Someone hand me a sick bucket.
Printable View
Someone hand me a sick bucket.
Tharts totally ridiculous obama is God.....he's the messiah not God.Quote:
Originally Posted by DarrinS
Just watch all the liberals on this site start back peddeling and justifying this messianic horseshit.
Or maybe this nut job could join the other nut job sotomayor and "rephrase" what he just said
Sotomayor: "What I meant to say Congressman was Fuck Whitey but it was taken totally out of context."
7 1/2 more years!!
:lmao
Ths Messiah crap was started by hate-radio and the Repugs during the campaign to mock the widespread enthusiasm Magik Negro was drawing.
The envious Repugs would have loved to have McLiar and pitbull bitch draw the same enthusiasm, but after 8 years of total malfeasance and bad will from dubya and dickhead, the only enthusiasm McLiar got was from a trivial, ineffective minority, the mouth-foaming Repug hate-and-fear mongers.
Yeah.. that's pretty disgusting. Oh well, cable news is a joke... so it's not like anyone takes it seriously anyway.
yeah i know
so yall are saying obama ISNT god?
I've never tried the Ignore function, but I'm considering trying it... on boutons
Don't forget Clambake. the others I'd like to ignore sometimes have something good to say.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bender
Maybe a Goa'uld, but not a God.
Go[a'ul]d
possiblyQuote:
Originally Posted by George Gervin's Afro
what other countries will be doing at us.Quote:
Originally Posted by George Gervin's Afro
defend away...............
well i can kinda see why he said that. he is providing for that, literally, piss poor channel. he does provide for them. welcome to the cult of personality.
I actually remember the days where people reported the news without giving an opinion. :lol GOD!!!!!!!!
trust me WC. nobody has anything good to say about you.....and where's your whore?
This commentator has it all wrong. I'm god.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goa'uld...rs_in_StargateQuote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
Quote:
Most Goa'uld pose as gods to control slave armies and are considered evil, egocentric megalomaniacs by those who do not worship them. The Goa'uld are extremely intelligent and have an aptitude for understanding, working with and using technology that is unmatched. They each have full access to their species' genetic memory from the moment of birth, meaning that no Goa'uld has to learn how to work with any technological device; they 'know' how to do so innately.
I shall sacrifice twenty golden prius's on thine altar of his holiness.
That's not news. There isn't enough news to fill up a 24 hour production cycle, so naturally there's a lot of news related improvisation and free association. In the sports context it is called *color commentary*...Quote:
Originally Posted by jack sommerset
Which sometimes makes the news too. Did you hear what so and so said?
It's the functional equivalent of gossip IMO, but it is also an autoerotic clutch: reporting embraces itself as news, and swells to fill in the mostly empty news cycle.
Of course Obama's not god. For one thing, Obama actually exists.
If you're not sincere, she'll take your head as a pledge too.Quote:
Originally Posted by FaithInOne
http://spiritualvisionart.com/images/CHINNAMASTA.JPG
http://rlv.zcache.com/chinnamasta_ya...74t5qo_210.jpg
Chinnamasta yantra tees!
Speaking of sacrifice, a word Lord Obama tells Americans they should do every week...
I wish a safe and luxurious return to my lord and savior's Wife and Daughters as they conclude an extra day of overseas shopping.
Obama bless.
God forbid we should go without anything in a time of war, continuing financial default and relative scarcity.Quote:
Originally Posted by FaithInOne
LockBeard strikes the pose of the bogus believer. How typical.Quote:
I wish a safe and luxurious return to my lord and savior's Wife and Daughters as they conclude an extra day of overseas shopping.
You guys are hilariously obsessed.
Bored and hungover more like, for me.
[CHORUS]
Someone to claim us, someone to follow
Someone to shame us, some brave Apollo
Someone to fool us, someone like you
We want you Big Brother, Big Brother
Quote:
Religion. A daughter of Hope and Fear, explaining to Ignorance the nature of the Unknowable. --Ambrose Bierce.
you are right. it is old news now. it is also here to stay. it also influences some people who vote. some asshole today called me a robot. i think a stupid robot who listens to a certain program, you know the kind that just make up bullshit for dumb asses like me to spew to the world as if they are facts. where do u think people get that kind of shit to say about people. i watch nbc,fox,cnn,etc. i hear networks say say other networks lie. u watch fox and some people say u are a repulican dumb fuck and all fox does is lie. some actually blamed fox for that abortion doctors death. nbc has similar stories as well as others. it should not be like that. if i think obama spent too much of our money to go on what i think is a silly date night trip, i should be able to come to that conclusion all by myself. i should not hear because i think this is because i listen to a reporter tell me this is bad. so this ass fuck calls me stupid and my opinion means shit and now he will not reply to anything i have to say. that my friend in my humble opinion is because he himself listens to far left programs telling people who think like this are wrong. ironic or hypocritical i think.Quote:
Originally Posted by Winehole23
One vote for jack continuing his automatic writing experiment.
