Because it could come down to that, although seems unlikely we bring SJ back to me. Let's assume a healthy Manu to make this easier.
Disclaimer: Apologies in advance to the inevitable person that believes this unworthy of a thread. :lol
Printable View
Because it could come down to that, although seems unlikely we bring SJ back to me. Let's assume a healthy Manu to make this easier.
Disclaimer: Apologies in advance to the inevitable person that believes this unworthy of a thread. :lol
I wish there was a rule to inhibit 1000 less posters to open threads... nothing personal dude... :wakeup
Edit: I have an even better idea. How about a 1000 less posts usernames have their threads approved before being published?
Did you really think no one read this in the other thread?
They did -- they just didn't care.
I know.. I've asked about this, but the people who run the site don't seem to care..Quote:
Originally Posted by urunobili
You'd think they would save themselves a lot of trouble of having to close stupid threads
like these if they added some sort of feature that would prohibit noobs
from posting.
100% healthy?
Ginobili, not even a question.
/thread
these threads are multiplying like Guatemalans
:ownedQuote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
I already apologized so go fuck yourself dickhead. And no offense taken, I appreciate the feedback. Thank goodness my manhood is much larger than my post count eh? Any consolation I have posted under a different ID, so it is higher than the total you saw that is so all important. My allegiance to the Spurs goes back to the Iceman era, ya turd. I have attended games since the 70s.Quote:
Originally Posted by urunobili
Now does anybody have anything more intelligent to say than this idiot faggot urunobili? LOL
Good lord, not this again.
That would be meQuote:
Originally Posted by Knoxxx
Why would it come to that?Quote:
Originally Posted by Knoxxx
Rayray, you seem like yet another condescending dork that this site is littered with. I do not scroll past the first page hunting for threads that might be similar.Quote:
Originally Posted by rayray2k8
Really, dipshits like your need to get over youself and your sensitive little "OMG its a duplicate thread, the horror, the horror, I'm gonna tell a mod, what a turd this guys is" attitude. Lame.
Internet tough guy? :lol I'll be in San Antonio in October... anytime...Quote:
Originally Posted by Knoxxx
you're welcome my boyQuote:
Originally Posted by Knoxxx
proof?.Quote:
Originally Posted by Knoxxx
So you're just trolling... :wakeupQuote:
Originally Posted by Knoxxx
so then you're an old fat ass internet tough guy? :lmao dude?! :lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Knoxxx
Faggot indeed... ask your father...Quote:
Originally Posted by Knoxxx
e-fight!!!!
jackson, since we dont live in a fantasy world where manu is healthy
Well even if you did not scroll past the first page like you claim, there are two other SJax threads this can be posted in:
http://spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=131926
http://spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=131922
So what now?
:lmao
:lolQuote:
Originally Posted by DPG21920
Seems to me the writing is on the wall, no way to afford the salaries of TD/TP/RJ + Manu and S Jax in 2010 that I can see. Main obstacle being that RJ will make $15 million in 2010.Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven
I'll take the american at 1-5Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven
That would be all of us.Quote:
Originally Posted by I. Hustle
Careful now before he inevitably starts name calling and claims how long he's been
a spurs fan.
Oh wait, he already did. :lol
Very mature. Cheers to you. :toast
You don't have to. There is a search feature.Quote:
Originally Posted by Knoxxx
there is no question about it. its manu
Hey, I am in that number, and still completely agree.Quote:
Originally Posted by urunobili
If a man thinks he has something worthwhile to offer, let him prove himself 1000 times before granting him the right to express it. If what he has to say is worthy, we will say it was worth the wait...if not, then we saved ourselves the hassle of calling him an imbecile.
Better to remain silent and thought a fool, than to open one's mouth and remove all doubt.
:lmaoQuote:
Originally Posted by Knoxxx
You mad??
its pretty easy to be a spurs fan longer than an argentine if youre older than 14
I do not think there should be a post limit. I am a patient guy and help out as much as I can normally because I went through some of the same stuff. But at least read the first page and see if there is a topic discussing what you want.
Some new people do not know how to use the search function, especially if it is their first time being part of an online forum. But at least look on the first page.
and the troll of the day award goes to... Knoxxx
congratulations!
Except you were already in one of the threads.Quote:
Originally Posted by Knoxxx
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knoxxx
If Spurs dump Manu I am done with the Spurs.
