How many Parker-Jefferson Alley opps do you think you'll see tonight?

Hopefully they're getting on the same page and we'll see some Parker -Jefferson fast break allys tonight

As far as I am concerned, 0 is probably the safest choice.

I don't think we will see any. Through these 19 games I have only seen 2 oop attempts to RJ. One successful and one not.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chieflion

As far as I am concerned, 0 is probably the safest choice.

---

if a future vBookie is : "who will be the first jerk to post in a TP related thread to bash him ?", you're my safe bet to make easy money.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kace

if a future vBookie is : "who will be the first jerk to post in a TP related thread to bash him ?", you're my safe bet to make easy money.

---

Whatever, I am not going to bash TP when he is playing well. Parker homers are just not worth talking to. You guys lose all your objectiveness. 1 alley oop in 19 games suggest that there is only about 10% chance there will be an alley-oop in a Spurs game. I am just going with the safe choice. Homers never learn. Everybody is saying it is a high chance it is 0. So, I am a Parker basher. Then you are just a sad Parker homer. Just calling it the way it is. I don't see why giving an unpopular opinion makes me a Parker basher.

Parker has never been a very good A.O. passer has he? Hopefully we'll see one again tonight though.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chieflion

Whatever, I am not going to bash TP when he is playing well. Parker homers are just not worth talking to. You guys lose all your objectiveness. 1 alley oop in 19 games suggest that there is only about 10% chance there will be an alley-oop in a Spurs game. I am just going with the safe choice. Homers never learn.

---

1 on 19 suggest less than 5%... :wakeup
how old are you? :lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pauleta14

1 on 19 suggest less than 5%... :wakeup
how old are you? :lol

---

Just giving the guy an update, in case Parker and Jefferson connect tonight. That makes 10%. If it is not, 1 on 19 is more than 5%. How old are you? Don't correct me if your Math suck as well. 2/20 is 10%. Just saying. It is highly unlikely there will be another connection but I was also hoping there would be. Parker homers......

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chieflion

Whatever, I am not going to bash TP when he is playing well. Parker homers are just not worth talking to. You guys lose all your objectiveness. 1 alley oop in 19 games suggest that there is only about 10% chance there will be an alley-oop in a Spurs game. I am just going with the safe choice. Homers never learn.

---

i don't give a fuck about TP's alley oop.

i just find it lame that you're always amongst the first ones to post in thread about him to bash him. get a life.

0

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kace

i don't give a fuck about TP's alley oop.

i just find it lame that you're always amongst the first ones to post in thread about him to bash him. get a life.

---

Again, if you disagree with my own personal opinion, that is fine, homer. Just don't call me a Parker basher. Do you even have conclusive evidence that I bash Parker for no reason at all? Homers these days..... You know what is the best part about it? The only people calling me out about this is just a bunch of Parker homers, like you. To add on, I was just answering the question made by the thread title? And it is a Parker hate post when statistically, it is about correct.

Parker is going to throw successful alley oops to RJ 10 times against the Bobcats. You happy now?

Everyone thinks it is 0, and you came here just to call me a Parker basher? Go get a life.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chieflion

As far as I am concerned, 0 is probably the safest choice.

---

:toast

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Texas_Ranger

0

---

Parker pass the ball! come on guys that was a one time deal, Parker doesnt pass the ball enough or well enough to think that we would see it happen again.

i say we might only see it a total of 5 times all season, from any player on the spurs roster.. You might get a chance to see it if you can make it to the Spurs practice facility.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bender

Parker has never been a very good A.O. passer has he? Hopefully we'll see one again tonight though.

---

He is not.
But when he is surrounded with some athletic players he can find them.
With the french team he likes throwing A.O. to the Pietrus/Turiaf/Batum...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mathbzh

He is not.
But when he is surrounded with some athletic players he can find them.
With the french team he likes throwing A.O. to the Pietrus/Turiaf/Batum...

---

I would love to have these guys on the Spurs. Pietrus is a nice player who plays both ends of the court, Turiaf provides some blocks and Batum plays some defense, although he is injured now.

Only stat that means anything to me is a win or loss...Spurs aren't really a flashy team..and we've won 4 rings that way...I'm ok with it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spursfan092120

Only stat that means anything to me is a win or loss...Spurs aren't really a flashy team..and we've won 4 rings that way...I'm ok with it.

---

Who is we? Are you on the team?

Oh and send me a picture of the rings you have won.

their are parker haters/homers here. the average spurs fan would be a parker homer. However the educated basketball fan would naturally be labeled a parker hater cause they will call him out for his lack of court vision. I'm labeled a Parker-hater cause i suggested we trade him or find other players that will play better with him. Most only look at the first suggestion and thus label me a TP-hater. However recently I been complimenting him cause he did a good job getting everyone involved. Then I am called a bandwagoner for complimenting him by the TP homers when he plays well. Here in spurstalk their are guys who look at both the pros and cons of a player. And the rest are just ignorant homers/haters. More homers than haters though.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by portnoy1

their are parker haters/homers here. the average spurs fan would be a parker homer. However the educated basketball fan would naturally be labeled a parker hater cause they will call him out for his lack of court vision. I'm labeled a Parker-hater cause i suggested we trade him or find other players that will play better with him. Most only look at the first suggestion and thus label me a TP-hater. However recently I been complimenting him cause he did a good job getting everyone involved. Then I am called a bandwagoner for complimenting him by the TP homers when he plays well. Here in spurstalk their are guys who look at both the pros and cons of a player. And the rest are just ignorant homers/haters. More homers than haters though.

