-
Re: Manu or S Jax, who would you rather have?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mookie2001
I'll take the american at 1-5
I don't know dude. I saw the other guys myspace page
http://www.doknowevil.net/wp-content....thumbnail.jpg He looks tough
-
Re: Manu or S Jax, who would you rather have?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Knoxxx
Again, my opinion about what is a different angle worthy of starting a thread is as valid as anybody else's. I appreciate your point, and I am aware of it. However, I took that into account before daring to start a thread.
As far as Spurs contacts, yes I have them. Am I actively using them right now? No. Regardless, most people do not and I don't think any less of them for it. People without Spurs inside info have every right to start a thread, in fact it makes this place better.
What does this have to do with anything? Yes anyone can start a thread; but please look on the first page to see if your thread is similar to any others. If so, do not start another one.
Once again, not a big deal, just trying to save you from getting royally flamed. That is all.
-
Re: Manu or S Jax, who would you rather have?
the only reason anyones chodes swell over this thread is because it gives people a chance to say something mildly negative about manu, but if you want to start a roster, lineup, whos making the cut?, just a thought, roster question, timduncan is a center, tim duncan is a powerforward, why isnt tim duncan listed as a center? thread, go ahead
-
Re: Manu or S Jax, who would you rather have?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Knoxxx
As far as Spurs contacts, yes I have them. Am I actively using them right now? No. Regardless, most people do not and I don't think any less of them for it. People without Spurs inside info have every right to start a thread, in fact it makes this place better.
ok as we cant be delighted with your info...
can you please tell us what you else you bring to this board? :wakeup
(apart from a thread that equals a bad post on any other out there)
:loser
-
Re: Manu or S Jax, who would you rather have?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Knoxxx
The point was obvious and made by posters other than me, stay off the thread and it goes away. I'm not looking to pick a fight with anyone, first post right off the bat came after me in a critical fashion and I am just firing back a bit. There are many who feel just the same as me.
So they have your back in the inevitable e-rumble?
-
Re: Manu or S Jax, who would you rather have?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
MaNu4Tres
:lol
-
Re: Manu or S Jax, who would you rather have?
that would be somewhat funny is someone had used capslock
-
Re: Manu or S Jax, who would you rather have?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mookie2001
the only reason anyones chodes swell over this thread is because it gives people a chance to say something mildly negative about manu, but if you want to start a roster, lineup, whos making the cut?, just a thought, roster question, timduncan is a center, tim duncan is a powerforward, why isnt tim duncan listed as a center? thread, go ahead
Pffffff. Wrong. They get sarcasmed to death by you. Not to mention Kori has locked threads about the Duncan position thing. At least the "roster" posts are usually within a certain thread, not brand new threads.
-
Re: Manu or S Jax, who would you rather have?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
MaNu4Tres
LOL, nice. I'm not even close to being "mad" about this, just placing a little emphasis and don't agree with the way people treat others on here. That I swore at a few folks I am not proud of, but they had it coming. Swearing is allowed, and it was just self defense from my perspective.
-
Re: Manu or S Jax, who would you rather have?
so then the only thing wrong with this thread is that he started it after asking in a another thread?
-
Re: Manu or S Jax, who would you rather have?
That and there were two other SJax threads on the first page.
-
Re: Manu or S Jax, who would you rather have?
Were it the only superfluous Jack thread today, it wouldn't have been as big a deal.
-
Re: Manu or S Jax, who would you rather have?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
rayray2k8
:lmao
You mad??
Are you kidding? This is an Internet message board, what's to be mad about unless you are an (OMG) newby! I threw around some bad language because that seems to be what people understand and relate to most on here. Apparently tu comprendo.
This is a Manu vs. S Jax thread, let's get back on topic. I think Manu has a lot left in the tank and far more intangibles than S Jax. Sure I would like Jax on the team, but does not seem feasible financially and Manu is my choice hands down.
-
Re: Manu or S Jax, who would you rather have?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Knoxxx
Are you kidding? This is an Internet message board, what's to be mad about unless you are an (OMG) newby! I threw around some bad language because that seems to be what people understand and relate to most on here. Apparently tu comprendo.
This is a Manu vs. S Jax thread, let's get back on topic. I think Manu has a lot left in the tank and far more intangibles than S Jax. Sure I would like Jax on the team, but does not seem feasible financially and Manu is my choice hands down.
dude you are not as knowledgeable Spur fan as you say if you don't know the answer to your question in the title.
of course Manu >>>> Jax
-
Re: Manu or S Jax, who would you rather have?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
urunobili
Internet tough guy? :lol I'll be in San Antonio in October... anytime...
internet tough guy?
