http://www.dailykostv.com/w/001989/
not sure how to embedd it
Printable View
http://www.dailykostv.com/w/001989/
not sure how to embedd it
Dude's lost his mind. He sounds a bit like a nutty Havard professor.
Was Michael Myers next to him?
yeah, beck was pretty bold to speak his mind. probably very few people on air that can do that, but he lays it out pretty good.
Yeah he laid it out pretty good.
Beck: "[Obama] has a deep seated hatred for white people"
Beck, seconds later: "I'm not saying that he doesn't like white people"
judging from that exchange, I don't see the inconsistency.Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
Beck is good at throwing out something inflammatory and then immediately saying "I don't know" and backpedaling a bit.
he's infamous for out-right lying too...
I wouldn't say he's "good" at it, I'd just say he "frequents" this strategy and while doing so, hurts the Conservative cause much more then helping it.Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
He's an entertainer. It's his job to say stupid shit and piss people off. Beck, O'Reilly, Rush, and Olberman are the news equivalents of Andy Kaufman.
...true, but a lot of people take them seriously...Olberman can get crazy, probably from his ESPN days, but he packs more truth into one show than all the wing-nuts on WOAI combined can fit in a day...
For me, it's his really bad attempts at comedy and annoying voices that make me dislike him more than any ideological differences.
It's like he's trying to be the conservative equivalent of the Colbert Report and it falls flat.
I like it when he cries though.
fucken cry baby..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nbadan
"You sir, are a fascist!"
^like that kind of truth?
BTW, what's with Olberman's homoerotic obsession with Bill O'Reilly?
hush the both of you... he just loves his country... and he's scared for it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarrinS
Quote:
Originally Posted by baseline bum
I like that he doesn't immediately back off from such statements like Beck does.Quote:
Originally Posted by DarrinS
Neither of them are gay. I would say they are obsessed with each other at this point, but no homo.Quote:
BTW, what's with Olberman's homoerotic obsession with Bill O'Reilly?
that stuff works on the radio because its just one guy in a room who has to fill 3 hours of airtime with SOMETHING, but seeing it on TV just makes me cringe.
Meh, Olberdick is just as bad as his peers on the other side of the aisle. A pox on both their houses.
The fact that Nbadan thinks Keith Olberman speaks more truth than conservative talk radio tells you all you need to know about him... Nbadan is certifiably nuts.
What did he say after the ended the video? I mean the segment wasn't over, did he explain what he was trying to say...albeit with a poor choice of words
He should have calibrated them better.
Beck is goofy and not too bright. Rush is the leader of that gang, and no matter if you like him or not, he's a smart cat.Quote:
Originally Posted by Viva Las Espuelas
Glenn Beck needs to lay off the benadryl. His comment about Obama hating white people was an epic fail. Obama's mom was white and his grandparents that helped him raised were white too. I'm pretty sure Obama doesn't hate white people. I do think that Obama panders a lot when it comes to black crowds and white crowds. When he's around black people, he acts like he's a brother from south central LA and when he's around white people, he acts like he's a yuppie from suburbia.
Did you guys post the vid on here of him in full blown 1830's german school boy uniform?
I don't know wtf it was, but it was embarrassing.
More scare-mongering LIES from GB:
Glenn Beck thinks ‘cash for clunkers’ site takes over your computer
By David Edwards and Daniel Tencer
Published: August 2, 2009
TV host Glenn Beck has a theory about the real reason the US government launched the “cash-for-clunkers” program: It’s a secret conspiracy to take control of your computer.
At the heart of Beck’s theory is the Cars.gov website, where the public can find information about the wildly popular cash-for-clunkers program. On his Fox show Friday, Beck displayed a “terms of use” warning, which he claimed was from the Cars.gov site, stating that anyone accessing the site would be effectively making their computer a part of the US government computer network — and the US government therefore has lawful access to all the files on that computer.
There’s only one problem with Beck’s theory. According to Jed Lewinson at the Daily Kos, the privacy statement is not from Cars.gov at all, but from the Esc.gov website, where car dealers log in to log transactions.
But that factual problem did not discourage Beck and his co-hosts.
“Here you are, trying to be a good citizen … and guess what, they are jumping right inside you [sic], seizing all of your personal and private information, and it’s absolutely legal, Glenn. They can do it,” said Fox’s Kimberly Guilfoyle.
Added Guilfoyle: “They can continue to track you, basically forever, once they’ve tapped into your system … it’s so broad that they can do just about anything.”
