Printable View
She wasn't talking to regular mainstream people.
LMFAO at this douche
"you really don't need to be so antagonistic" :lmao
1:30
"i didn't say it was about republicans"
1:24
boy did she look stupid. she wasn't all high and mighty when her camera wasn't on her. just goes to show you there are ankle-grabbers then non ankle-grabbers.
I was hoping to hear the call from Mount Pleasant, Texas.
Wolcott looks like he needs a cup of coffee and an occasional workout. He was quick to try cover the smoldering remains of the Tea parties with a wet blanket. And though he may have been correct to remark on the lack of organization and numbers relative to antiwar and immigration protests, the respective*movements* lionized by Wolcott seem not to have survived the transition to Obama.
white folks are angry these days
That bitch got told!
lol, that was great.
This whole tea bagging was anti OBAMA , you cannot deny this people!! you hate our President because he is black and smart and the republicans failed and now you guys are acting like a wounded animal fighting to stay alive and are complaining about everything this man does. I am surprised there were no white sheets out. BTW did anyone notice anyone of color in the crowds??? I didn't think so..
well, it doesn't make a lot of sense to protest Bush does it?
lol
you're probably right about a lot of people, but Bush started to sell us down the river and Obama is closing the deal.
I thought Obama was the president of America so wouldn't that make him every American's president or is he only the president to people that voted for him? Was Bush not the president to all of his haters and bashers?
it's the do-as-i-say-not-as-i-do era, man. get used to the double standards.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacob1983
Did he say you shouldn't be protesting Obama?
No.
Have you guys ever gotten a point?
The tea parties were anti-out of control spending.Quote:
Originally Posted by redskinfan
To bring race into it is just ignorant, but you sound like you don't have a clue any way.
There were people there that were proud democrats, liberals, etc.
Did you go to a tea party? I'm doubting it. The one here in Dallas had several minorities in it, and actually the only sign I saw with something derogatory on it was being held by a black guy.
Suggesting that Obama is mentally feeble and pussified, that he is venal and inept, that he is diabolical and conniving, that he is Mussolini and Hitler rolled into one and that he is hastening the demise of the American republic on one hand, while twitting Redskinfan for claiming Obama as his own President when really he is *everyone's President* on the other, is cheeky and strains credibility.
IMO you do not mean it, VLE.
Your side used to swing the hammer. Now it is the nail and you cry *oppression!*
AHF, roving ST reporter. That's all I have to say about that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aggie Hoopsfan
Sound off, Dallas!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winehole23
??? hmm. don't know why i received that. i'm not claiming oppression. it is what it is. it's what i see and we all have to live with it until it changes. bush was my president and now obama is my president. they were both our president's. i've said in a previous post that before every meal, when i go to sleep and wake up, i pray to God for my family, friends, my country and my president. i commented with the "do-as-i-say-and-not-as-i do" 'cause the people that scorned bush said "he's not my president" yet they get pissed with the people that say "obama's not my president". you can't tell me that's not going now. capiche?
Bush was my president.
My horrible, horrible president.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winehole23
Obama's politics seem, at least when he was running for Pres., as standard liberal Democratic more than anything else.
The GOP has yet not found a way to tap into the public's frustration with the bailouts. A primary reason is that so many in the leadership have been in favor of those and voted for them, while I would hazard to say that a majority of the party is not.
I think a fair line of attack on the current administration is that the country is in the midst of dealing with this financial crisis, and the administration has put forth a budget with significant amounts of new spending on new programs as if the government has unlimited resources at its disposal.
Capische.Quote:
Originally Posted by Viva Las Espuelas
I was summing up and rolled you unfairly into the judgment. I apologize for directing my post at you, VLE. I also see now your subtler point about hypocrisy, but it overlooks the obvious sarcasm inspiring liberal attacks on the patriotism of critics.
Sure, it's petty. It's way overplayed. It's tedious and phony and tiresome --
only a few months after the elections.
Payback is a bitch.
Our political leadership is out of touch and government spends like there's no tomorrow. Fiscal restraint is totally out to lunch, and the forecasts are all dependably rosy. It's damn scary. Self-delusion has been the default state of government for eight plus years, and the recent reversal of power does not seem to have dispelled the curse. Quite the reverse. More continuity.Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcus Bryant
A trillion is the new billion.Quote:
Originally Posted by Winehole23
:lol BushQuote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
Bush sucked ass, there's no doubt.
Bullshit! They were there...Quote:
Originally Posted by redskinfan
http://blog.nj.com/morristown_impact...e_IMG00031.jpg
Quote:
Originally Posted by redskinfan
Are your serious??? Protests against an progressive tax system is anti Obama? This nation used to be about how much you grossed per year and now it's about our net. Taxes take out almost 50% - some say more - of our anual earinigs. That takes into account federal, state and local taxes. The welfare state has grown from it's inception and entitlements aboundn. I'm not saying that we shouldn't try to take care of the less fortunate in society but there needs to be a balance and many think there isn't one anymore.