Is that the same if he retires with the club?Quote:
Originally Posted by SonOfAGun
good post :tuQuote:
Originally Posted by mikeb2016
Don;t get me wrong we have been blessed to have 1 post users break news and add awesome perspective etc... some of them insiders too... but still getting to know the game a little better before coaching makes sense... that's all... i truly wouldn't like to be on the mods shoes all day...
Some people just like to take the opportunity to be a tough guy in the cyberworld. Maybe because they can't be in real life?
Geeze people!!! I'll never understand the constant bitching about this. No one forces you to read the thread. Last time I checked it was a free country where you did not have to read what you don't want to read. On top of that You, yes you were the one that posted in a thread you did not like. Now how silly is that? IF it's so bad, just don't post in it and let it die because you also take alot of the responsibility of letting a lame thread stay active.
Anyway just a small rant =P
No shit??!! :lolQuote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
So he's an attention whore then? The whole forum is ready to take a collective shit on this guy. XD
Where's my bash stick??
no existis mookie...Quote:
Originally Posted by mookie2001
Dang you are such a badass!Quote:
Originally Posted by DPG21920
There are also other similar threads floating around on other topics that I did not start, and you know what, I've been on the Internet for at least a decade, message boards most of that time, and IT DOES NOT BOTHER ME ONE TINY BIT.
In fact, ya'll dweebs that try to shame people and make them scared to death to start a thread, can piss off for all I care.
Do me a favor, if you are one of those dweebs, and stay the hell off my threads! If nobody else is interested, the thread will dwindle off and go away.
As far as I am concerned, my topic is 100% valid, focused on the issue of the consequences of an S Jax versus Manu retiring a Spur. If you don't like that, go post on the "S Jax trade target" thread or whatever you want to do.
I am fully aware of the search feature and what types of threads are out there, and my apology at the start was basically an "FU" in advance to the dickhead responses that in my opinion detract from this site.
OK I think that about covers it from my perspective. I think aholes with too many damn posts needs to get a life and quit hassling those of us that do, so there.
It makes the forum difficult to read and pushes good threads off the page. Not to mention (if you do it in a reasonably polite way) it helps to let people know what they are doing is wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chomag
I agree if a topic is stupid or inflammatory (but there are no others like it), just do not post in it and let it die. But when there are multiple threads on the same subject one after another, someone has to say a little something so the forum learns.
Goddamnit, rack this dude! Best post I've ever read from a "noob". Already ahead of the curve.Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeb2016
You're okay in my book buddy. :tu
http://robotpirateninja.files.wordpr..._tough_guy.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by Knoxxx
Knoxxx reminds me of KBP without the bad english attempts, if you call them out they both go on a verbal attack.
I was not rude to you. I just showed you that very similar topics existed on the first page. So you were lying essentially to cover up a mistake. You did not even bother to look on the first page. No big deal.Quote:
Originally Posted by Knoxxx
Didn't you post this exact "thread" as a post in one of the other threads? Why then would you start a new thread?
http://www.voiceofarizona.com/users/..._caps_lock.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by Knoxxx
So in protest of people telling you what to do, you are telling people what to do.Quote:
Originally Posted by Knoxxx
Again, my opinion about what is a different angle worthy of starting a thread is as valid as anybody else's. I appreciate your point, and I am aware of it. However, I took that into account before daring to start a thread.Quote:
Originally Posted by DPG21920
As far as Spurs contacts, yes I have them. Am I actively using them right now? No. Regardless, most people do not and I don't think any less of them for it. People without Spurs inside info have every right to start a thread, in fact it makes this place better.
Yep! ^_^Quote:
Originally Posted by DPG21920
the troll claims to be a Spurs insider? :lmao
now I've seen it all...
The point was obvious and made by posters other than me, stay off the thread and it goes away. I'm not looking to pick a fight with anyone, first post right off the bat came after me in a critical fashion and I am just firing back a bit. There are many who feel just the same as me.Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
:lol HilariousQuote:
Originally Posted by MaNu4Tres
I don't know dude. I saw the other guys myspace pageQuote:
Originally Posted by mookie2001
http://www.doknowevil.net/wp-content....thumbnail.jpg He looks tough
What does this have to do with anything? Yes anyone can start a thread; but please look on the first page to see if your thread is similar to any others. If so, do not start another one.Quote:
Originally Posted by Knoxxx
Once again, not a big deal, just trying to save you from getting royally flamed. That is all.