Beck concluded: “I know who our czars are now, and this collection of these czars, these are evil people. These are wicked, crazy, frightening people.”
=======
Continuing the traditional conservative/Repug "principle" of lying into alternative reality.
:lol glen
Hmmm. Ok. I'll bite. Define "anyone" then. If this read "it is completely false" then I'd be shame on beck. This just states that the terms were from another site the dealers access. We splittin' hairs here?
:lol Just went to cars.gov and I clicked every link. There is no privacy notice anywhere. There is one link for signing up to receive updates; all that asks for is an email address.
The clause actually exists, but only when a dealer actually logs in to conduct a transaction within the CARS system. It's basically a "don't even try to defraud us" warning.
Here it is. Click it yourself.
If you dare.
https://supplierpayments.esc.gov/OA_...gsk17LptZc1LOg
"This application provides access to the DoT CARS system. When logged on to the CARS system, your computer is considered a Federal computer system and is the property of the United States Government. It is for authorized use only. Users (authorized or unauthorized) have no explicit or implicit expectation of privacy.
Any or all uses of this system and all files on this system may be intercepted, monitored, recorded, copied, audited, inspected, and disclosed to authorized CARS, DoT, and law enforcement personnel, as well as authorized officials of other agencies, both domestic and foreign. By using this system, the user consents to such interception, monitoring, recording, copying, auditing, inspection, and disclosure at the discretion CARS or the DoT personnel.
Unauthorized or improper use of this system may result in administrative disciplinary action and civil and criminal penalties."
"of this system", lawyers can't write for shit. "this" has an ambiguous antecedent.
"this system" is CARS (my interpretation) or the dealers' computers (Beck's paranoid/hate-government/inflammatory interpretation)?
Given the trustworthiness and honesty of car dealers, combined with severe financial stress they are in, scaring the fraudulent shit out of them is sensible.
Wtf do conservatives care about this? I mean, the government can already sniff information packets through the internet with FISA/Patriot Act now. Not a huge difference.
I don't get people like Beck or Olberman, Maher or Rush, sometimes they have good points (except Olberman, that dude is a boob lets replace Meadows for Olberman) but they just go way over the top. I love me some Maher. He was one of the reasons I voted democrat back in 2006 among many others. But he gets stupid when he says something like America is stupid. He loses credibility. I give Maher some credit, he does rip the Prez from time to time. Rush makes some good points as well but then he goes off like ass and loses credibility.
I wish they would all stop making up shit and stop being so freaken emotional about every freaken topic and most important, don't always take there partys side. I mean fuck it gets so old. This Crowley-Gates thing was made political. Chances are if you choose Crowley you are a republican, if you choose Gates you are a democrat. Pretty sad. Maher says and he is right that if you are a racist you probably are a republican. I get that. I am no way even close to saying ALL republicans are racist but chances are if you are a racist you are a republican and not a democrat. I think it is fair to say if you are a minority you are a democrat. 95 % of balck people voted for Obama. That still floors me. Please no smartass remarks that 100 percent of whites voted for a white dude in the 2004 election. Stupid.This all may change over the next 3 years but that is how it is now.
These Becks and Meadows of the world need to quit cheerleading for one party and start talking policies. It is hurting America.
Who is Meadows?
Maddow....MSNBCQuote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
Ah. Every once in awhile I see some of her show. She tends to criticize Obama for not being left enough on gay rights (surprise!) and for continuing several of Bush's policies.
"America is stupid"
correct! Let me count the ways ...
^^^God you're a douche.
And God you're banned. About fucking time.Quote:
Originally Posted by johnsmith
I thought bans came with pink?Quote:
Originally Posted by CubanMustGo
At least I still have jack for homophobic slurs. :)
You didn't get the memo? I'm done. I stopped yesterday sometime. It's hard but I know I can do it!Quote:
Originally Posted by LnGrrrR
Pink is a semi-ban. You can't create threads, you're limited to replies in a thread (I think), but you can still get on. Banned means no posting privs whatsoever.Quote:
Originally Posted by LnGrrrR
Congratulations jack!Quote:
Originally Posted by jack sommerset
On an honest note, you'll be taken much more seriously if you stick to it, I believe.
Gotcha gotcha. Thanks for the info!Quote:
Originally Posted by CubanMustGo
His interview with GQ was pretty eye-opening. That man has no shame.Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
Everybody has a schtick. With Rachel, her thing is gay rights, Laura Ingraham's big thing is abortion, Beck specializes in scaring the shit outta simpletons, Hannity/Olbermann/Rush are general purpose schills and only go off script if they feel the script isn't conservative/liberal enough, O'Reilly just wants things to be the same as when he was a kid, and somebody like a Medved or Prager are decent religious minds.
