So, you're agreeing that Pop completely fucked up, T Park?
Printable View
So, you're agreeing that Pop completely fucked up, T Park?
What were you right about? Pop fucked up. He even admitted he fucked up. Salute that bitch.
Who only draws up one option for an end of game play. If the defense covers it, then what? Oh yeah, Parker dribbles out the clock and we lose.
Kori - here's the problem with Parker - all night long he was missing wide open players to take it on himself to score. You touched on it - Devin was wide open in the corner.
As for the last play, if Parker wanted a pick set, why can't he call on someone to come set it for him? Instead he dribbled out the clock and threw up a half-hearted attempt to win at the end. You're the point guard, the starting point guard no less - speak up.
Well that's just fine and dandy, now if only we can get David Stern to start awarding the trophy for regular season victories, we'd be set.Quote:
And they've probably got the best record of any NBA team in that same five-year stretch. So, they've probably held on to a few leads too, me thinks.
I'm pretty sure that he was told to look to score instead of looking to pass last night. I'm not giving that as an excuse for the final play, of course. That was just a fuck-up all the way around. But I think that's normally the plan when Manu/Tim are out -- for Tony to look to shoot first.Quote:
Kori - here's the problem with Parker - all night long he was missing wide open players to take it on himself to score.
Tony had an awesome first half -- so I don't think anyone would complain about him not passing as much in the first half. The reason that things changed so dramatically in the second half is because of George Karl's adjustment (putting Buckner on him).
"George Karl's adjustment"
.. and the Spurs failed to score 20 points in either quarter in the second half, after scoring 25 in qtrs 1 and 2 each.
Correct. Because the Spurs did nothing to counter Karl's adjustment. Just like they did nothing to counter Phil's adjustment last postseason.Quote:
.. and the Spurs failed to score 20 points in either quarter in the second half, after scoring 25 in qtrs 1 and 2 each.
That's pathetic too. Go back to the Nets - they took Parker out of his game by throwing a longer Kerry Kittles on him.
Two years later, Pop still can't adjust to that, pretty damn disturbing. And you can bet teams will recognize it and utilize that defensive tactic more and more on him, especially come playoff time.
We play Seattle, and you'll have Antonio shutting down Tony. Phoenix and it'll be Joe Johnson. And others have already touched on it - in that situation you flatten out the offense and iso Tony out top. But instead, Pop thinks pick and roll is the way to go, but unfortunately it brings another defender into the picture that can hedge on Tony and slow him down.
Sad, really.
And Kori - Tony missed Barry WIDE open on one offensive possession where he got stuffed going one on five, and Pop was yelling at him to see the whole court because he had a man wide open. So while I think he definitely had the green light to score, I don't think it excuses him from taking the whole court into consideration.
That's well known that Tony struggles against SG with long arms defending on him, but that frees Ginobili because he will be against a PG. Remember that it will be the first time Ginobili will start in the playoff along with Parker, I don't think coaches will get confortable throwing their best defender on Parker and letting Manu against their PG.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aggie Hoopsfan
You are right about Parker not looking for his partners as much as he should have, but apart of this he was great for the last two games with AI type of stats and with less TO. The really big problem was his 4th quarter performances.
Coaches don't have to throw their best defender on Tony, just a taller guard with some quickness. Kittles wasn't exactly all-NBA defense, but his long arms and height did the job.
I rewatched the second half to see what hindered Parker. It wasn't Buckner per se. Parker has learned to deal with long, strong guards like Kittles since his first go around when Finley and Kittles gave him so much trouble in the playoffs.
The problem in this game was in part Parker wasn't as aggressive in the second half but mostly the Spurs were setting absolutely horrid picks. They were setting up way to early, rolling way too early, Not setting up for a repick, when Parker was getting jumped instead of the pick (Horry) rolling to the basket giving Parker an easy pass the pick faded to the sideline leaving Parker high and dry. That was one putrid game that Horry played last night.
In re-watching, did you see exactly when Parker got injured? He supposedly took a knee to the thigh and could barely walk at practice. But I don't remember seeing it happen in the game.
Didn't see it. Didn't see him limping at any point. At first I thought it was the play where Miller and Martin banged knees but it looked like he came through that contact clean.
OK, they don't have the most championships, but they have the second most championships. You demand a title a year, or what? The Spurs are the NBA's model of consistancy.Quote:
Originally Posted by ShoogarBear
The Spurs didn't lose because of an inability nto execute down the stretch. They lost because the Lakers had Shaq and Kobe who were both at the peaks of their games. The Spurs couldn't match that firepower every season. And we shouldn't have expected them to.
Maybe you didn't see the 2002 WC semifinals, when the Spurs led the Lakers in every 4th quarter but only won 1 of 5.Quote:
Originally Posted by Carnac
And anything less than making it to the Finals this year, when they have been the favorities almost since Day One, would be considered a disappointment.