Rights to Tiago Splitter could be included. They have Biedrins and Randolph, Wright and Turiaf. Bonner would actually give them back their Troy Murphy type player.
Printable View
Rights to Tiago Splitter could be included. They have Biedrins and Randolph, Wright and Turiaf. Bonner would actually give them back their Troy Murphy type player.
Which is why a 3rd team needs to be involved to absorb a larger contract, or a team with a TPE like the Nuggets.Quote:
Originally Posted by DeJuanitoBlair
But to say Manu is the only way is just Ducks being a quack.
why insurance incase manu is not healthyQuote:
Originally Posted by DPG21920
right now manu's trade value is not all that either
???Quote:
Originally Posted by exstatic
as for the actual trade..I've said I'm against it in the past, and my opinion hasn't really changed..the only way I take Jackson is if he's willing to come off the bench in a Manu role, so we'll see how that would play out..that would allow Manu to start, and it would allow Pop to rest him throughout the season..
we would also be the deepest team in the NBA..
starting Jackson wouldn't work though IMO, so he would need to accept that role..
do you thinkQuote:
Originally Posted by DPG21920
rj,mason,tp,duncan,hill, manu and jackson
would get enough touches
spurs would be overcrowed if they did not trade on of those players for him
Nope. Spurs could just do Mason and Bonner + rights to someone. Or if you were dead set on Finley+Bonner, you could just throw in Marcus Williams.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chieflion
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMa...tradeId=mvdmd6
Manu is one of those guys who is more valuable to the Spurs than the rest of the other teams who will probably treat him like just another expiring. No way the Spurs trade him.
Ya they've been mentioning it a lot here(I'm in NY)..I think he was just saying that because of Al Harrington though..he said he wanted to win another title, and he obviously must know he won't win shit in NY..Quote:
Originally Posted by DeJuanitoBlair
mason is clutcher then sj
Jackson would get all of Mason's touches. If he wants out and wants to be a part of a winner, he has to make sacrifices.Quote:
Originally Posted by ducks
He did not say he wanted out of GS because he did not get enough touches.
This is what I would do but GSW would just counter with a " You take Maggette."Quote:
Originally Posted by DPG21920
If i am not wrong, Finley's + Mason's contracts are = to Jax's contract right?
If we trade Mason, we get Jax, who can run facilitate the offence and start in place of Mason. AND we will get Finley off our butts and thus able to sign a third string point guard to back up Hill if he bursts. See, its win win.
so where is mason going?Quote:
Originally Posted by DPG21920
Playoffs Ducks. Playoffs.Quote:
Originally Posted by ducks
He would be traded Ducks. Mason + Bonner for Jackson works.Quote:
Originally Posted by ducks
why would gs want mason when they could have manu?Quote:
Originally Posted by Sotongball21
it works for you but not gs:lol:lol:lolQuote:
Originally Posted by DPG21920
It is still more upside+expiring contract than I can think of than another team would offer for a guy who comes out publicly that he wants to be traded.Quote:
Originally Posted by ducks
GS is going to get low balled.
do you think anyone would want BOONER?
If its any team in Texas, Its going to be Houston. I'd love him back on the Spurs but I have a feeling Pop wouldn't.