-
Re: McChrystal Is Summoned to Washington Over Remarks
not important to read all of that.
clinton had it right when he kept saddam in a box.
the rest were swayed by "deliberately misleading evidence" provided by bush.
-
Re: McChrystal Is Summoned to Washington Over Remarks
I'm not sure if I heard the radio blurb correctly on my way home this morning from work.
Petreous taking his place?
Weren't the democrats calling him "betray-us?"
-
Re: McChrystal Is Summoned to Washington Over Remarks
-
Re: McChrystal Is Summoned to Washington Over Remarks
Quote:
Originally Posted by
z0sa
Perhaps that was the wrong wording; what I mean is, it's illogical to stay if the majority of Americans don't think it's necessary.
The majority of Americans are morons when it comes to knowing anything about the rest of the world, let alone the vastly complex problem that Afghanistan represents.
That is partly why Obama got some votes, because of his promises to end the war.
Lo' and behold Obama gets into the white house and gets some decent advice and briefings and then realizes that withdrawing is not really an option.
The next president will face the same problems and much of the same advice.
-
Re: McChrystal Is Summoned to Washington Over Remarks
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wild Cobra
I'm not sure if I heard the radio blurb correctly on my way home this morning from work.
Petreous taking his place?
Weren't the democrats calling him "betray-us?"
Some liberals were indeed saying that. They were/are idiots.
-
Re: McChrystal Is Summoned to Washington Over Remarks
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CosmicCowboy
Funny how Sadaam's carefully orchestrated fabric of lies he created to project him as a "major world power" ended up biting him in the ass.
Our intelligence community believed him.
Pretty much every intelligence community believed that, despite the lack of evidence.
It was an interesting bluff, and you are right that it bit him in the ass. That miscalculation cost him one non-streched neck. Good riddance.
-
Re: McChrystal Is Summoned to Washington Over Remarks
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CosmicCowboy
Sorry, I actually have a job and have not read the counterinsurgency manual cover to cover but understand the highlights.
Meanwhile, Are you fucking stupid? Do you not know how this mess started? The US armed and trained the fucking Taliban with the goal of defeating the evil USSR empire. Yeah, we knew they were religious fanatics but they were stone cold killers and thats what we needed, not a bunch of farmers. Well, when the USSR left Afghanistan we did too, and left the general population to the mercy of the Taliban instead of staying there and nation building while we had a chance. Thank you very much Bill Clinton. Now, we reap what we sowed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wiki
The final troop withdrawal started on May 15, 1988, and ended on February 15, 1989 under the last Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev.
Who was president on February 15, 1989?
I am not entirely sure why the governor of Arkansas was responsible for abandoning the Afghans.
-
Re: McChrystal Is Summoned to Washington Over Remarks
Quote:
Originally Posted by
RandomGuy
Pretty much every intelligence community believed that, despite the lack of evidence.
It was an interesting bluff, and you are right that it bit him in the ass. That miscalculation cost him one non-streched neck. Good riddance.
It is true that most world intelligence communities believed that Saddam had WMD's...but...
They did NOT believe that Saddam had any kind of positive relationship with Al Quaida, and THAT is what I could never forgive the Bush Administration for lying about. Cheny kept saying repeatedly on those Sunday morning talk shows that it was "clear" that they were connected to Al Quaida, and he knew all along that it was a lie, and his own intelligence agencies had assured him that Al Quaeda hated Saddam...and vice versa.
-
Re: McChrystal Is Summoned to Washington Over Remarks
Long after the invasion was underway, Cheney kept talking about how Al Quaeda was in Iraq.
Total unmitigated bullshit.
They DID come in after we tore up the country...
-
Re: McChrystal Is Summoned to Washington Over Remarks
Quote:
Originally Posted by
EVAY
Long after the invasion was underway, Cheney kept talking about how Al Quaeda was in Iraq.
Total unmitigated bullshit.
They DID come in after we tore up the country...
Indeed.
Much was made of a couple of low-level contacts between Iraqi intelligence and Al Qaeda, but no one familiar with the particulars would say it was anything more than the equivalent of two mail-room clerks from GM and Ford getting together for lunch.
-
Re: McChrystal Is Summoned to Washington Over Remarks
Quote:
Originally Posted by
RandomGuy
The majority of Americans are morons when it comes to knowing anything about the rest of the world, let alone the vastly complex problem that Afghanistan represents.
That is partly why Obama got some votes, because of his promises to end the war.
Lo' and behold Obama gets into the white house and gets some decent advice and briefings and then realizes that withdrawing is not really an option.
The next president will face the same problems and much of the same advice.
So our logic is: since we're there, let's finish the job. Let's not let our dead soldiers' lives be in vain since the country will once again fall into extremist hands and cause even more lives to be lost. And others.
