Re: White Man's Last Stand
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wild Cobra
You are taking that to in incorrect extreme. I would never presume I know more about all subjects to make proper rulings. I have simply paid attention to other reverses discrimination cases.
Why don't you address what I said? Especially the city's failure to do a post assessment of the test?
I will likely be accurate in assuming they didn't do that because it would prove there was no bias in the test. They didn't like the outcome, so they threw the test out.
Again, if they did the post review, and found problems, I would not be so adamant.
The court though can't mandate the city does such a test, can they? The court is just working with the facts presented, AFAIK. And per what I've read, the disparate impact COULD be used against the city.
As well, even a wrong decision in this case does not, to me, immediately disqualify her as a potential justice. Current SCOTUS justices have made improper and incorrect rulings, and to assume perfection from them is a non-starter.
If you disagree with her because of her preference for affirmative action, that's fine. But you continuously try to point to her as unqualified due to this one decision, or that she is biased towards Caucasians, or any number of other things.
Re: White Man's Last Stand
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DarrinS
I'll summarise her article for you.
The GOP is a group of cranky, old, racist white men.
Bush lied, people died. Cheney is the antiChrist.
Bush stole the 2000 election.
Sarah Palin is dumb.
You say that as if anything there is inaccurate...
Re: White Man's Last Stand
Quote:
Originally Posted by
RandomGuy
You say that as if anything there is inaccurate...
That was supposed to be Manny's response, but, I guess great minds think alike. :rolleyes
