Printable View
LMAO at you thinking it was ever about Wade or Lebron...Quote:
Originally Posted by Shastafarian
Money to sign Tiago Splitter for one.
Plenty of talented players to choose from along with using the MLE.
Gives the Spurs more time to evaluate Manu.
See what shakes loose once the big chips fall.
The 2010 plan was about building a contender for Duncan's last years.
Don't worry about Big Baby.. the Mahinmi+Blair tandem is going to be awesome enough to hold down the front court :drunk
Richard Jefferson is likely a better player than SA could have gotten in 2010 by blowing off this season and waiting...and SA basically got him without having to give up anything. If they want Bowen or Oberto back they can choose that. so it was a good deal all on its ownQuote:
Originally Posted by DPG21920
We dont know what is going to happen the rest of the offseason anyway. this report is certainly not a done deal
Thanks for the minor correction! But for the MLE, at his young age coupled with what he's already done ON A WINNING TEAM, NOT A LOTTERY TEAM, he could be steal and THEN SOME for the MLE.Quote:
Originally Posted by timvp
Very shrewd FO, passing on Sheed, and taking Davis, if this is true!
I think San Antonio is going to have to pay enough to get Baby. If they only offer him like 3 million, Boston will match. So this is not a sure thing yet.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shastafarian
He is their young guy. If he comes for the LLE, then great. But that is not very likely now is it. He would command most of the MLE and he would be the premier big by Tim.
No rookie without experience that is paid less than him would take that spot.
Would you rather they didn't sign anyone else this year? That along with renouncing the RJ deal and you'd be happy?Quote:
Originally Posted by DPG21920
:hangQuote:
Originally Posted by Shastafarian
baby was pretty darn good in the playoffs (against two of the weakest front lines in the league) - but he has been nothing short of bad his first two years in the league otherwise.
he would be one of my absolute last choices of players on the market.
We're fucked.
It's all that ugly ass Scola's fault.
Common sense again....for someone on this forum!!Quote:
Originally Posted by DPG21920
Thanks, DPG21920!!!
:toast
Bass is a better rebounder wow.
:lol According to who? He was a bench player in Boston and he'd likely have to play for a starting spot with a new team.Quote:
Originally Posted by DPG21920
Why in the world would the Spurs go after Big Baby, I'd much rather have a vet like Dyess and shore up the bench with youth...shesh this crying dude will surely have the spurs ....forget it!!!
We need .....ahh
And you really think they'd sign Splitter for more than the MLE?
Still tougher than any pic Karl Malone ever took.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spursmania
To compare . . .Quote:
Originally Posted by timvp
Brandon Bass Per 36 Minutes
8.4 rebounds
1.3 blocks
Did I say it was? I clearly said IF the Big Baby report is true, I do not like it. I am not judging until it happens.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sii
I understand why they made the trade. I am the one who wrote about a trade like this a long time ago. I wanted this type of trade, but only if it leads to other moves that give the Spurs a legit shot. That was the only reason why the plan should have been abandoned. Baby is not good enough.
It would make it very difficult to go another direction when it fails (if baby signs for the MLE).
I also said that I like the RJ trade in isolation. But that is not the point I am trying to make.
:lolQuote:
Originally Posted by baseline bum
Big Baby cried in a game last year.
enough said.
heres to hoping for Bass over Davis :downspin:
fuck plzno. Glenn Davis looks like a overweight slug running on the court. He is the last person I want, I'd take Rasho over him
:frying:Quote:
Originally Posted by timvp
Well, this would be the worst case scenario for the organization. There's something about this FO that just fails at FA acquisition.
What happened to those giddy days of the Jefferson trade and Blair drafting. pooofff