I'm sure Darrin was about to start this thread but... (Obama Poll Numbers)

Jesus fuck how can you not find it?

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/

On the left side of the page under Obama Approval Ratings on Oct 21.

mmmm. mmmm.mmmmm
barack hussein obama

mmmm. mmmm.mmmmm
You're an idiot.

Out of those who voted for McCain - Obama maintains 10% approval rating. Those who voted for him of course he still maintains a 6% disapproval rating. We should call those the Darrins, btw. Among those who voted for someone else or "don't remember" his approval rating is 32%.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MannyIsGod

Ruh roh....


October 24, 2009


Obama Has Won Over More Than He's Lost

Public Policy Polling notes President Obama's approval rating with people who didn't vote for him is 14% and his disapproval rating with people who voted for him is 6%.

"So he's won over twice as many people as he's lost since he got elected. Who in the national media is going to write that story? Not bad for someone whose support is supposedly falling apart."

---

Oh hell yeah manny,.... the people LOVE the LEADER that's why ron emmanuel, and obama are in smoke filled back rooms taking a rubber hose to congressional democrats to get on board and show a united front.
Yeah for some reason the DNC doesn't share your rosy outlook for the future....and it's only going to get worse for them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hope4dopes

Oh hell yeah manny,.... the people LOVE the LEADER that's why ron emmanuel, and obama are in smoke filled back rooms taking a rubber hose to congressional democrats to get on board and show a united front.
Yeah for some reason the DNC doesn't share your rosy outlook for the future....and it's only going to get worse for them.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Winehole23

micca goes straight to meltdown mode and free associates, almost 100% of the time.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MannyIsGod

Jesus fuck how can you not find it?

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/

On the left side of the page under Obama Approval Ratings on Oct 21.

---

OK, I was looking for a 10/24 poll, but 10/23 was the last date listed.

Still, the poll has 49% voting for Obama, 42% voting for McCain and 9% other. The poll didn't limit itself to those who actually voted. Only 33% of the registered voters voted for Obama.

19% <65?
That's not accurate. Especially when BHO is trying to take their healthcare. Thats the largest voting bloc in elections.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ignignokt

What the?

So the way the blog worded it was, Obama has a 14 percent approval rating amongst people who didn't vote for him, and 6 % amongst people who did?

SO that brings his net approval rating at 20%! lol.

Shitty poll.

---

Your lack of both reading comprehension and ability to think logically is painful to watch.

Please stop posting stupid things like this, my brain can't take the exposure to your brand of stupidity.

Quote:

---

PPP conducted a national survey of 766 registered voters from October 16th to 19th. The
survey’s margin of error is +/-3.5%. Other factors, such as refusal to be interviewed and
weighting, may introduce additional error that is more difficult to quantify.

---

How did it poll? If you look at the 2004 election map, by counties, Conservatives get their base from mostly small towns. Did they do a poll at a popular corner of a big city? Was it by phone?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wild Cobra

OK, I was looking for a 10/24 poll, but 10/23 was the last date listed.

Still, the poll has 49% voting for Obama, 42% voting for McCain and 9% other. The poll didn't limit itself to those who actually voted. Only 33% of the registered voters voted for Obama.

---

You seriously fail at looking at cross tabs. You continue down this path when I gave you the information you needed from the poll which was located in the cross tabs and you continue to use irrelevant information of how many registered voters voted for Obama.


Here, I'll hold your hand

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/p...ional_1021.pdf

Page 3. Top left corner.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by spursncowboys

How did it poll? If you look at the 2004 election map, by counties, Conservatives get their base from mostly small towns. Did they do a poll at a popular corner of a big city? Was it by phone?

---

:lmao

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RandomGuy

Your lack of both reading comprehension and ability to think logically is painful to watch.

Please stop posting stupid things like this, my brain can't take the exposure to your brand of stupidity.

---

He owned up to the self ownage which makes it fine imo. We're all allowed to make stupid mistakes.

Whats funny is when people don't own up to when its obvious like WC.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MannyIsGod

He owned up to the self ownage which makes it fine imo. We're all allowed to make stupid mistakes.

Whats funny is when people don't own up to when its obvious like WC.

---

He did indeed. Almost makes me feel bad for my post.

Almost.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MannyIsGod

:lmao

---

Why is that funny?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RandomGuy

He did indeed. Almost makes me feel bad for my post.

Almost.

---

Stupid mistake? By not seeing the poll until pointed out it was an earlier date than the article by 3 days?

Or do you mean by pointing out it didn't exclude those who didn't vote in the election? The PDF file has no question asking if they voted or not.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by spursncowboys

How did it poll? If you look at the 2004 election map, by counties, Conservatives get their base from mostly small towns. Did they do a poll at a popular corner of a big city? Was it by phone?

---

If you're really curious, you would have looked it up by now.

whine holes bitch

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hope4dopes

whine holes bitch

---

You certainly are.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wild Cobra

Stupid mistake? By not seeing the poll until pointed out it was an earlier date than the article by 3 days?

Or do you mean by pointing out it didn't exclude those who didn't vote in the election? The PDF file has no question asking if they voted or not.

---

Actually it does. Reading it hard. I fucking spoonfed you the info and you still can't get it. Not much else I can do. You can lead the clueless poster to the info but you can't make him drink.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

You certainly are.

---

jealous?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ignignokt

jealous?

---

There you go again.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MannyIsGod

Actually it does. Reading it hard. I fucking spoonfed you the info and you still can't get it. Not much else I can do. You can lead the clueless poster to the info but you can't make him drink.

---

Well then please point out the paragraph I missed. Polling registered voters is not the same as polling those who voted. When only 9% answered they voted for someone else, or didn't remember, I see the fallacy I pointed out earlier. Since 23% of the registered voters didn't vote, shouldn't question #5 reflect that? Please show me where they narrowed down registered voters to voters who actually voted. I must be stupid enough that I need my hand held.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wild Cobra

Well then please point out the paragraph I missed. Polling registered voters is not the same as polling those who voted. When only 9% answered they voted for someone else, or didn't remember, I see the fallacy I pointed out earlier. Since 23% of the registered voters didn't vote, shouldn't question #5 reflect that? Please show me where they narrowed down registered voters to voters who actually voted. I must be stupid enough that I need my hand held.

---

Ok. Then obviously the poll is completely fucked and has nothing of value to be seen because it doesn't meet WC's arbitrary benchmark that no one else cares about. PPP is an extremely reputable polling agency and they conduct accurate polls but you feel the need to pick apart this just the way you tried to do with party identification in the other thread (which you're absolutely wrong on also).

Its not even a big deal and all any of you have to say is "its one poll" because thats all it is but I find it absolutely telling how afraid you guys get and how quickly you rush to discredit it with bullshit. When your bullshit is refuted you move some goal posts and just keep the game going.

Its insanely amusing watching you scramble for anything that will make things fit your point of view instead of taking an objective look at the situation.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MannyIsGod

Ok. Then obviously the poll is completely fucked and has nothing of value to be seen because it doesn't meet WC's arbitrary benchmark that no one else cares about. PPP is an extremely reputable polling agency and they conduct accurate polls but you feel the need to pick apart this just the way you tried to do with party identification in the other thread (which you're absolutely wrong on also).

Its not even a big deal and all any of you have to say is "its one poll" because thats all it is but I find it absolutely telling how afraid you guys get and how quickly you rush to discredit it with bullshit. When your bullshit is refuted you move some goal posts and just keep the game going.

Its insanely amusing watching you scramble for anything that will make things fit your point of view instead of taking an objective look at the situation.

---

LOL...

I'm only pointing out the flaws, and you go apeshit...

My God man, get a grip!