I get a good feeling when board Republicans panic over things like this.
Printable View
I get a good feeling when board Republicans panic over things like this.
It's amazing how many people in government used to work for Fannie/Freddie :lmao
"Change"
wouldn't it be a negative for the 13th Amendment?Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
And where is Dan, a couple of years ago him and boutons were crying on this board that Bush and Cheney were going to institute a draft for all young folks.
Now Obama and Emanuel are talking about compulsory service and they're worshiping the development.
From what I've read, it's far from compulsory.
And isn't it funny that the sponsor was a democrat, I think it was Shcumer, and all the co-sponsors were democrat. Not a single republican backed the draft bill!Quote:
Originally Posted by Aggie Hoopsfan
I already saw a retort that "It wouldn't be mandatory." Then why is this in the earlier quote:
And they correctly say the republicans will see it as an infringement of freedom. If not a draft, what is it when they acknowledge freedoms are an issue?Quote:
Emanuel and co-author Bruce Reed insist "this is not a draft," but go on to write of young men and women, "the nation will enlist them for three months of civilian service." They also warn, "[s]ome Republicans will squeal about individual freedom," ruling out any likelihood that they would let people opt out of universal citizen service.