Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastr

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

12-30-2010
ChumpDumper

Re: Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Cat

Yeah mouse, start off by telling us how much potential energy is contained in 20 or 30 acre-sized floors of office building several hundred feet in the air.

We'll wait.
12-31-2010
mouse

Re: Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Cat

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

That's from an earthquake.

Sorry if Google isn't overly saturated with images of buildings that have collapsed due to small fires or planes crashing into them.

Quote:

How would silent, incendiary nanothermite do that, mouse?

Be specific.

Why not ask the professors and scientist who deal with those types of explosives and chemicals?

I don't have to have a PHD in order to post my views on a subject or in this topic.

I have eyes and I can see when something falls down due to gravity and when something is cut down due to outside involvement.

The truth is your re-fried tactics of putting me on the witness stand is not fresh and is a very outdated technique not seen since the JFK investigations.

Face it Chump your going to have to deal with the reality that this whole WTC7 investigation is about to expose you and wildcobra as some of the most ignorant people living on this planet.
12-31-2010
mouse

Re: Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Cat

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wild Cobra

Can you show me the math to prove your statement?

I didn't think so.

so your saying 2 + 2 = 4 won't do?
12-31-2010
mouse

Re: Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Cat

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

Yeah mouse, start off by telling us how much potential energy is contained in 20 or 30 acre-sized floors of office building several hundred feet in the air.

I know it was enough explosive force to send small bone fragments to a rooftop of a building not even in the area of the search for remains.

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/bodies.html

Quote:

We'll wait.

Good thing your hero didn't have to wait long for his Insurance check.

http://img690.imageshack.us/img690/5656/43459823.jpg
12-31-2010
mouse

Re: Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Cat

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wild Cobra

show me the math

nearly 2,800 victims
fewer than 300 whole bodies found
fewer than 1,600 victims identified
over 1,100 victims remain unidentified
over 800 victims identified by DNA alone
nearly 20,000 pieces of bodies found
over 6,000 pieces small enough to fit in test-tubes
over 200 pieces matched to single person
nearly 10,000 unidentified pieces frozen for future analysis

Is that enough math for you?

Here's more....

Most of the bone fragments were less then 1/16th inch in length. how can a collapsing building all of a sudden turn into a food processor?

hers is some math you can use.

How far does my huge foot of truth have to bury itself in your crusty commie Bush loving ass to equal 3 more pages of you getting schooled?
12-31-2010
DMX7

Re: Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Cat

Quote:

Originally Posted by mouse

The truth is your re-fried tactics of putting me on the witness stand is not fresh and is a very outdated technique not seen since the JFK investigations.

:lol
12-31-2010
Nbadan

Re: Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Cat

Quote:

Originally Posted by Winehole23

Beg pardon. What, please?

I'm just saying that even if there was a bigger conspiracy to bring down the twin towers by some MIC secret society as some allege....trying to prove that thermite was used will get you nowhere,,,unless you want a headache...
12-31-2010
ChumpDumper

Re: Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Cat

Quote:

Originally Posted by mouse

Sorry if Google isn't overly saturated with images of buildings that have collapsed due to small fires or planes crashing into them.

Actually, there are probably more pictures of those than buildings toppled by earthquakes.

I wouldn't expect you to understand what I just said, but thanks for proving the WTC buildings were not felled by an earthquake. You do know that one of the authors of this paper being discussed believes the US government caused he big earthquake in Haiti, don't you? This is your hero.

Quote:

Why not ask the professors and scientist who deal with those types of explosives and chemicals?

Funny you should mention that, as we have yet to hear from any in this thread. That paper certainly wasn't written by people who deal with these materials -- otherwise they would have known to run the definitive test for thermite, which is x-ray diffraction that would have only cost a couple hundred dollars to have it done by an independent lab.

Maybe they just ran out of money making YouTubes.

Or maybe they don't know what they are doing.

Or maybe they were just lying.

Quote:

I don't have to have a PHD in order to post my views on a subject or in this topic.

You lack even the most basic knowledge of 9/11, yet you post about it all the time.

Quote:

I have eyes and I can see when something falls down due to gravity and when something is cut down due to outside involvement.

Tell us how it was cut down, mouse.

Tell us what you think really happened on 9/11.

Quote:

The truth is your re-fried tactics of putting me on the witness stand is not fresh and is a very outdated technique not seen since the JFK investigations.