the only reason anyones chodes swell over this thread is because it gives people a chance to say something mildly negative about manu, but if you want to start a roster, lineup, whos making the cut?, just a thought, roster question, timduncan is a center, tim duncan is a powerforward, why isnt tim duncan listed as a center? thread, go ahead
ok as we cant be delighted with your info...Quote:
Originally Posted by Knoxxx
can you please tell us what you else you bring to this board? :wakeup
(apart from a thread that equals a bad post on any other out there)
:loser
So they have your back in the inevitable e-rumble?Quote:
Originally Posted by Knoxxx
:lolQuote:
Originally Posted by MaNu4Tres
that would be somewhat funny is someone had used capslock
Pffffff. Wrong. They get sarcasmed to death by you. Not to mention Kori has locked threads about the Duncan position thing. At least the "roster" posts are usually within a certain thread, not brand new threads.Quote:
Originally Posted by mookie2001
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaNu4Tres
LOL, nice. I'm not even close to being "mad" about this, just placing a little emphasis and don't agree with the way people treat others on here. That I swore at a few folks I am not proud of, but they had it coming. Swearing is allowed, and it was just self defense from my perspective.
so then the only thing wrong with this thread is that he started it after asking in a another thread?
That and there were two other SJax threads on the first page.
Were it the only superfluous Jack thread today, it wouldn't have been as big a deal.
Are you kidding? This is an Internet message board, what's to be mad about unless you are an (OMG) newby! I threw around some bad language because that seems to be what people understand and relate to most on here. Apparently tu comprendo.Quote:
Originally Posted by rayray2k8
This is a Manu vs. S Jax thread, let's get back on topic. I think Manu has a lot left in the tank and far more intangibles than S Jax. Sure I would like Jax on the team, but does not seem feasible financially and Manu is my choice hands down.
dude you are not as knowledgeable Spur fan as you say if you don't know the answer to your question in the title.Quote:
Originally Posted by Knoxxx
of course Manu >>>> Jax
internet tough guy?Quote:
Originally Posted by urunobili
sorry its debatable and manu certainly isnt 4 times betterQuote:
Manu >>>> Jax
+ 10000Quote:
Originally Posted by nkdlunch
close thread.
That is why I'm thinking let's rule out S Jax. We can't afford him, RJ, and Manu in 2010. My point was to make people understand that. S Jax = no go financially unless we swap him out for Manu after 2009. Now, it is feasible to have both on the roster this year, and maybe that is worth it for a title, saying goodbye to Manu. Difficult question, and not one that everyone seems to understand.Quote:
Originally Posted by nkdlunch
Wh-what? :lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Knoxxx
I'm ignoring all the SJAX threads at this point. You wanna be realistic?
Go there.
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine
Make it happen. Then realize you'd have to give up more than 2 guys to complete this trade.
If you try to add in Manu, prepare to get hounded by Ginobili fans.
It just doesn't work and makes no sense when the Spurs already Jefferson on the team!
And yes, you were mad. :lmao I wasn't the one name calling people to begin with.
Oh god, there was no point to starting this thread to begin with. I didn't read the thread starters post and went
into "instant flamming mode". :lol
This could have been easily avoided had you just kept the conversation in 1 thread. Hopefully the merge these threads
soon, which they probably will.
They don't limit the posters to a certain amount because sometimes lurkers get some breaking news before the rest of us, and if they can't post it, we won't have it. But yes..this would definitely qualify as one of those threads that just don't belong. It would definitely call for a DOUBLE facepalm..
http://bum.net/pics/facepalm2.jpg
This from a guy with numerous large irritating pictures in his profile on every freakin' post is laughable.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spursfan092120
The guy going through and quoting every one of my sentences and responding to it, pretty damn funny too!
Some of you guys are a riot! Hilarious how great you think your mighty thousand posts and opinions are so superior. Thanks for the entertainment, although was just looking to talk about the topic.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mookie2001
Well we can debate this issue all day, and anyone on Jackson's side can be wrong if they wish, but mathematically, Ginobili is at least 4 times better than Jack.