What are some reasons why you think it will take as many as 40 years for the Afghans to become entirely autonomous?
-
Re: McChrystal Is Summoned to Washington Over Remarks
"let's finish the job"
US finished the job of chasing AQ out of Afghanistan and destroying the Taleban in 2002.
The generals say, like in Iraq, there is no military solution in Afghanistan. The backward, corrupt, tribal, shithole "country" is not worth dying for, now or ever.
The best defense of USA is here in the USA. Iraq and Afghanistan bullshit wars have not increased the US's security at all. A total waste lives and treasure (but the MIC and oilcos did well).
-
Re: McChrystal Is Summoned to Washington Over Remarks
Suddenly, MoveOn.org removed "Betray-Us" ad from their website.
http://dailycaller.com/2010/06/23/mc...rg-scrambling/
Quote:
Oddly enough, MoveOn.org still had this Sept. 2007 ad up as of June 18, according to their Google cache. But if you go to
http://pol.moveon.org/petraeus.html now, it’s gone. They kept it there for almost 3 years before taking it down all of a sudden.
Wonder why?
http://dailycaller.com/wp-content/up...alBetrayUs.jpg
-
Re: McChrystal Is Summoned to Washington Over Remarks
Quote:
Originally Posted by
z0sa
So our logic is: since we're there, let's finish the job. Let's not let our dead soldiers' lives be in vain since the country will once again fall into extremist hands and cause even more lives to be lost. And others.
What are some reasons why you think it will take as many as 40 years for the Afghans to become entirely autonomous?
Primary reason:
No infrastructure.
By any measure, human capital, physical capital, legal infrastructure, Afghanistan is roughly where the were pretty much at the level of the incas in the 1600's.
You just can't create a nation out of whole cloth in ten or even twenty years.
I would note the modern state of Germany didn't exist in 1860. It took more than a decade to form it, even with the forces of nationalism and common cultural elements to grease the wheels and force the two or three dozen principalities under one common flag.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wiki blurb on German unification
Unifying various states into one nation required more than some military victories, however much these might have boosted morale. It also required a rethinking of political, social and cultural behaviors, and the construction of new metaphors about "us" and "them." Who were the new members of this new nation? What did they stand for? How were they to be organized?
Similar problems existed and were encountered for just about every modern nation created by colonial fiat, as Afghanistan was.
I think one good example is how Africa has developed post-colonial period. Contrary to many people's beleifs it has made massive strides, given where it was in 1950-1960.
Another 10-30 years given how things seem to go for the development of nations, is not outside the realm of what is necessary, IMO.
-
Re: McChrystal Is Summoned to Washington Over Remarks
you shouldn't go to moveon.org.
i don't.
-
Re: McChrystal Is Summoned to Washington Over Remarks
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DarrinS
why are you so worried about how Obama's decision is impacting MoveOn?
-
Re: McChrystal Is Summoned to Washington Over Remarks
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CosmicCowboy
Your fucking President and Attorney Fucking General couldn't read a THIRTEEN PAGE Arizona law either.
Fuck you Manny.
He gave me the link and I will probably read the full text. as I said, I've read the highlights.
Your jealousy/penis envy when I post continues to crack me up.
Fucking Loser. Bite Me.
Thanks for taking time away from your job to make this post.
-
Re: McChrystal Is Summoned to Washington Over Remarks
Quote:
Originally Posted by
MannyIsGod
Thanks for taking time away from your job to make this post.
Just wake up, bitch?
-
Re: McChrystal Is Summoned to Washington Over Remarks
You had to edit that?
:lmao
Shouldn't you be working?
-
Re: McChrystal Is Summoned to Washington Over Remarks
Quote:
Originally Posted by
MannyIsGod
You had to edit that?
:lmao
Shouldn't you be working?
I am working. I can multi-task.
-
Re: McChrystal Is Summoned to Washington Over Remarks
-
Re: McChrystal Is Summoned to Washington Over Remarks
Quote:
Originally Posted by
clambake
you shouldn't go to moveon.org.
i don't.
Why? are they too far to the right for you?
-
Re: McChrystal Is Summoned to Washington Over Remarks
COIN is has been a standoff at best, a war of slow attrition at worst, in Afghanistan. [over hasty inference, retracted, with apologizes to z0sa. -Ed.]
-
Re: McChrystal Is Summoned to Washington Over Remarks
^ You mean concerning McChrystal, or concerning McChrystal's tactics, or..?
Our quelling of these 'rebels' will never be complete (i think we agree there). Even in 40 years, I doubt the terrorist threat will be gone. It may even increase exponentially as more of the country's vast natural resources are uncovered and extracted.
-
Re: McChrystal Is Summoned to Washington Over Remarks
Perhaps I mistook you. You seemed to be emphasizing the importance of Karzai's approval, and alluded to a vague improvement in US-Afghan relations.