We were contenders then. We won't be in 2014. Different scenario should bring forth different results.Quote:
Originally Posted by ElNono
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_pzuufqtyQH...nley-spurs.jpg
One ring, appreciate. :hat
Printable View
We were contenders then. We won't be in 2014. Different scenario should bring forth different results.Quote:
Originally Posted by ElNono
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_pzuufqtyQH...nley-spurs.jpg
One ring, appreciate. :hat
Eat it uncooked.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackjack
http://www.bananablue.com.au/images/...25116143_1.jpg
No heat shield needed.
:lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Blackjack
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chieflion
Guinness . . . :tu
you cant switch out a player for defense and offense. you also need consistency in a lineup. You cant say, i will play hariston (good defender off chance of becoming an NBA starter) for defense, and then replace his offense with someone else... it doesnt work that way.Quote:
Originally Posted by DPG21920
And barnes, u know very well he has head case issues, and pop doesnt like him and barnes doesnt like us, there was a link here somewhere, where barnes did not pick the spurs as one of his destinations. :wakeup
Finley thread! :lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Chieflion
Nah. It is now a Mamee Monster Noodle Snack thread +Quote:
Originally Posted by ElNono
http://www.winstonspub.ca/_pictures/guinness.jpg
Ya, that's right. I wonder if I soak the noodles in them, how would it taste? But hey, never had a sip of beer in my entire life.
not to mention end of games u need familiarity u need someone atleast of jeffersons talent to play as a starter in this league. And if you have played basketball off the ball u know u need the ball consistenty to perform. last year with the injuries to tony parker they did not have enough time to mesh. And despite all teh problems, pop always looks for playing above themselves regardless of situation and jefferson did this in the PO. You know how bonner has NEVER played well in teh PO? despite all teh issues and all teh criticism , RJ balled for that pivotal game agains the mavs, he proved that he can play despite all the criticism.
You need players like that who step up, even if not always conistent. Like steve kerr breaking out with all the three pointers, like Stephen jackson burying all those threes against dallas. players who can rise above themselves for a game and swing a series without having anything special done for them. He proved he is atleast not a choker, and we need a starter for the next 2 years atleast and Rj is at the very least a proven starter in this league. And developing D leaguers can wait two years. we are not going to be a contenter once duncan declines cmiopletely anyway.
Are we derailing this thread?
Never mind, let us proceed. :hat
Are you talking about Richard Jefferson or Richardson, Jason? :lolQuote:
Originally Posted by anonoftheinternets
Guinness ain't for everyone, I've gotta be in the mood for it, and mixed with noodles probably ain't for everyone either (don't knock it until you try it -- although I'm not sure I was in the right condition to judge) but that's not what I meant or what it means.
Watch this.
I'm not really a fan of beer... I mostly drink soda but if it's alcohol my fave is definitely:
http://a3.vox.com/6a00cd971e81924cd5...deb3be2b-500pi
My fave is probably, yes. As in, 'Do you like this beer or liquor? What's your preference?'Quote:
Originally Posted by ElNono
'Yes.'
Big reason why I hardly drink anymore. :downspin:
Now that the trade deadline has come and gone and we've seen who was moved is there anyone that wishes we still had RJ's old contract to trade?
Could've moved him for Melo.
:stirpot:
Though I was against the initial trade for RJ, I was in agreement with the Spurs' rationale for bringing him back. And given what we've seen from RJ to this point, how he's become the catch-and-shoot player he needed to become to succeed on this team, I think the Spurs are looking pretty good from the short-term competitive standpoint.
Hard to imagine the Spurs could have brought anyone in with his expiring that would have been able to fit this team better at this late stage of the game. Maybe a better player in talent or skillset, but doubtful they would have seen their talents come to fruition in time to bolster their championship chances this year - not anymore than an ingrained and confident RJ, anyway . . .
Not really. Especially considering the hole at the SF position that trading away RJ would have created.Quote:
Originally Posted by MannyIsGod
I suppose benefactor does. We could've gotten Melo don't ya know. :lol :fightQuote:
Originally Posted by MannyIsGod
Are we assuming that an RJ on a 15M expiring contract plays as well as an RJ on a new 4 year deal? Are the Spurs still 47-10 in this scenario? If so, then there's no way the Spurs trade him at this point in such a successful season.Quote:
Originally Posted by MannyIsGod
Now in an alternate reality where the RJ on an expiring contract plays like the 2009-10 RJ and the Spurs are 33-24 and scuffling for a playoff spot without even one round of HCA, then yes. RJ could have been the key piece in a trade with Charlotte for Wallace and Nazr.
Of course if Lincoln didn't go to the theater that night...
RJ has been great. There would be no reason to move him. I guess the only drawback is that it gave the Spurs enough cap space to re-sign Bonner.
You can't just leave us hanging like that Obi! :downspin:Quote:
Originally Posted by Mel_13
Didn't seem like the right thread to discuss a more enlightened version of Reconstruction...Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackjack
:lol
This thread is fucking epic!