Manu = http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:...rientrophy.jpg http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:...rientrophy.jpg http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:...rientrophy.jpg http://tbn3.google.com/images?q=tbn:...8/T028920A.jpg
Jackson= http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:...rientrophy.jpg
Good points about S Jax not being feasible, that was precisely the conclusion I came to. You worry too much though ray about merging threads and the like. Relax a little. I think the people who stress over that cause more harm than good, and are the ones trying to do the bullying. The people that don't mind don't express that sentiment because then they just get attacked. So there was a little more going on here than just me getting mad, or whatever. I will never stoop to degarding someone for starting a thread. I just don't agree with that perspective on this. There is always gonna be "clutter" in the opinion of someone.Quote:
Originally Posted by rayray2k8
This thread is full of:jack.
/ thread
large irritating pictures in my profile? I don't have any pictures in my profile..thanks though. No one thinks we're superior, douchebag...we just think it's ignorant to take a guy like Manu, who is a penetrator, exactly what the Spurs need, and trade him away for a guy who jacks up shots, exactly what the Spurs DON'T need. I know everybody gets a hard on for Jax, and he's a great player..but we need someone who can get in the paint..Tony can't do it all by himself. Manu is a clutch player, and is a catalyst for this team...everyone knows that with a healthy Manu, we are a contender..if he's not healthy, we're in trouble. So why would we give that player up? And for someone who's going around telling everyone to stop being rude to people, talk about the pot calling the kettle black. I never said one rude thing to you, and yet you feel the need to bash my posting. If you're going to start a thread in a message board, you have to learn to expect that not EVERYONE is going to LOVE your ideas, and because it's a message board, they are going to let you know how they feel. If you're gonna be a whiney little girl about it, don't start them in the first place. You already posted this in another thread, and nobody responded to it. This should give you an idea that nobody wanted to talk about it. In turn, posting it as it's own thread turns you into a :troll. Then you tell everyone to get off their high horse, when in reality, you telling everyone what they need to do is getting on YOUR high horse. So please...stop doing what you want everyone else to stop doing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Knoxxx
Amen brother, go back and look at some of the the Gino highlights, what a stud!Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeb2016
Question though, once again, is it worth it to have Manu + Jack in 2009, then only Jack and no Manu from 2010-2012, due to inability to afford Manu contract after this year?
We would be the clear favorite with the addition of Jax for some of our lesser players. An NBA title in 2009, then Jax instead of Manu from 2010 on through 2012? Hmmm.....
I think I'm superior, but not because of the post count.
:lmao:lmaoQuote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
I agree 100% about Manu's worth and appreciate your comments you dickhead. Unfortunate that we have to cuss each other out to have an "intelligent" discussion but whatever it takes. All these cliches about trolls and whiny girls, that is a bit tiresome but OK. It is not rude to defend myself against an unjustified attack in my opinion. Thank you for allowing me to shame you into removing those pictures, they are clearly present in the post I quoted and damn sure were irritating. Maybe you will succeed in permanently erasing them, but I am sure others know what I am talking about. So I hope you can get them permanently erased, that is the clutter on here that is far more irritating than any duplicate threads.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spursfan092120
What about trading our 2010-12 future for S Jax over Manu, so that 2009 might be a "lock" for a title? To me that is a hard question.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knoxxx
Somehow that assumes that the FO will not resign Manu, and that is asinine. The only way Manu is not re-signed is if he becomes physically unable to play, the Spurs go bankrupt or Manu comes up with a bad case of Iwanttoplayinternationalbasketballitis. If the first happens, then the Spurs will cross that bridge when they come to it, if the second happens, they can't even afford Jack, and if the third happens then something really bad happened between TimmyD, Pop and Manu, and it probably started when someone said something about Stephen Jackson coming back to the Spurs.
I won't argue that if you can get Jackson for Finley, Bonner, et al, then you do it...but only if you can afford it long term, and only if you think that he can fit in as the 4th, 5th or 6th option. But never in lieu of Manu...
Well I don't think in those better or worse poster terms, this is not a competition to me, its a discussion board about our favorite NBA team.Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
WTF...is this 'every retard can start their own thread' day at Spurstalk???
Damn.......
