Quote:
Originally Posted by
Yonivore
So, you didn't use the actual memorandums, go to the law library, study up on interrogations and write a brief that demonstrated how U.S. v Parker and U.S. v. Lee were relevant to prosecuting DOJ Lawyers for rendering an opinion on what constituted torture?
Nope. Bybee and Yoo never studied up on Parker or Lee either -- or did and purposely left them out of their legal arguments -- which makes them really bad lawyers. The only reason you have the full citations is that you asked me for them since you decided to stall and deny the case actually existed. Tell me -- what did you do with the full citations once you had them? Last I checked, you were still asking me to hold your hand and tell you what Lee was about.
Quote:
Wow! You just googled and linked to stories? So how, exactly is that different than my googling and ripping off content to which you merely link?
I never pretended to write the articles myself.
Quote:
Like I said, your ideas are no more original than mine. They're based on second-, third-, fourth- or more-handed information gathered from sources you trust and can find on the internet.
I don't pretend I wrote them myself.
Quote:
The only difference is that I don't take the time to reformulate others words into my own and post it. If I agree with what is being said, I cut and paste it here.
Yes, the difference is you are so insecure, you need to pretend you wrote them yourself.
Quote:
Frankly, I would think the content is more important than the method for the content being posted. Call me lazy, call me disingenuous, call me a plagiarist; I don't care. But, don't pretend your attacks on me, in any way, respond to the content I've posted.
You are lazy, disingenuous, a liar and a thief. I respond to the content you steal as well.
Quote:
I challenge your assertion. Not anywhere near "pretty much everyone in the legal community" has even stated an opinion on this matter publicly. Again, you -- like me -- are relying on internet sources you trust. I get that. But, that, in itself, doesn't translate to anything meaningful where a debate in an internet forum is concerned. You simply post information you believe supports your position and I do the same.
Any lawyer that has commented on the research has said it sucked.
Quote:
Considering a) there have been no criminal charges filed on anyone -- most particularly Yoo and Bybee -- and b) not even a significant fraction of the evidence necessary for you to draw the conclusions reached. The assertion Bybee and Yoo violated the law are premature and based on biases you have against everyone associated with the Bush administration.
They sucked as lawyers. That's not necessarily a crime. That doesn't mean they didn't suck. Your sucking is not a crime, yet you do suck.
Quote:
Otherwise, you'd be insisting Congresswoman Pelosi and Congressman Rockefeller be similarly prosecuted because they were complicit in the enhanced interrogation techniques being employed.
If it is indeed criminal, sure. I'm not a blind partisan like you.
Quote:
You are a useful idiot in the left's attempts to mask low politics as high principle.
You are a useless idiot who doesn't underrstand what he steals.
Quote:
Ah, the arrogance of idiocy. Explain, first, what crimes Bybee and Yoo committed. Then, tell me how U. S. v. Parker and U. S. vs. Lee are relevant.
Ah, the idiocy of Yoni. tell me where I claimed a crime was committed.
Quote:
Meh, you do the same but, you just run others ideas through that pea brain of yours.
I'm not a common thief.
Quote:
I've never lied and, I readily admit that I steal content and post it to appear as if it's my own. I've explained in great detail why. But, it's not an attempt to get credit for the content...not that I care if you belive otherwise.
It is absolutely an attempt to get credit for yourself. You havesome need to appear as if you wrote everything yourself, so you lie about it every time you steal someone else's work.
You're a liar, and of course my attacks get to you. Otherwise you wouldn't be whining about it so much trying to justify your stealing and lying.