"Robot" is a pretty fair characterization. The only reason the right wing media pushed this story was to inflame rubes like you.
I wouldn't criticize a president for any single act of relaxation. It's a tough job and they are really always on the job.
+1Quote:
Originally Posted by winehole23
:lol I didn't know it was gonna bother you this much.Quote:
Originally Posted by jack sommerset
My political intake consists of about 95% conservative radio/Fox News and 5% MSNBC. I listen to Gallagher and Beck in the morning, I catch the first 30 minutes and last hour of Limbaugh / Dennis Prager, I try to listen to as much Medved as possible (he's my personal favorite, he's pretty fair and isn't afraid to criticize people who deserve it), some of Hannity when Medved is on commercial and if it's at night I'll listen to Dennis Miller or Michael Savage on KLUP.
I'll watch parts of the ED show every now and then... but only because Medved is a regular pundit and I like to hear him debate. Ed's voice and his constant ball sucking of Obama make him largely unwatchable otherwise.
I probably know the conservative talking points better than you do, but I can think independently and reject a lot of their view points on the basis of their ignorance... which is funny because that's the same ignorance they claim that liberals have. I don't say an opinion is bad because somebody told me so, I think an opinion is bad because I can use critical thinking to discern that for myself. When all the conservatives say the EXACT same thing on these boards which were said on conservative radio just a few hours before, it leaves me to come to the conclusion that that's where they get their ideas and thus the robot comment.
It's amazing how often this comes up in this forum. Bored republicans are so stuck on gay sex.Quote:
Originally Posted by jman3000
yes... because I'm soooo Republican.
It's a figure of speech, not some Freudian, repressed urge.
Perhaps, but it isn't quite a cliche either.Quote:
Originally Posted by jman3000
Maybe it will be someday.
Just for shits and giggles I did a search of "ball sucking" in the political forum and this thread was the only entry.
So the conservatives' use of homosexual imagery must be coming in a different form.
haha... i searched for ball sucking.
I've never let a girl suck my balls. Maybe I should. I'm just scared her chin will hit my ass and that'd pretty much ruin everything. I refuse to fuck shitty chins.
My question for board libs...doesn't it bother you guys to be in alignment on anything with boutons?
If I ever found myself sharing some type of similar belief system with boutons, I'd immediately stop it, and if I couldn't, I would take a shotgun and blow my fucking head off.
Couldn't a lib say the same thing about sharing a viewpoint with ducks?
Even though Boutons is kinda out there at least he can sometimes form coherent thoughts. ducks is pretty much the autistic mascot of the political forum.
Wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by jman3000
More LockBeard.Quote:
Liz Windsor
Oh, shut the fuck up, Gordy. I don't come to your job and slap Obama's dick out of your mouth. Listen folks, my time's up, and this tiara is chafing like a sonuvabitch. Time for me to lie back and think of England. Don't forget to tip your waitress!
Try slurp as a search term. timvp, under slurp. antihero, another LockBeard sock puppet?
Sucking reveals AHF. Again. Also, Kermit.
This is incredibly easy. Shall I go on?
No, in fact I actually like ducks...he's funny. boutons is not.Quote:
Originally Posted by jman3000
Quote:
Even though Boutons is kinda out there at least he can sometimes form coherent thoughts.
Coherency is over-rated in this instance IMHO.
You are both spurfans.Quote:
Originally Posted by whottt
"I would take a shotgun and blow my fucking head off."
I fully align myself with Whott-the-fuck on this excellent idea.
Whott is whining because I bitch slap him and his wrongie fellow-travellers daily and definitively.
Thank god! I didn't sleep very good last night. I was up all night thinking you would not ever respond to me. I'm going to work with a little extra hop today! Thank YOUUUUUUU.Quote:
Originally Posted by jman3000
That actually technically proved me right, since I did only search for "ball sucking" then immediately said that "it must be coming from another source".Quote:
Originally Posted by Winehole23
That other source is that guys infatuation with slurping and cocks. I take it he spent a few months as a Mark Foley intern or something.
I'd say ducks is more depressing than he is funny. The novelty of reading such retarded posts wears off after a while. It starts to get depressing knowing that there's adults out there who have his same brain functions.Quote:
Originally Posted by whottt
Technically, it proves me right too.Quote:
Originally Posted by jman3000
I made a general claim for *gay sex*, while you tendentiously narrowed the case down to ball sucking, and whimsically dismissed the generic possibilities of slurping.
I wouldn't go so far as to claim your statement was "general". You highlighted the term "constant ball sucking of Obama" and said "how often this" comes up. Which would leave a rational person to conclude the "this" was about "ball sucking of Obama". If you had said "how often gay sex comes up"... that'd be a different story.
Indefinite pronoun reference is a bitch, but I did elaborate.Quote:
Originally Posted by jman3000
*Bored posters are fixated on gay sex.*
I'm just gonna take the "win" and run.