OK..here we go again..I didn't insult you..and I refuse to stoop to your level to do so. I didn't remove any pictures...if you're talking about the pictures on my sig, they will remain, just like everyone else's. They don't show up on every post in a thread...I will not delete them. If you have a problem with a picture of me and my wife in Jamaica, Roy Williams, The Spurs, and The Cowboys, don't read my posts...period. Your sig is supposed to be something that means something to you. If you don't want pictures in your sig, that's fine...but what you're doing is exactly what you're getting on other people for doing. You don't want people to bash your posts, yet you're bashing a sig? Come on dude...wake up and stop being hypocritical. No one has ever had a problem with my sig until you...and if you have a problem with people having opinions about threads you start, you don't need to be on a message board. Simple fact. If you put yourself out there and start a thread, people who disagree are going to let you know...that's part of being on a message board. If you want a bunch of yes men, you're on the wrong forum. And if you think SJax is going to be a better player after 2009 than Manu, that's fine..think that way..but it's still not what the Spurs need. We need a slasher...not a chucker.Quote:
Originally Posted by Knoxxx
Then maybe you should stop insulting people for having opinions or what pictures they have on their sig and start talking about said team.Quote:
Originally Posted by Knoxxx
I know, right? Dude starts a thread displaying basketball ignorance, and then bashes everyone for bashing it. Hmm...then he says we shouldn't be bashing each other.....wait a minute.....KBP?!?!Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Helicopter Jones
You guys waste a lot of energy just to express a few good comments, sheesh. No I don't want to see your pictures, I'm not interested in your personal life at all. What is clutter is a matter of opinion. Bottom line is it is allowed though (pics), just like starting a thread is. I would never have even brought the pics up until you came after me, and don't deny it. Now get rid of those pictures, they suck! :kingQuote:
Originally Posted by Spursfan092120
As far as debate and differing opinions, that is 200% fine with me, but the attacks for starting a thread are not, and we can spin this "hypocrite" allegation either direction.
S-Jax was cool, but Manu all the way.
I didn't start this, I was attacked just for having the audacity to start a thread. That ain't right. There has been some decent discussion on here, despite the carnival side show.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spursfan092120
You can turn of signatures in your control panel.Quote:
Originally Posted by Knoxxx
I'll say it again..if you don't want to see the pictures..don't look. If you're anal about sigs, then once more, you're in the wrong place. People have a lot larger sigs than I do, and one person's shallow opinion isn't going to make me remove them. You're the first person in all the time I've had this sig that has a problem with it. I never attacked you...I said it was a stupid thread...you attacked me personally...I'm not the one getting up on my high horse telling everyone they need to stop bashing each other's posts, and then telling someone they need to take the pictures out of their sig because they suck. That's hypocritical. Now...go ahead and explain how I was hypocritical..can't wait to hear it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Knoxxx
You say this is supposed to be a forum about our favorite team, but the only thing you've discussed with me is my sig...that shows that you had no intentions of discussing our team. Your "feel sorry for me" routine isn't going to work. Some people on here have actual conversations with each other. THOSE people care about their personal lives. If you're not a part of it, that's fine. You can very simply turn sigs off and not have to see them, instead of bashing people for wanting to show what's important to them to people who they enjoy talking to.Quote:
Originally Posted by Knoxxx
That's the second time you try to goad urunobili by trying to insult Argies, which would work... if it wasn't for the fact that he is from fucking URUGUAY!! Not that you'd know the difference, what with you being an ignorant fuck and all.Quote:
Originally Posted by mookie2001
URINEOBILI: I have an alternative suggestion. Anyone with more than 2000 posts should be banned & have to take 3 months off in rehab. URINEOBILE has posted an average of 200 times a day for 30 months. Get a life, wife, ho, full time 12 hour job, significant other or a dog. Instead of 1000 posts as the standard, why don't we all submit our SAT scores and sexual orientation. Thank God for the First Amendment!
The first amendment doesn't apply to the moderation of private message boards.
Manu over Jax any day of the week and twice on Sunday
Thanks. The ones that suck are the ones that cause the scroll wheel not to work because they are too big to fit in the frame. So I am scrolling down and then have to click and drag on account of some BS I don't care about. Right up there with the pop up ad to me.Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
I don't want or need any sympathy. Simply stating a fact, start a thread and attacks came. I was in no mood and wasted no time firing back. All I ever wanted to do was talk about the topic, but I don't like being dissed either, who does? I do feel a little sorry for you being that sensitive about your signature line, so I'll apologize about that. I think you came in highly sarcastic at about the wrong time though, and my response was in line with that, nothing more. If you think my response was unwarranted than sorry about that, again I felt it about an even exchange and we have to be able to give and take to survive on here! I am not about denigrating you as a human being, or anyone else (other than perhaps uruginobili).Quote:
Originally Posted by Spursfan092120