---

I'm a Parker hater as well. We should go to a park and hold hands.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by portnoy1

their are parker haters/homers here. the average spurs fan would be a parker homer. However the educated basketball fan would naturally be labeled a parker hater cause they will call him out for his lack of court vision. I'm labeled a Parker-hater cause i suggested we trade him or find other players that will play better with him. Most only look at the first suggestion and thus label me a TP-hater. However recently I been complimenting him cause he did a good job getting everyone involved. Then I am called a bandwagoner for complimenting him by the TP homers when he plays well. Here in spurstalk their are guys who look at both the pros and cons of a player. And the rest are just ignorant homers/haters. More homers than haters though.

---

Don't bring logic into this. We are all Parker haters, so we are labelled bad fans by posters like kace.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chieflion

Don't bring logic into this. We are all Parker haters, so we are labelled bad fans by posters like kace.

---

ahhh, so what your saying is that if TP goes 0-10fg tonight with 2 ast and 7to's; and we say he didnt play well, then were Parker haters?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by portnoy1

ahhh, so what your saying is that if TP goes 0-10fg tonight with 2 ast and 7to's; and we say he didnt play well, then were Parker haters?

---

Yes we are.

this thread is just insane.

We're talking about how many alley oops a specific player, our PG, will throw to another specific one in a specific game.

logically, the answer is 0 or close to it, since there aren't too many alley oops in a game, especially between two specific players.

i only think about last years with CP3 to Chandler where you could bet safely that you will see several alley oops between two specific players.

and still, this incredibly stupid and meaningless stat is turned into a bashing way against TP, like "he will have 0 or maybe 1, as bad of a playmaker he is".

that's just laughable.

next thread: How many between-the-legs left-handed blind assist for a Haislip's buzzer beater game winner shot will TP have this game ?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chieflion

As far as I am concerned, 0 is probably the safest choice.

---

This.

Of course it would be nice to be proven wrong on this one. We freaking beat the Kings people that doesnt make a team an Elite all of a sudden. So awesome to get a win on them though.

The title of this thread should have been: "FAIL"!!!

1 per game...

As many as Parker sees and RJ is open for

I think we will see .0526 alley-oops tonight.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spursfan092120

Only stat that means anything to me is a win or loss...Spurs aren't really a flashy team..and we've won 4 rings that way...I'm ok with it.

---

The spurs need to add some flash to their game now. They have the players to do it this year. Pop needs to take the reigns off a bit on the structured offense.

OK here it is stat for thought...... Tony Parker in his career in the NBA playing along side TIM DUCNAN has thrown a total of 24 alley-opps to any player on spurs roster.. And i will include his stint as an all-star...... There are Pg's in the league that have thrown that many in 1 season to numerous players..... Just a side note here i do not ever question the players talent (meaning Tony Parker) just basketball decision making... I have always choosen pass-first pg's over shoot first mentality PG's... Parker is a good guard but needs to improve in acouple areas before i can call him a great point gaurd..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pauleta14

1 on 19 suggest less than 5%... :wakeup
how old are you? :lol

---

i was confused too.. haha

how many times will manu bounce the ball between another players legs tonight ?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chieflion

I would love to have these guys on the Spurs. Pietrus is a nice player who plays both ends of the court, Turiaf provides some blocks and Batum plays some defense, although he is injured now.

---

Pietrus and Batum would be great, not sure about ronny he is a good guy but I don't think he will ever understand the pop playbook.

I like hill a lot but portland screwed us badly on batum. He is going to be a very good bb player. I think he has more upside than hill.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DaBears

OK here it is stat for thought...... Tony Parker in his career in the NBA playing along side TIM DUCNAN has thrown a total of 24 alley-opps to any player on spurs roster.. And i will include his stint as an all-star...... There are Pg's in the league that have thrown that many in 1 season to numerous players..... Just a side note here i do not ever question the players talent (meaning Tony Parker) just basketball decision making... I have always choosen pass-first pg's over shoot first mentality PG's... Parker is a good guard but needs to improve in acouple areas before i can call him a great point gaurd..

---

go root for the suns or something

Guy last game was the first time Parker and Jefferson both had good games together. And we saw the first Parker to Jefferson Ally of the season. If now these games are agienst bad teams don't you think the chemistry should continue to build and you see at least 2 allys tonight

How about how many times Parker forces his dribble into the lane causing a turnover while Jefferson is wide open on the three point line?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dr. Gonzo

Who is we? Are you on the team?

Oh and send me a picture of the rings you have won.

---

AFAIK, as long as you support the Spurs YOU are part of the team.
ask David Robinson.:flag:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rascal

The spurs need to add some flash to their game now. They have the players to do it this year. Pop needs to take the reigns off a bit on the structured offense.

---

If flash gave you extra points, I'd be down for it, but a wide open layup scores as many points as a dunk, and I'm ok with that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rascal

The spurs need to add some flash to their game now. They have the players to do it this year. Pop needs to take the reigns off a bit on the structured offense.

---

I guess it is possible one could have missed all the articles/discussion about Pop and his staff tearing huge swaths of pages from the playbook.

I don't care much about alley-oops. I am just happy that Parker is setting his new goal to be a great passing PG. If it is really true that Pop has said it before that TP is a very competitive person, and I believe he will finally successfully reach his goal. When that happens, TP is going to be a very dangerous PG in the league. Hopefully, till then, he will still stay with the Spurs. Just a thought.