Agree for ths spot minutes Beno played, he was effective.Quote:
Originally Posted by pawe
We have too many failed experiments with veteran guards like Vaughn, van Exel and Stoudamire. All they did was throw bricks come playoff time.
Printable View
Agree for ths spot minutes Beno played, he was effective.Quote:
Originally Posted by pawe
We have too many failed experiments with veteran guards like Vaughn, van Exel and Stoudamire. All they did was throw bricks come playoff time.
Antonio Daniels, at this stage in his career, is certainly better than Hill, but he is 34 years old, and is expected to play only in a backup role. Not sure if most people would think of him as a long term starter on the team.Quote:
Originally Posted by SpurNation
The Lakers don't even have a PG good enough to start for most team, and is by far their worst position and biggest hole.
As for the Mavs, Terry is more a SG than a PG, and Jose Juan Barea, while good vs. the Spurs, makes tonnes of mistakes and is an average point when not playing the Spurs.
Besides, there really isn't any point in going even more over the tax if Parker gets hurt. The Spurs will have no chance of winning a title if that happens, and teams don't go $10+ million in taxes with the prospects of not even making the Finals (unless you are the Knicks).
say what????Quote:
Originally Posted by pawe
that lazy piece of shit????
I can see a pretty good chance that AD get's a buy out this season and then would be available for the min. he didn't play much last season and now that the Hornets added Collison and Thornton this won't change.
if he agrees to a buy out, that is his contract minus the vet. minimum, the Hornets will save twice the money (even more if this move get's them under the threshold), meanwhile AD wouldn't lose money (I assume he will get a vet. min. contract), plus he can chose the new team, plus he can chose a situation where he get's more minutes.
however, this team likely won't be the Spurs, I can't remember that there was much love left when he left.
this aside, IF he would sign for the vet. min, I'm all for it. AD still can't shoot, but he's a capable playmaker, rarely turns it over and is still a decent defender. would be a huge upgrade over JV from last season.
And now Beno's new team is looking to give him away as well................Quote:
Originally Posted by pawe
If Parker gets hurt in the regular season Hill is a good enough fill in. If Parker gets hurt in the playoffs then it doesn't matter who the backup is.Quote:
Originally Posted by SpurNation
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpurNation
Darren Collison? I'm not sure that the Hornets would be okay with handing the reigns of their offense over to a pure rookie drafted 21st this year. He was good in SL, but then again, so was George Hill. I see a disparity.
Funny, seems like a lot of these same knocks were thrown at Parker early in his career. That didn't turn out too terribly.Quote:
Originally Posted by xtremesteven33
Hell, Parker couldn't even shoot for his first five years.
I'd be surprised if Hill ever becomes a TRUE point guard, but I think he can fit the same Scoring One mentality that Parker thrives on. And as he spends more time in the league and hopefully focuses his attention on certain areas, then he's bound to become more affluent to the game and be a better playmaker.
Keep in mind that this guy's got one rookie season under his belt, and he was being dangled on the playing time string for half of that. It's way to early to call it yet.
Fisher, Farmar and Brown can all handle the ball. Yes, it might be their weakest link, but these guys are more than capable in protecting the ball. Furthermore, the Lakers offense revolves around Bryant who is their primary playmaker.Quote:
The Lakers don't even have a PG good enough to start for most team, and is by far their worst position and biggest hole.
As for the Mavs, Terry is more a SG than a PG, and Jose Juan Barea, while good vs. the Spurs, makes tonnes of mistakes and is an average point when not playing the Spurs.
Barea was pretty good handling the ball against the Spurs. He went everywhere he wanted and was definitely tiring out Parker.
Now, let's go back to Hill. He just doesn't handle the ball well enough. Fisher, Farmer, Brown, Barea all handle the ball better than Hill. That's a plain and simple fact. Now even be as good a handler as Fisher or Brown (the two worst handlers), then he's worth his weight in gold.
Hill will spend a lot of minutes alongside Manu in the back court and then I'm not afraid about ball handling and play making. I wouldn't be surprised, if Pop tries to play Manu at the point some minutes. in fact I'm pretty curious, how this could work, IMO it should work out fine.
If we are simple talking about a good ball handler, then Ginobili is good enough. Even Jacque Vaughn, for all his flaws, was a pretty good ball handler.
But I am reading this as saying whether Hill was a good enough backup when compared to Barrea, Fisher and Brown. I am saying that Hill is at least at around the same level as those players with the exception of Fisher.
The problem with that logic, is that while Daniels has proven himself a capable backup in the this league, Hill appears to be a younger version of Daniels down to the size and length.Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainballer
I would take Hill over any of the backup PGs that have been mentioned in this thread, not much to think about IMO..none of them that have been mentioned are good playmakers, which is Hill's flaw right now..his ball-handling needs work, but he makes up for it with his explosiveness, athleticism, and length..
Farmar is one of the worst defensive players in the NBA..Fisher has no playmaking ability at all, and doesn't play consistent defense..Shannon Brown might be better than Hill, but Hill clearly has the better tools IMO, and he should be better this season..Brown also isn't a good playmaker..
Antonio Daniels isn't better than Hill at this point, Daniels doesn't have much left in the tank..
LOL @ Barea..George shut him down almost every time he guarded him this season..
Hill is never going to be a pure PG, and he won't even be asked to be a pure PG in our system..he'll be asked to create plays off penetration occasionally, but his main role is gonna be as a slashing/scoring PG, and also playing off the ball..
Manu is going to be our main ball-handler off the bench, and that's how it should be..
Hill clearly has talent and the physical tools to be a good player..he was only a rookie last year..I knew we aren't used to having players with upside, but we actually do right now..
If Hill can become as good as Rajon Rondo then all this investment will be worth it.
Rondo isn't a top class ball handler but he makes up for it by having a top class defense and more than adequate offense.
Like every has been saying, all Hill has to do is become a decent ball handler and he'll be golden.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pawe
what ? i thought Beno failed in SA because Pop can't coach backup PG.Quote:
Originally Posted by coyotes_geek