I didn't know he did one. I googled real quick and saw this:Quote:
Originally Posted by __JaG__
http://stylemens.typepad.com/.a/6a00...11b878c970b-pi
I actually winced when i saw it.
My favorite thing about Olbermann is when he does the worst person in the world. It's usually either Bill O'Reilly, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, or someone that works for FOX News or is a Republican and/or conservative. I also think his obsession with Bill O'Reilly is hilarious.
Yeah, I don't know where the hell he got the courage to put the liederhosen on, but he looked fairly ridiculous...:lolQuote:
Originally Posted by SonOfAGun
I don't think we've met, I'm Johnsmith, and you are?Quote:
Originally Posted by CubanMustGo
beck-the mass man's hero and proof that ortega y gasset was correct in his assertion about the masses.
LOL Fox
I am always amazed how easily republicans follow human beings whose features resemble that of a pig. Look at his piggie cheeks, his piggie nose, his piggie ears, his piggie chin, his piggie eyes, and his piggie neck. Now that's a fat version of Alex Jones that I'll support!
I heard this doucher's book was on the top of the best seller list for a while, maybe still is. That makes me want to start writing total crap to pacify these wrinkly, old, stupid baby boomers who just need their conservative weenie to be stimulated, it really does seem like the easiest money in america next to getting signed as a christian rock band.
Those old fucks will spend their money on anything that talks shit about dimm o craps and obama the socialist. It's a gold mine. In that regard, Beck is a genius. He's probably rich as hell off this nonsense.
Do you expect liberals to complain about their Messiah doing it? Come on now. they trust the new government.Quote:
Originally Posted by Viva Las Espuelas
Ok lets do the math.
Obama likes to look at girls ass's, he wants to jack with health care,and he doesn't like white people.
Who wants to post Bush's faults?
new government? what new government? seems like the same old washington DC to me.
Of course these talk radio folks tell their followers to go to these meetings and let them know how you feel..they self promote eachother's books and bash liberals.. there is a lot of money these days catering the dummies, I mean conservatives, when writing liberal bash books.. how many has dick morris written in the last year? 2 or 3?Quote:
Originally Posted by Cant_Be_Faded
Quote:
Originally Posted by Viva Las Espuelas
Now you guys are afraid of the Patriot Act?Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
How predictable.
The point is generally "Let's move on, he is no longer president."Quote:
Originally Posted by french bread
Who said that? Simply pointing out the hypocrisy of the left! Besides, why is it important to do this?Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
he's testing out his new "?" button he got.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
LOL FOx
That's what the judge said made all of it legal.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
To do what? Possibly monitor computers that are logged into the US DoT? Gee, I can't think of any. :rolleyesQuote:
Simply pointing out the hypocrisy of the left! Besides, why is it important to do this?
Conversely, who is forcing anyone to login from a computer with incriminating evidence of anything on it?
if the left said half the shit that Glenn Beck did when Bush was in office the Republicans would be all over it, calling them unpatriotic. Republicans need to stand up to the douchebags (Beck, Limbaugh, Hannity, etc) and take back their party. Or else the moderate Republicans need to leave and form their own party. The moderate Republicans seem scared - scared that they don't have the numbers to compete - but I think they are wrong.
"Republicans need ... Beck, Limbaugh, Hannity, etc"
... to inflame, propel the Repugs' White Southern Racist Strategy.
The far-left that supported Obama (kos, atrios etc) are mostly upset with him for walking back civil liberty violations. Blue Dogs don't care. I don't see much hypocrisy there.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
Now I agree that Beck is out there at times. You have to understand Limbaugh and Hannity to know when they are serious, or exaggerating.Quote:
Originally Posted by Supergirl
Now I don't necessarily agree moderate republicans need to leave, but the liberal ones do!
If you go by what the naming of the parties mean, shouldn't we all prefer republican, or belief in the republic? Democrats believe in the one-size-fits-all rather than states rights.
Not much in a name anymore though. The republicans have become democrats, and the democrats have become split between socialists and communists.
Then why is it the news I hear that it's the Blue Dogs the democrats are having a hard time keeping on the leash?Quote:
Originally Posted by LnGrrrR
I think board liberal is just mad beck/rush/etc can get the average man's money before the snakes can stea...err...tax it.
u mad?
Their business plan > 100x more honorable than anything government can think up to get in the masses pocket.