Hey, it still works. It never fails to make you whine about how little you actually know about any of this.

Quote:

Face it Chump your going to have to deal with the reality that this whole WTC7 investigation is about to expose you and wildcobra as some of the most ignorant people living on this planet.

Tell us how that is going to happen.

If you actually read this paper, you'll find out that they actually disproved the presence of thermite with their own data, and supported the argument that the substance is paint.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mouse

I know it was enough explosive force to send small bone fragments to a rooftop of a building not even in the area of the search for remains.

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/bodies.html

Right.

Now all you have to do is figure out of the potential energy of 20-30 acre-sized floors of office building could have that kind of effect.

It's not like these calculations haven't been done, mouse. Certainly as a concerned, truth-seeking patriot you are familiar with them.

Aren't you?

Quote:

Good thing your hero didn't have to wait long for his Insurance check.

http://img690.imageshack.us/img690/5656/43459823.jpg

Are you saying Silverstein is the mastermind behind 9/11?

Please explain your theory in full -- you don't have to be a PhD to regale us with your story of a simple insurance scam.
12-31-2010
ChumpDumper

Re: Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Cat

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nbadan

I'm just saying that even if there was a bigger conspiracy to bring down the twin towers by some MIC secret society as some allege....trying to prove that thermite was used will get you nowhere,,,unless you want a headache...

So tell us what you think really happened on 9/11, dan.

Give us something to believe.
12-31-2010
mouse

Re: Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Cat

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

So tell us what you think really happened on 9/11, dan.

Give us something to believe.

I told you Chump would pull out the JFK card. For some reason he thinks he's the DA and we are on the witness stand.

He acts like he's Kevin Costner and we are the corrupt CIA agents, when in fact all these meaningless questions is a smoke screen a diversion to get us off track.

When i get back later (provided there isn't an army of drunken fools without someone to be with and don't have anywhere to spend New years)
around my laptop, Then I will make an attempt to address each meaningless questions Mr. Costner has posted.

The sad part is after all these years it's obvious Chump really doesn't want the truth, if he did he would welcome this new evidence instead he's in full blown Bill O'Reilly mode.

Wake Up and Smell the Aluminothermic Nanocomposite Explosives
As Documentation of Thermitic Materials
in the WTC Twin Towers Grows,
Official Story Backers Ignore, Deny, Evade, and Dissemble

http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/t..._timeline.html
12-31-2010
Nbadan

Re: Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Cat

I agree with mouse on one point, there is eyewitness testimony and enough sound evidence on tape to show that there were explosions inside some of the WTC buildings prior to their collapse....CD can go to hell...
12-31-2010
mouse

Re: Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Cat

Like I said before he denies the Hindenburg caught fire because the film was in black and white.

He doesn't think JFK was shot because it wasn't in HD.

He doesn't support the battle of the Alamo because he can't find any fight scenes on youtube. and even if there was a youtube link he would say "what do you think really happened at the Alamo?"

http://rockcreekfreepress.tumblr.com...de-center-dust

http://rockcreekfreepress.com/Images...rayChip-sm.jpg
http://rockcreekfreepress.com/Images...pMagnified.jpg
12-31-2010
Blake

Re: Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Cat

Quote:

Originally Posted by mouse

It was no big secret the building was going to be attacked Larry Silverstein wanted to make sure he could cash in on it. Why fix a building you wanted to get rid of already.

how much extra money has Silverstein come out on top in all of this?

I know you rely on others in here to do math higher than 2+2=4, but try to include rebuilding costs after insurance payouts to back up your claims of him cashing in.
12-31-2010
ChumpDumper

Re: Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Cat

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nbadan

I agree with mouse on one point, there is eyewitness testimony and enough sound evidence on tape to show that there were explosions inside some of the WTC buildings prior to their collapse....

I never disputed that there were explosions inside some of the WTC buildings prior to their collapse. Things explode quite often in fires.

Quote:

CD can go to hell...

Yes, the controlled demolition theory can go to hell -- well, it could if there was a theory to begin with.

There isn't one.

You and mouse just proved it.

Again.

U mad?
12-31-2010
Blake

Re: Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Cat

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

Why haven't they conclusively found the actual chemical makeup of the material and duplicated the experiment several times using independent labs?

That's not real hard, is it?

Address a bunch of made-up crap by a bunch of loons?

