Printable View
lulz, I'm not the genius that needed to put Progress in my party title to really get the point (deception) across :rollinQuote:
Originally Posted by clambake
Seriously though, progressives should just go circle jerk with the labour party across the pond to reach their utopia faster.
Oh, and 2 inches biatch!...........from the ground!
no doubt about that.Quote:
Originally Posted by EmptyMan
one track mindQuote:
Seriously though, progressives should just got circle jerk
dr. laura seems to be suffering for a number of things: chronic stupidity being the most serious one.Quote:
Originally Posted by DarrinS
The host is out to make a name for himself. He's been making youtube videos for years, can't really trust him in the anchor chair.
he's part of a program called 'young turks'. he can sometimes be a bit annoying but he's far more neutral than most of the network figures you'll see on a daily basis.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stringer_Bell
Is this the unbiased news that fox should be more like?
fox is critical only of the left, CNN tends to favor the left. unbiased would be a medium willing to be critical of both parties and ideologies.Quote:
Originally Posted by spursncowboys
this sort of political scrutiny is almost never seen in the news and certainly in none of the major news outlets.
At least Victoria Taft has four listeners!Quote:
Originally Posted by DarrinS
cnn, like most tv media, pushes social issues. social class inequalities, and anti-gun, etc. I think it is less about party. Well that is what I thought, until Journolist and I can only assume there are more like this that put dems in a good guy vs. bad view.Quote:
Originally Posted by rjv
When ever cnn or msnbc has a republican or conservative it is usually a moderate who is outnumbered. I never see flame throwing socialist liberals on fox, but they are always intelligent and able to debate the issues without focusing on lies and misrepresentation. Anyway I don't want to sit a defend a company that doesn't pay me to.
weird how the two guys who call themselves progressive -this guy and john stewart - are more neutral than most anchors.Quote:
Originally Posted by rjv
That's because they tend to actually hold Obama to, ya know, all the stuff he promised. And lots of hardcore lefties are pissed, due to backtracking on things like civil liberties, GTMO, repealing DADT, etc etc.Quote:
Originally Posted by spursncowboys
obama I thought said he never supported same sex marriage.
Damn, that's a tough call since he's a EuroAsian mutant but I'm going consider Turks to be caucasian and therefore by definition he is a racist.Quote:
Originally Posted by DarrinS
lemme get this straight. darrin "wonders" whether a liberal talk-show is a racist because he/she criticizes the president on a matter of policy yet this fucking moron has reservations about applying that same standard and term to a right-wing radio host who uses a derogatory word to describe african-americans eleven times in the span of 5 minutes?
that just tells me that darrin is a hack and unworthy of attention
Poor Prometheus Maximus. Hope that shortens to just Max.
The Turks are white men. Hah.Quote:
Originally Posted by SnakeBoy
Go tell it to the EU. :lol