April fools?! I hope not...
Printable View
April fools?! I hope not...
Stephen should have won executive of the year. Great deal
The Cowboys created $12.8 million in cap space according to the Dallas Morning News. Romo's base for 2015 will be $1 million with the other $16 million moved into a signing bonus. The Cowboys had some free agents to officially sign, including Rolando McClain who just agreed to a deal; Romo's restructure will allow them to do that. They could also potentially go after some more bargain free agents (Anthony Spencer?) if they so choose.
http://www.bloggingtheboys.com/2015/4/1/8326769/dallas-cowboys-restructure-tony-romos-contract-free-up-cap-space
:lmao restructured after Murray leaves.Quote:
Originally Posted by manufan10
We signed Hardy, McClain, and McFadden for less than Murray. :lolQuote:
Originally Posted by djohn2oo8
Give me that shit every day of the week, tbh.
:lol Hardy is about to get suspended. And McFadden is injured more than Murray, not to mention he sucks. Cowboy fans were crying about not enough money yet Romo still restructures.Quote:
Originally Posted by SupremeGuy
we got hardy, mcclain, mcfadden with the money we saved from NOT signing murry. after the restructure, we have thirteen million to play with and sign AP with. executive of the year doing big thangs
http://i62.tinypic.com/dhcqon.gif
romo
AP
witten
dez
Oline
and the kraken causing havochttp://i62.tinypic.com/2ijn4e8.jpg
So you are in favor of paying running backs big money?Quote:
Originally Posted by Trill Clinton
will mcclay found another gem
for a rare talent like AP??? yupQuote:
Originally Posted by djohn2oo8
:lolHaters mad AF rnQuote:
Originally Posted by Trill Clinton
You're seriously trying to make fun of the Cowboys for not overpaying an overrated running back who's a product of the O-line? RB is the most replaceable position in the league for a reason.Quote:
Originally Posted by djohn2oo8
It's, at most, a 6 game suspension. It's not like he's going to be suspended for 12 games or season long suspension. That gives him 10 games to make an impact. I agree that Murray is a better back than McFadden, and I think the Cowboys will address the RB area via the draft. There are plenty of good backs in this draft. While others are on the Peterson bandwagon, I'm not sold on the Cowboys being players in acquiring his services.Quote:
Originally Posted by djohn2oo8
You can argue WR is just as replaceable. Also, Murray led the league in yards after contact so it wasn't all the line. Every good or great RB has a good or great line at some point. Doesn't take anything away from the RB. A RB who can pick up blitzes, break tackles, and catch out the backfield isn't really overrated. However, thats fine. It's the Cowboys saying how DeMarco is always hurt yet willing to pay Peterson big money being that he is older, and has 1100 more carries.Quote:
Originally Posted by Clipper Nation
I agree with this from Blogging the Boys:
http://www.bloggingtheboys.com/2015/...lain-efe-obadaQuote:
While the Cowboys have now answered all the immediate salary cap questions, one thing that the Romo restructure does not mean is that Dallas is looking to figure out a way to acquire Adrian Peterson. While the thought of a healthy and productive AD operating behind the Dallas offensive line is intoxicating, it is also extremely unrealistic. The costs are simply prohibitive. Even if you disregard the repeated assertions from the Minnesota Vikings that they have no intention of parting ways with Peterson, despite his apparent discontent, the team would almost certainly not simply cut him if they did give up on having him play. They would demand draft picks, which is not something that the current brain trust in Dallas would seem likely to go for. And Peterson has shown absolutely no willingness to take a lower deal than the $43 million that he is now scheduled to earn over the next three seasons. With the way Dallas has handled things financially so far, it is hard to imagine them committing those kinds of resources for a running back, not matter how superb he has been in the past. And despite his remarkable durability, Peterson is 30. Even he is going to lose a step at some point, and it would be a stupid bet that he would not do so on that kind of a contract.
i would agree but dudes 30Quote:
Originally Posted by Trill Clinton
like I said, AP is a rare talent and has fresher legs than any back from sitting out a year.Quote:
Originally Posted by spurraider21
Romo is old, witten is old and we are in win now mode. We get AP and the superbowl is ours to lose
Ftr, I know we won't get AP
I hope we do. Randle ain't gonna cut it.
I said in an earlier post that the only way I foresee the Cowboys signing Peterson is if he comes dirt cheap. I just don't see how/who they would trade to get him, and the Vikes have said they aren't going to cut him.
Why would we want to let one high priced RB go to sign another? Runners aren't worth big bucks anymore, sign em to 5 year deals as rookies and move on to the next after IMO. That 13 million is for draft picks and unsigned FA's.Quote:
Originally Posted by Trill Clinton
I'm lukewarm on AD. He's a beast, but like others have pointed out, he's 30, and we can spend the $13M on filling holes (especially on defense).
McFadden with a rookie (hopefully Gordon or Gurley) will be able to get it done, cheaply. We also need more rushmen, CB, and S (to hopefully start at FS, move Church to the bench, and Wilcox to SS).
There are many moves we need to make, Peterson is not necessarily one of them.
Good thing we don't have to pay Hardy for games he's suspended.Quote:
Originally Posted by djohn2oo8