If there is nothing at all to say, would you expect anything other than silence?

The stigma is there for a reason. These douchebags are now collectively the boy who cried nanothermite, where before they were collectively the boy who cried wing pods and drone planes and cruise missiles and planted explosives and directed energy weapons, etc.

Forgive our skepticism, but these people have been full of shit for the better part of a decade. They have been retreating from each stupid position they have taken once it is smashed upon the rocks of simple common sense and cursory logical reasoning. It's not a stretch to conclude that this latest (for you) conspiracy theory is constructed wholly from the confirmation bias of the "scientists" who have been convinced from the beginning that the US government was complicit in or caused the 9/11 attacks.

They have outright lied in pursuit of their cause in the past, and they are not above lying again.

What the fuck does that even mean?

Were you being serious?

So you just aren't going to answer the question?

OK.

The single issue here is you think something happened different than the accepted theory.

Just tell us what it is.

Give us something to believe -- you obviously believe something else happened. Make your theory fit what was observed.

Then why the fuck are you trying to convince anyone of anything?

Get back to me when one of you loons has an actual working theory that fits the observed events of 9/11. Otherwise, you are wasting everyone's time.

If you are going to whine that that's too difficult for you, tough shit. I don't care. I know way more about 9/11 than any normal person should know because a bunch of idiots said "Well what about [insert single issue here]?" They all turned out to be a bunch of fucking weaklings who, once their pet issue was debunked, just posted another YouTube and declared that to be the new smoking gun. I'm fucking sick of it.

I asked you the simple question of how the conspirators could get the nanothermite in the exact locations of the plane impacts. You conveniently ignored it, which is understandable -- but that's the kind of blind spot I expect from conspiracy theorists who have no theory like you. This doesn't even pass the smell test, but our own confirmation bias forces you to believe it.

You are a fool.

http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploa..._badger350.jpg
01-01-2011
mouse

Re: Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Cat

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

So tell us what you think really happened on 9/11, dan.

Give us something to believe.

You didn't get a copy ?

http://www.madcowprod.com/story.911.commission.jpg
01-01-2011
ChumpDumper

Re: Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Cat

Quote:

Originally Posted by mouse

You didn't get a copy ?

http://www.madcowprod.com/story.911.commission.jpg

More stalling with failed jokes. This is why the "truth" movement is ridiculed. Even they don't believe their own bullshit.
01-01-2011
Nbadan

Re: Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Cat

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

More stalling with failed jokes. This is why the "truth" movement is ridiculed. Even they don't believe their own bullshit.

The 911 Commission Report is also one reason why wild conspiracy theories continue to perpetuate about 911 like thermite......it's got so many holes, and in some cases, outright lies, it's laughable...
01-01-2011
ChumpDumper

Re: Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Cat

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nbadan

The 911 Commission Report is also one reason why wild conspiracy theories continue to perpetuate about 911 like thermite......it's got so many holes, and in some cases, outright lies, it's laughable...

Great.

What is your theory?
01-01-2011
Nbadan

Re: Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Cat

Never said I had one, just that the existing theory does not pass the smell test. For you to act like it's unfathomable that the 911 Commission made structural mistakes in their report is laughable too...
01-01-2011
ChumpDumper

Re: Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Cat

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nbadan

Never said I had one, just that the existing theory does not pass the smell test. For you to act like it's unfathomable that the 911 Commission made structural mistakes in their report is laughable too...

Too bad the commission wasn't the only official investigation.

And if you don't have an alternative theory after nine years, you never will.

No one ever will.
01-01-2011
Nbadan

Re: Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Cat

it was the only investigation with subpoena power...which makes it the only official investigation....
01-01-2011
ChumpDumper

Re: Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Cat

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nbadan

it was the only investigation with subpoena power...which makes it the only official investigation....

The FBI investigation wasn't official?

:lmao

It's these kinds of bald-faced lies that make you a laughing stock, dan.
01-01-2011
Nbadan

Re: Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Cat

How do we know the FBI wasn't involved? ...it's these kinds of assumptions, without proof, that make your argument less credible
01-01-2011
ChumpDumper

Re: Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Cat

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nbadan

How do we know the FBI wasn't involved? ...it's these kinds of assumptions, without proof, that make your argument less credible

How do you know the FBI was involved, along with every other agency that made official investigations of 9/11? It's these kinds of assumptions, without proof, that make your argument less credible.

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page