It won't hurt my feelings if you run away and hide. :lol
All this "Obama is God/the Messiah/the Chosen One/Anointed One" stuff is complete shit. People are going to see what they want to see. They have predefined explanations of things, so that when they see something, it automatically goes to a negative instead of actually being thought out.
Oprah called him the Chosen One? Fuck sticks, all Hollywood liberals must think that way!
Farrakhan (sp?) calls him the Messiah and his congregation cheers? Shit bread, he must think he's the Messiah AND be a Muslim!
It's not that I'd be hiding... it's that I'm pretty sure I have the "W" and I don't want to be tripped up by the verboseness of your posts.Quote:
Originally Posted by Winehole23
Think Derrick Fisher running off the court after 0.4.
The Obama/soter meme is not elaborated ex nihilo, as supported by your examples.Quote:
Originally Posted by jman3000
It is based on something, even if that something does not support the grotesque overreading of the point and the inane repetition of that misreading.
Your gloss that people react to politics more emotionally than rationally and reflectively, while overrelying on the false precision of cliches is apt, if also prosaic IMO.
I do agree with you that political disputes often have a sort of mechanical predictability wrt cliche. Personally, I am less concerned that this is an expression of stupidity than alarmed that so many otherwise *wise and reflective* people get sucked into it.
That said, my feelings won't be hurt if you stick around either jman3000.
For some reason, your own *buzzer-beater* has not seared itself into my mind the way Fisher's did.Quote:
Originally Posted by jman3000
That's basically what I meant. I'm more concerned that people on both sides are letting others think for them... and it's all under the banner of "think for yourselves".
So think for yourselves as long as that thinking is like me. That's pointed mostly at the big 3 of Rush, Hannity, and Beck and somewhat towards Olbermann if just for his demonizing rants. The 2nd and 3rd tier conservatives, with the exception of Michael Savage, don't usually resort to that.
Give it time. It'll be like Manu's game 7 foul on Dirk. The more you think about it, the more it will enrage you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Winehole23
actually, the more I think about Manu's foul on Dirk, the more I get over it.Quote:
Originally Posted by jman3000
Why? He didn't have to be around him at all. There was no reason to contest it. If he makes the dunk, we're shooting free throws the rest of the way.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blake
I initially forgave him because he hit that huge 3 moments before, but the more I think about it the more I see how completely unnecessary it was.
You're holding a grudge just now? This is a prime example of why I think Spursfans are, in no small measure, hysterical and insane. We get bored in the off season, and start slagging Manu.Quote:
Originally Posted by jman3000
:lol
Bad analogy, I mean we're both biological organisms that breathe air too. It's different.Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
Politics OTOH is...it's more or less a belief system. A world view if you will. Not the same thing at all.
Furthermore, I'm much more of a Spurfan than he is...he is much more defined by his politics than I am.
I'l always got the impression that ducks is a shitty typist who posts drunk alot...Quote:
Originally Posted by jman3000
boutons OTOH...
That's more like some sort of militant dementia/senility, and not all that coherent to boot.Quote:
Originally Posted by boutons_deux
On the contrary, spurfandom at this level is a belief system, though we have several sects.Quote:
Originally Posted by whottt
because for one, it's a team game. The Mavs shot something crazy like 70% in the first half so there is plenty of blame to go around.Quote:
Originally Posted by jman3000
The play was also the type of instinct play that Manu always tries to make. The Spurs have lived and died by the Manu, so him making a mistake like that is forgivable considering that he was a big reason for the title the year before and the year after.
Let it go....
I'm beginning to wonder.Quote:
Originally Posted by whottt
No offense, but both of you just argued about gay sex for almost a full page of postings.Quote:
Originally Posted by jman3000
I don't care what side of the political fence you're on, that's some damn funny stuff right there. :lol
Interesting. While I won't ask you to explain the beliefs of the other Spursfandom sects, I would be interested in hearing yours, and boutons' for that matter.Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
What is it exactly that you "Believe.".
Hey, thanks for repeating our mantra.Quote:
Originally Posted by whottt
:tu
Not that there's anything wrong with that. :lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Cry Havoc
jman denied it even exists here. That I was making it all up, or something like that.
My own brief urged prevalence, based on the verbal traces to be found in*politics* alone. Everybody can decide for himself what to believe. IMO there are way too many ostensible*studs* talking about gay stuff. I just find it a little weird, and maybe a little sad, that this is an ongoing theme here.
Fify WH23 :) :toast :lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Winehole23
Well played, LnGrrrR. :lolQuote:
Originally Posted by LnGrrrR
I never denied it didn't exist. I was refuting your assertion that "sucking on balls" had been a common theme in this forum. It actually wasn't.
Slurping cock, and jizz popped up a bunch ... but no "sucking on balls". I was arguing against a technicality and knew I had solid standing so I went with it.
Was I just called a "stud"?
By all means, continue to gloat over your narrow, technical *victory*.Quote:
Originally Posted by jman3000
Strut your bulletin board glory for as long as it lasts jman. Life is long, the limelight, fleeting.
Cheers,
WH23
*struts*
Accepted.Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper