fort hood

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

11-06-2009
Marcus Bryant

Re: fort hood

Quote:

Originally Posted by Winehole23

Never.

But we have to take the fight to the 'terrerists', no?
11-06-2009
MannyIsGod

Re: fort hood

Darrin, what I fail to understand is that if this information is so obvious and glaring then why can't you back it up?
11-06-2009
Ignignokt

Re: fort hood

Puerto Ricans... serious stuff.
11-06-2009
Ignignokt

Re: fort hood

Quote:

Originally Posted by MannyIsGod

Darrin, what I fail to understand is that if this information is so obvious and glaring then why can't you back it up?

It's because DarrinS has been completely pwned. Doesn't he remember the day Puerto Ricans flew the Marc Anthony tour jet into the Sears Tower on Nueve del Once?
11-06-2009
Winehole23

Re: fort hood

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarrinS

I can't tell you how many times I've heard about some crazy Buddhist yelling "Karma muthafuckas", before spraying bullets into a crowd.

You're as old as I am (if not older) -- can you name me some major Peurto Rican terrorist attacks?

<WH goes Googling>

The time some Puerto Rican radicals bombed the US House. Was it 1975? I didn't have to google that.
11-06-2009
whottt

Re: fort hood

Quote:

Originally Posted by rjv

where have you been? don't you know that the japs and chinese are all chinks and that mexicans and south americans are all meskins ?

And all Europeans and Americans are simply "white". What's your point?
11-06-2009
Ignignokt

Re: fort hood

Quote:

Originally Posted by Winehole23

The time some Puerto Rican radicals bombed the US House. Was it 1975? I didn't have to google that.

in a period from 1974-1980.. the FALN or FLAN!:lmao killed a total of 5 people.

How stupid can you be?
11-06-2009
Winehole23

Re: fort hood

I don't see anything stupid about it. Still less occasion for hilarity.
11-06-2009
Winehole23

Re: fort hood

At any rate, about 2/3 of terrorist incidents in the US are homegrown. That's neither funny nor insignificant IMO.
11-06-2009
DarrinS

Re: fort hood

Quote:

Originally Posted by MannyIsGod

Darrin, what I fail to understand is that if this information is so obvious and glaring then why can't you back it up?

I can't mathematically prove that followers of Islam have committed more acts of terrorism than, say, Buddhists, but it seems pretty obvious to me.

But, as WH has illustrated, we were bombarded by waves of Peurto Rican terrorists attacks in the 80's and 90's -- just none that anyone can remember.
11-06-2009
rjv

Re: fort hood

Quote:

Originally Posted by whottt

And all Europeans and Americans are simply "white". What's your point?

so you also call all euros and americans "white" ? i guess that would be your point. but if your sardonic hue is meant to imply a disgust with the ignorant classification of a diverse group into one generic set then i guess you should already understand the point.
11-06-2009
Winehole23

Re: fort hood

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarrinS

I can't mathematically prove that followers of Islam have committed more acts of terrorism than, say, Buddhists, but it seems pretty obvious to me.

Only if you ignore the universe of readily available information. It does not support your hypothesis that "one particular group" is disproportionately responsible for terrorism.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarrinS

But, as WH has illustrated, we were bombarded by waves of Peurto Rican terrorists attacks in the 80's and 90's -- just none that anyone can remember.

Yeah.

Bombing the US House of Representatives is no big deal to Darrin. Neither are FBI and CFR reports on terrorism that tend to refute what he says.
11-06-2009
DarrinS

Re: fort hood

Quote:

Originally Posted by Winehole23

Bombing the US House of Representatives is no big deal to Darrin.

It is a BIG deal, I just don't remember this incident.
11-06-2009
Winehole23

Re: fort hood

You seemed to be mocking it.
11-06-2009
Ignignokt

Re: fort hood

Quote:

Originally Posted by Winehole23

At any rate, about 2/3 of terrorist incidents in the US are homegrown. That's neither funny nor insignificant IMO.

Its funny that you try to equate Puerto rican terrorism with Islamic.
11-06-2009
Winehole23

Re: fort hood

...
11-06-2009
Winehole23

Re: fort hood

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ignignokt

Its funny that you try to equate Puerto rican terrorism with Islamic.

I did no such thing. The question I was responding to concerned terrorism in the US. I just wanted to show Darrin that's there's a melange of bad guys out there.
11-06-2009
Winehole23

Re: fort hood

Most of the ones who have attacked us were neither foreign, nor Islamic.
11-06-2009
PixelPusher

Re: fort hood

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ignignokt

Puerto Ricans... serious stuff.

Yeah, we weren't pussies about domestic terrorism back then.
11-06-2009
Ignignokt

Re: fort hood

Quote:

Originally Posted by Winehole23

I did no such thing. The question I was responding to concerned terrorism in the US. I just wanted to show Darrin that's there's a melange of bad guys out there.

So, does saying that Muslim fanatics who show signs of hostility and support for suicide bombings should be monitored equate to "Only Mulsims have committed "terrorist" attacks."

No one said that.

You keep looking more idiotic by every post to those who don't subscribe to PC.
11-06-2009
Ignignokt

Re: fort hood

Quote:

Originally Posted by PixelPusher

Yeah, we weren't pussies about domestic terrorism back then.

Snarky comments are the greatest tool against terrorism.
11-06-2009
PixelPusher

Re: fort hood

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ignignokt

Snarky comments are the greatest tool against terrorism.

You're right. If we don't take terrorism very, very seriously and give them all the attention they deserve, then the terrorists win.
11-06-2009
Winehole23

Re: fort hood

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ignignokt

So, does saying that Muslim fanatics who show signs of hostility and support for suicide bombings should be monitored equate to "Only Mulsims have committed "terrorist" attacks."

Darrin actually said we should divert all Muslims at airports.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ignignokt

No one said that.

Darrin said "one particular group" is disproportionately responsible for terrorism. He is wrong.
11-06-2009
Ignignokt

Re: fort hood

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarrinS

In my lifetime, no other particular group has carried out more attacks against the US.

Can you disprove that?

This is Darrin's original statement.

While Darrin is wrong on the quantity part. No doubt he meant to say more "devastating".

And he said, in broad terms.. against the US. Nowhere did he limit it to domestic terrorism.

Only a tool like Winehole, and MannyisGaping made the argument about just domestic "homegrown, naturally born" terrorism. Shoot what a deceptive way to skirt around 911.

Srsly.. that's as if Loss prevention for Sears looked at data concerning shrinkage and theft and found out that there was a higher rate of theft occured towards cosmetics and toys.. completely neglecting that Electronics although less occurring resulted in more loss.

So If these tools were in charge they would monitor revlon aisle just as much as the Plasma Tv section.

This is the kind of logic these guys use, and liberals use towards terrorism.

I'm glad the right party was in charge on 911.
11-06-2009
clambake

Re: fort hood

good point. how many sears stores have been attacked in foreign territory?

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page