Re: after Obama retires...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wild Cobra
I think that part needs to be changed. I think that some people of some religions should be banned. Anyone who follows a religion that dictates the imposition of that law on society should be banned from holding office.
We do it the right way though. By amendment, protests, increasing knowledge, etc. Not by breaking the law.
You do know that the First Amendment is there to protect unpopular speech, right?
And uhm... there's quite a few Christians out there that would be nabbed by this law.
Re: after Obama retires...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wild Cobra
Christianity does not impose itself over law, nor do most other faiths.
Why is it funny for me not to want a follower of Sharia law, or other authoritarian religion, not be able to serve?
Right.... so there wasn't any judge who tried to put the Ten Commandments in a courthouse, or any numerous amount of politicians who use God as a justification for policy, or use the Judeo-Christian values as a basis for morality... etc etc.
Re: after Obama retires...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
LnGrrrR
You do know that the First Amendment is there to protect unpopular speech, right?
And uhm... there's quite a few Christians out there that would be nabbed by this law.
How do you figure?
Does it meet this criteria:
Quote:
Anyone who follows a religion that dictates the imposition of that law on society should be banned from holding office.
Re: after Obama retires...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wild Cobra
How do you figure?
What exactly do you mean by "dictates that law" etc etc? After all, many religious folk use the Bible as justification for certain laws based off morality. Should they be unable to hold office?
What about people who are Muslims, but don't agree with enforcing their religion as law? Is that ok?
You make it sound like there's only one Islam. Islam believers have various beliefs/strengths of belief, as do Christians.
Re: after Obama retires...
Quote:
Originally Posted by LnGrrrR
What exactly do you mean by "dictates that law" etc etc? After all, many religious folk use the Bible as justification for certain laws based off morality. Should they be unable to hold office?
Personal justification is not the same as having to follow a strict law of your religion. In fact, somplace in the Bible, it says God's followers are to be law abiding. God's law if for the people. Not for the government.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LnGrrrR
What about people who are Muslims, but don't agree with enforcing their religion as law? Is that ok?
So they are false followers? Wouldn't their own disown them?
Quote:
Originally Posted by LnGrrrR
You make it sound like there's only one Islam. Islam believers have various beliefs/strengths of belief, as do Christians.
Yes, there are different sects. I'm not ruling all Islams out by my statement. Only those who are in a sect that requires strict laws of the religion that are imposed over others.
Re: after Obama retires...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wild Cobra
Personal justification is not the same as having to follow a strict law of your religion. In fact, somplace in the Bible, it says God's followers are to be law abiding. God's law if for the people. Not for the government.
someplace in the Bible it says says a woman must not teach, remain silent and must be subjugated to her man.
fuck yeah! God's law for the people!
Quote:
Yes, there are different sects. I'm not ruling all Islams out by my statement. Only those who are in a sect that requires strict laws of the religion that are imposed over others.
What about anyone that tries to impose Christian law on society?
Re: after Obama retires...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wild Cobra
In fact, somplace in the Bible, it says God's followers are to be law abiding.
Isn't that a textbook definition of a religion 'dictating the imposition of law on society'?
Re: after Obama retires...
Gotta love those Cafeteria Christians.
Re: after Obama retires...
Some of those who the profess traditional creeds of the USA yearn for official recognition as a protected minority against the crypto-pagan, crypto-libertarian onslaught of popular culture.
When government is called on to protect traditional values, you can be pretty sure their power and influence is reaching a low ebb in society.
Re: after Obama retires...
Traditional values need a government bailout too.
Re: after Obama retires...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Winehole23
Traditional values need a government bailout too.
Ive heard that traditional values is going public.
I might go in on a few shares.
Re: after Obama retires...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Blake
What about anyone that tries to impose Christian law on society?
The distinction you don't see, where I draw the line, is that the Bible does not tell God's followers to impose God's will on others.
Re: after Obama retires...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ElNono
Isn't that a textbook definition of a religion 'dictating the imposition of law on society'?
You too?
No. It's telling God's followers to obey local laws.
It doesn't tell people to impose God's will upon others. Does it?
Re: after Obama retires...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wild Cobra
Personal justification is not the same as having to follow a strict law of your religion. In fact, somplace in the Bible, it says God's followers are to be law abiding. God's law if for the people. Not for the government.
So if God's law conflicts with the law, like, for instance, stoning children who talk back to their parents, then...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wild Cobra
So they are false followers? Wouldn't their own disown them?
Wouldn't this apply?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wild Cobra
Yes, there are different sects. I'm not ruling all Islams out by my statement. Only those who are in a sect that requires strict laws of the religion that are imposed over others.
It's their right to believe whatever cuckoo nonsense they wish.
Re: after Obama retires...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wild Cobra
The distinction you don't see, where I draw the line, is that the Bible does not tell God's followers to impose God's will on others.
Uhm... are you sure about that? :lol I mean, if God commanded his followers to oeby his laws, and they conflict with a regular law, wouldn't that imply God telling his followers to impose God's will?
Re: after Obama retires...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Blake
Ive heard that traditional values is going public.
I might go in on a few shares.
http://www.collider.com/uploads/imag...brando__1_.jpg
Re: after Obama retires...
^^^Iconic emphasis on tradition and family values. 1972.
Re: after Obama retires...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wild Cobra
No. It's telling God's followers to obey local laws.
And what happens if they don't?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wild Cobra
It doesn't tell people to impose God's will upon others. Does it?
Does every muslim you know tries to impose their God's will upon you? Or you don't know any muslims?
Re: after Obama retires...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
LnGrrrR
Uhm... are you sure about that? :lol I mean, if God commanded his followers to oeby his laws, and they conflict with a regular law, wouldn't that imply God telling his followers to impose God's will?
Wouldn't you be called a 'false follower' (whatever that means) if you deem yourself a christian and don't follow god's laws?
Re: after Obama retires...
So I see Darrins is still stuck on the non existent shariah issue..
Re: after Obama retires...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Wild Cobra
The distinction you don't see, where I draw the line, is that the Bible does not tell God's followers to impose God's will on others.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blake
What about anyone that tries to impose Christian law on society?