Obama vs. Fox News

...but you do it for the amusement value...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by coyotes_geek

True, the Obama worshipers weren't watching Fox to begin with and the Fox watchers aren't going to quit watching just because Obama thinks they should.

---

RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it." Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)


Saul aulinsky's rules for radicals.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nbadan

...but you do it for the amusement value...

---

that....and i want to see what micca learned today.

so which is it? saul or al?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Nbadan

FAUX News is like a bloody train-wreck, everybody wants to see but then you really regret after...everybody knows what FAUX News is about, liberals laugh, moderates are dumbfounded and wing-nuts hear their 2010 battle-cry...

....if they could only vote for Glenn BecKKK and Limpbaugh it would be a match made in hell...but good luck trying to get GOP congressional approval ratings above their dismal levels of what? 30%... as long as talk-radio is in charge of the GOP....

---

Two liitle items.

ACORN and Van Jones. And more to come......dumbass, you haven't
changed a bit. Still a dumb Dimm-0-Crap.:toast:downspin:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Crookshanks

This is an excerpt from an article in the NYT from October 17th.

Even though almost all the critiques contained a kernel of truth, in each instance the folks who had the barrels of ink, and now pixels, seemed to come out ahead. So far, the only winner in this latest dispute seems to be Fox News. Ratings are up 20 percent this year, and the network basked for a week in the antagonism of a sitting president.

It could all be written off as a sideshow, but it may present a genuine problem for Mr. Obama, who took great pains during the campaign to depict himself as being above the fray of over-heated partisan squabbling. In his victory speech he promised, “I will listen to you, especially when we disagree.”

Or not. Under the direction of Ms. Dunn, the administration has begun to punch back. On Sept. 20, the president visited all the Sunday talk shows save Fox News’, with Ms. Dunn explaining that Fox was not a legitimate news organization, but a “wing of the Republican Party.”
============================

I've also heard this on various news reports in the last couple of days.

---

The only thing more believable than a NYTimes story is a NYTimes story with an unidentified source.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by clambake

so which is it? saul or al?

---

al I guess that's relevant to the WH thug like tactics with a free press.Or will ron emmanuele now dictate to us what we will and won't be allowed to listen to....for our own good of course ,I mean in the intrest of democracy.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hope4dopes

al I guess that's relevant to the WH thug like tactics with a free press.

---

how. explain.

Quote:

---

Or will ron emmanuele now dictate to us what we will and won't be allowed to listen to....for our own good of course ,I mean in the intrest of democracy.

---

what did he say to us?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hope4dopes

al I guess that's relevant to the WH thug like tactics with a free press.Or will ron emmanuele now dictate to us what we will and won't be allowed to listen to....for our own good of course ,I mean in the intrest of democracy.

---

When did Al Capone do that with the free press?

what about Dillinger?

If we are talking about the daytime actual newsgroup then I'll go Fox. The two girls on MSNBC and Sanchez on CNN are way more opinionated.

who was talkin about me?

AAAAH clambake and chimp, it's like a deranged pack of chiuahuahs nipping at your ankles.

Ahhhhh, micca. He always gets pissy when he can't explain himself.

i like fox news. its entertaining but not necessarily giving all sides of the story. i think the trouble is having commentators as journalists. smith is ok like bair they just deliver the news, smith just happens to have an amazing voice. somehow glenn becks dumbass is now an investigative reporter that exposes how art and sculptures are ways fascism exists or oligarhy.. hannity probably masturbating to reagans picture ...well you get the picture those guys are the trouble

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Crookshanks

I think Fox hopes Obama keeps it up - their ratings are up 20% since the Obama administration targeted them. :lmao

---

Really-what a petty and stupid thing to do. :lmao

Maddow/Olbermann Invited to White House Chat with Obama, But Fox Isn't a News Organization?

Quote:

---

Here's a curious turn in the White House vs. Fox News fight.

On Monday, MSNBC's Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow were among several people who attended an off-the-record briefing with Pres. Obama at the White House. Sources tell us other attendees at the two-and-a-half hour chat included Eugene Robinson of the Washington Post, Maureen Dowd of the New York Times, Gwen Ifill of PBS and Gloria Borger of CNN. Perhaps not surprisingly, no one from Fox News was in the room.

This fact quickly turned into ammunition for the folks at FOX. Last night on "Special Report," Bret Baier revealed the information pointing out that opinion hosts from one channel were being invited to a briefing with the Commander-in-Chief, all the while Fox was declared not a news organization.

And it continued on Fox & Friends this morning, as the troika talked about the back-and-forth ABC News White House correspondent Jake Tapper had with press secretary Robert Gibbs in the morning off-camera gaggle yesterday.

---

Who gives a shit.

^Is that you in your avatar.

Mullet man lives!


:lmao

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DarrinS

^Is that you in your avatar.

Mullet man lives!


:lmao

---

Bitch... I don't cut my bangs.

No seriously. Why should Obama invite anyone from Fox news to anything when they're obviously strongly against him?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Def Rowe

No seriously. Why should Obama invite anyone from Fox news to anything when they're obviously strongly against him?

---

Exactlly dude I mean what's the point of having a press if you can't control them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hope4dopes

Exactlly dude I mean what's the point of having a press if you can't control them.

---

did u complain when hush and hannity went to WH? You did't because you're a hypocrite..but you wear that proudly..:toast to a coward and a hypocrite

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by George Gervin's Afro

did u complain when hush and hannity went to WH? You did't because you're a hypocrite..but you wear that proudly..:toast to a coward and a hypocrite

---

Did you complain when Rush and Hannity went to the WH?