-
Re: Manu or S Jax, who would you rather have?
sorry its debatable and manu certainly isnt 4 times better
-
Re: Manu or S Jax, who would you rather have?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
nkdlunch
dude you are not as knowledgeable spur fan as you say if you don't know the answer to your question in the title.
Of course manu >>>> jax
+ 10000
-
Re: Manu or S Jax, who would you rather have?
-
Re: Manu or S Jax, who would you rather have?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
nkdlunch
dude you are not as knowledgeable Spur fan as you say if you don't know the answer to your question in the title.
of course Manu >>>> Jax
That is why I'm thinking let's rule out S Jax. We can't afford him, RJ, and Manu in 2010. My point was to make people understand that. S Jax = no go financially unless we swap him out for Manu after 2009. Now, it is feasible to have both on the roster this year, and maybe that is worth it for a title, saying goodbye to Manu. Difficult question, and not one that everyone seems to understand.
-
Re: Manu or S Jax, who would you rather have?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Knoxxx
Are you kidding? This is an Internet message board, what's to be mad about unless you are an (OMG) newby! I threw around some bad language because that seems to be what people understand and relate to most on here. Apparently tu comprendo.
This is a Manu vs. S Jax thread, let's get back on topic. I think Manu has a lot left in the tank and far more intangibles than S Jax. Sure I would like Jax on the team, but does not seem feasible financially and Manu is my choice hands down.
Wh-what? :lol
I'm ignoring all the SJAX threads at this point. You wanna be realistic?
Go there.
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine
Make it happen. Then realize you'd have to give up more than 2 guys to complete this trade.
If you try to add in Manu, prepare to get hounded by Ginobili fans.
It just doesn't work and makes no sense when the Spurs already Jefferson on the team!
And yes, you were mad. :lmao I wasn't the one name calling people to begin with.
Oh god, there was no point to starting this thread to begin with. I didn't read the thread starters post and went
into "instant flamming mode". :lol
This could have been easily avoided had you just kept the conversation in 1 thread. Hopefully the merge these threads
soon, which they probably will.
-
Re: Manu or S Jax, who would you rather have?
They don't limit the posters to a certain amount because sometimes lurkers get some breaking news before the rest of us, and if they can't post it, we won't have it. But yes..this would definitely qualify as one of those threads that just don't belong. It would definitely call for a DOUBLE facepalm..
http://bum.net/pics/facepalm2.jpg
-
Re: Manu or S Jax, who would you rather have?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Spursfan092120
They don't limit the posters to a certain amount because sometimes lurkers get some breaking news before the rest of us, and if they can't post it, we won't have it. But yes..this would definitely qualify as one of those threads that just don't belong. It would definitely call for a DOUBLE facepalm..
http://bum.net/pics/facepalm2.jpg
This from a guy with numerous large irritating pictures in his profile on every freakin' post is laughable.
The guy going through and quoting every one of my sentences and responding to it, pretty damn funny too!
Some of you guys are a riot! Hilarious how great you think your mighty thousand posts and opinions are so superior. Thanks for the entertainment, although was just looking to talk about the topic.
-
Re: Manu or S Jax, who would you rather have?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mookie2001
sorry its debatable and manu certainly isnt 4 times better
Well we can debate this issue all day, and anyone on Jackson's side can be wrong if they wish, but mathematically, Ginobili is at least 4 times better than Jack.
Manu = http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:...rientrophy.jpg http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:...rientrophy.jpg http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:...rientrophy.jpg http://tbn3.google.com/images?q=tbn:...8/T028920A.jpg
Jackson= http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:...rientrophy.jpg
-
Re: Manu or S Jax, who would you rather have?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
rayray2k8
Wh-what? :lol
I'm ignoring all the SJAX threads at this point. You wanna be realistic?
Go there.
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine
Make it happen. Then realize you'd have to give up more than 2 guys to complete this trade.
If you try to add in Manu, prepare to get hounded by Ginobili fans.
It just doesn't work and makes no sense when the Spurs already Jefferson on the team!
And yes, you were mad. :lmao I wasn't the one name calling people to begin with.
Oh god, there was no point to starting this thread to begin with. I didn't read the thread starters post and went
into "instant flamming mode". :lol
This could have been easily avoided had you just kept the conversation in 1 thread. Hopefully the merge these threads
soon, which they probably will.
Good points about S Jax not being feasible, that was precisely the conclusion I came to. You worry too much though ray about merging threads and the like. Relax a little. I think the people who stress over that cause more harm than good, and are the ones trying to do the bullying. The people that don't mind don't express that sentiment because then they just get attacked. So there was a little more going on here than just me getting mad, or whatever. I will never stoop to degarding someone for starting a thread. I just don't agree with that perspective on this. There is always gonna be "clutter" in the opinion of someone.
-
Re: Manu or S Jax, who would you rather have?
This thread is full of:jack.
/ thread