bottom 25%, which would be down to about 8 presidents or so. So you're making yourself look like an idiot over about 3 presidents which I'm not sure you could name without going to some blog or wikipedia.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shastafarian
You did this with Whottt and those California comments. I don't know man, you just make my head hurt sometimes.
:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmao:lmaoQuote:
Originally Posted by Shastafarian
That f'n gold. You have an opinion on what my opinion is? What makes it even funnier is I already said bottom 25%. Math much?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shastafarian
I already agreed before you even posted it.
this thread is funny...some serious pwnage going on in here!
*sigh*
Yes I know what hyperbole means. Maybe you can't read good. You claimed the thread was hyperbole. Correct? I posted a history of events that showed that the thread was not hyperbole (with my understanding of the facts...which you have yet to comment directly on). Bush might be considered to be the worst president in history. Is it my view? Not necessarily but it is a valid question GIVEN THE FACTS I POSTED. I continue to quote "copy and pasted" because you used it as a diversion from you not actually responding directly to anything in the history. Why is that so hard to understand? Maybe you should go back and print out the thread to see if you get the irony...
I have my secret timvp decoder ring out -- I'm pretty sure that bottom 25% in SpursTalk actually means "the best one ever."
Jesus christ....maybe you need to go look up ironyQuote:
Originally Posted by timvp