Because he is black!!! Our president???? Me thinks you are showing your colors, too! How about a left of center liberal that believes in socialism. That big brother needs to step in and take over how this nation needs to be run. This man took over $120K from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in a three year period in lobby $$$. Now that was a good haul for any politican. He was part of the problem just like many a Republican. We have a major problem on the federal level and it has to do with politicans feathering their beds at the expense of the populace. The creeping socialism that was discuused in the '70's and 80's aint creeping anymore. It's been to pick up momentum for some time and if we don't stop it or at least slow it down then in a few generations we will be another epithat in the history books.
White sheets!!! You've played the racist card from the beginning. Surprised you aren't related to Johnny Cochran. Have you ever thought that people demonstrate about polices and ideas rather strictly about race? Many of the voters for Obama are in the lower income brackets and need for the government to step in and transfer monies from the productive side of society to the nonproductive one. Be careful here. If you continue to take more and more from the productive side of society in order to keep the nonproductive side content then expect for future genrations to produce less. Why? Simply becasue it isn't in their best interest to work and produce only for the govertnment to take the majority of it in taxes. Eventually they will scale back their efforts to match the taxes they pay which means that society will have less to go around. ie...Soviet Union is a recent example and Rome is the classic example when researching the effects the public dole has on society.
As George Bernard Shaw stated very well "A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul".
As we continue to let government expand another quote comes to mind. This one by Thomas Jefferson. "A governemt big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have."
In the video wasn't there a brief segment about how our monies are being taken from the people and being spent unwisely? That it had nothing to do with Republican party and I think she was referring to the federal government?
"Democracy must be something more than two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner" James Bovard, Civil Libertarian (1994).
WE be the sheep. Lamb chops anyone?
1/4 Cup dijon mustard
1/4 Cup honey
1 clove garlic, minced
1/4 teaspoon ground ginger
4 each large lamb shoulder chops
Mix together first 5 ingredients.
Trim excess fat from chops; place chops on grill.
Generously spread chops with half of spice mixture and baste during grilling.
Cook each side for 3 - 4 minutes to seal then another 3 - 4 minutes for medium. For well done chops, continue cooking for another 2 - 3 minutes.
Served here with cannellini beans and stewed zucchini with tomatoes.
Which bracket do you fall in? if your taxes went up it's because you are in the top 1 percent of money makers. So you must be a multi millionaire then!Quote:
Originally Posted by NFGIII
BTW I never had lamb chops is this a real recipe?
I like lamb chops. Does that make me a wolf?
lol i tried to click on the video to fullscale it and it read "This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by Cable News Network, Inc."
The reporter was a bitch, so people were bitching about that.
i wonder why CNN would remove a video because of a copyright claim when most of the footage was the aftermath...
It makes them look bad.
lower middle to mddle class - I usually get money back but my tax status isn't the issue. And far from me being a multi millionaire though I wish it were so. The historical evidence is indisputable to me - this nation has a progressive tax structure and takes from the well to do to transfer it to the less fortunate. I believe that we as a people should take care of the less fortunate but not neccessarily to the extent that it is being done now. And frankly I really don't know what to do about this situation either. But to me I see a subservient class of people with little hope and dependent on the government for it's very survival. This isn't what I think our founding fathers had envisioned nor is it a helathy situation. Like Rome where the Ceasar's used to public dole and the games to quiet the lower classes and keep them under control I see the very same thing with entittlements. They are pertetuating themselves with a mental attitude that they are entittled to these benefits. And the situation continues to grow and one day it will have to be reconciled. I'm not happy with either party and unfortunately a third party movement isn't going to happen unless this nation has some sort of ephihany or revelation of some kind. But I only see apathetic people struggling to make ends meet. The chasm between the rich and the rest of us is widening. And I don't think socialism to the extent that the Democratic Party wants is the answer. A blend of socialism and capitalism but to what %s each will get is up for debate. I just know the system is broke and a massive overhaul isn't likely to work. Could this be a symptom of a maturing nation where at some point in time the acquisition of material goods superseeds all else, especially the ethics and morality on which this nation was built?
Many a time when I discuss politics I usually get a response along the lines of "What can I do? I'm just one person. I have so much to do I really don't have the time to protest/go to meetings/ do mailouts...etc." And I really can't blame them but as we go so goes the nation.
And yes that is a real recipe and I got it from Epicurious.com.
I like lamb too so I guess I also voted to have the sheep!
Madonna was right - we are living in a material world!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winehole23
ohhhhhhh it all makes sense now
:bking
Spiritual renewal? One of the primal American themes....Quote:
Originally Posted by NFGIII
It's rather late in the day to be worried about that, but your aim is true IMO.Quote:
Could this be a symptom of a maturing nation where at some point in time the acquisition of material goods superseeds all else, especially the ethics and morality on which this nation was built?
It's more to the point immediately that debt and liabilities have wildly outstripped the available wealth. The spectacle is Weimar decadence and the shadow it casts is national default. But the roots of the problem may be more or less as you describe.
Nothing stresses the prevailing immorality quite so well as stressing the importance of morality.
BTW, thanks for the recipe. I just bookmarked it.