Jax wants out..

I mean why not just offer finley and booner

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HarlemHeat37

???




as for the actual trade..I've said I'm against it in the past, and my opinion hasn't really changed..the only way I take Jackson is if he's willing to come off the bench in a Manu role, so we'll see how that would play out..that would allow Manu to start, and it would allow Pop to rest him throughout the season..

we would also be the deepest team in the NBA..

starting Jackson wouldn't work though IMO, so he would need to accept that role..

---

I would start Finley and have Manu and Jax off of the bench.

yeah because jax would love not starting....................

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ducks

why would gs want mason when they could have manu?

---

Because Manu is a better player than Mason? And I am sure Manu will take less money next year since this is his contract year (IIRC). AND Manu can come off the bench with Jefferson to score heaps off the other team's 2nd string players.

should not spurs just bring back scola to ...................
oh wait he has not told houston to fuck off yet like sj did to gs
then spurs fans would want scola back

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sotongball21

Because Manu is a better player than Mason? And I am sure Manu will take less money next year since this is his contract year (IIRC). AND Manu can come off the bench with Jefferson to score heaps off the other team's 2nd string players.

---

manu is not a better player when he is on bench playing on facebook

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sotongball21

Because Manu is a better player than Mason? And I am sure Manu will take less money next year since this is his contract year (IIRC). AND Manu can come off the bench with Jefferson to score heaps off the other team's 2nd string players.

---

he might he did not care about money when he said fuck you spurs I am playing even though spurs said no contract extension talk if you go play

or you could say he is not intersted in playing the rest of his days here

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ducks

it works for you but not gs:lol:lol:lol

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ducks

do you think anyone would want BOONER?

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ducks

I mean why not just offer finley and booner

---

Once again Ducks, when a player comes out and demands to be traded, he puts his team in a terrible position. Especially when he is older and has a long contract.

So, please answer the question. Name a team that would offer good talent for Jackson? At least as good as Manu. I want names and salaries that match please.

GS could use a guy like Bonner. He is a decent defender, runs the floor well and is an excellent 3 point shooter. He would be their poor mans Troy Murphy whom they liked.

You could offer Finley, but that would mean you would have to add a 3rd player if Bonner was the other piece. And as I said before, Mason is more attractive to GS because of talent and age than Finley. He is not Manu, but is a good coup for Jackson. Not to mention he is expiring.

So please do not avoid this. Answer the question to back up your claims.

The only thing of interest to GS would be expiring contracts. Maybe Fin and Bonner (which I would doubt) But also could be current draft picks and future as well.

Jackson would be a great piece of the puzzle for 2 to 3 years to come. But likelyhood is highly improbable.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DPG21920

Once again Ducks, when a player comes out and demands to be traded, he puts his team in a terrible position. Especially when he is older and has a long contract.

So, please answer the question. Name a team that would offer good talent for Jackson? At least as good as Manu. I want names and salaries that match please.

GS could use a guy like Bonner. He is a decent defender, runs the floor well and is an excellent 3 point shooter. He would be their poor mans Troy Murphy whom they liked.

You could offer Finley, but that would mean you would have to add a 3rd player if Bonner was the other piece. And as I said before, Mason is more attractive to GS because of talent and age than Bonner. He is not Manu, but is a good coup for Jackson. Not to mention he is expiring.

So please do not avoid this. Answer the question to back up your claims.

---

suns might offer amare if they are afraid he will walk
and gs is intersted in amare

Keep in mind, I am not saying the Spurs want or could get Jackson, or that GS would be willing to trade him.

I am just saying that more than likely, they would not be able to get a guy like Manu for him.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ducks

suns might offer amare if they are afraid he will walk
and gs is intersted in amare

---

Why would you think this? Why would the Suns want Jackson over Amare? Not to mention you still would have about 9M in salaries to match from GS, who?

because AMARE has said their is a 50-50 chance he will resign with suns

That makes no sense. They would rather let him walk and get cap space then trade for an aging player with a long contract.

dude this is the suns

You have lost.

Jackson wouldn't go anywhere if he was guaranteed to start, and Pop wouldn't guarantee starting to anybody coming in.

Jackson is a stupid head case, like his fight-friend Artest.

Dime: You made a big declaration earlier today by saying you wanted out of Golden State. When did you decide this?
Stephen Jackson: It’s not about a decision I made. It’s just things are in the air right now. I really can’t get too much into it right now, but I’m just looking to go somewhere where I can go and win a championship.

Dime: Are the Warriors aware of this?
SJ: Yeah they all know.

Dime: Is there anywhere specifically you want to go?
SJ: Either Cleveland, anywhere in Texas or out here with Al in New York.

http://dimemag.com/2009/08/breaking-...te/#more-18251

does sj think james is going to new york or something?

well we could always trade richard jefferson for him :lol

Bring Jax back

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DeJuanitoBlair

This is why I can't ever ever rate Pop higher than Phil. Phil would look at a chemistry issue as a challenge. Pop would rather not deal with it.

---

Understanding you have high intelect...go coach an NBA team and see if you can do better than what Pop has done with the Spurs.