Should the GOP impeach Obama after midterms?

I came across this article and wondered if it's possible for the GOP to get back at Obama for allegedly destroying our country within such a short span of time. As an added bonus, read some of the comments after the article and be thankful that the posters in our midst are not total nutjobs.

http://www.impeachobamacampaign.com/...fter-midterms/

Some issues include Sestak job allegations, New Black Panther case, ACORN, and individual privacy concerns. These aren't exactly war crimes, intelligence leaks, or for being an overall shit for brains...but they could be serious offenses if prosecuted by the rights hands. :p:

How are they going to impeach Bush for the New Black Panther case?

this is horse shit. more ways to fleece the public, and spend taxpayer money, more ways for racist repugs to show their collective ass.

"allegedly destroying our country within such a short span of time"

link proving the allegation?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by boutons_deux

"allegedly destroying our country within such a short span of time"

link proving the allegation?

---

Dear b_d,

I said "allegedly" because it is alleged by many angry white people that Obama is destroying our country. I don't have any evidence to prove that allegation, nor do I think the angry white people can prove it without showing some level of hypocrisy for letting Bush hurt the country.

@Chump: If I recall correctly, the New Black Panther controversy is about the prosecutors visiting with the Obama Administration and cutting some shady deals or something. Not really sure, but whatever happened is Obama's fault.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Stringer_Bell

@Chump: If I recall correctly, the New Black Panther controversy is about the prosecutors visiting with the Obama Administration and cutting some shady deals or something. Not really sure, but whatever happened is Obama's fault.

---

It's actually about handing down a light civil injunction instead of a slightly less light civil injunction after the Bush administration had already dropped any criminal investigation months earlier.

I want them to try. That would backfire big time.

If it is discovered Obama committed an impeachable offense, absolutely. But, I'm not in favor of a witch hunt to discover wrong-doing.

No need to impeach. Voters will be heard.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Yonivore

If it is discovered Obama committed an impeachable offense, absolutely. But, I'm not in favor of a witch hunt to discover wrong-doing.

---

No shit. Let such dirty pool be left to the demonrats.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wild Cobra

No shit. Let such dirty pool be left to the demonrats.

---

:lol Yeah, the Democrats have a long history of playing that game. I believe the last time they went that way was during Dirty Dick's unquestionably impeachable offense, which the GOP was 100% behind.

Which party actually created impeachment proceedings out of whole cloth in recent memory? Was it the Libertarians? No, that's not right...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wild Cobra

No shit. Let such dirty pool be left to the demonrats.

---

laughable

:lmao

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wild Cobra

No shit. Let such dirty pool be left to the demonrats.

---

:lmao

Just when you think he can't get any more stupid.

Oh my fucking god you have to be kidding me...so some dickface dumbshit starts phony wars...does illegal wire taps...okays torturing...is basically a war criminal...but nah...that was all okay...no need to try to impeach...it's cool...this is just getting ridiculous...but now this...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wild Cobra

No shit. Let such dirty pool be left to the demonrats.

---

:lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao
:lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao
:lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao
:lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao
:lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by fraga

Oh my fucking god you have to be kidding me...so some dickface dumbshit starts phony wars...does illegal wire taps...okays torturing...is basically a war criminal...but nah...that was all okay...no need to try to impeach...it's cool...this is just getting ridiculous...but now this...

---

Didn't the Democrats hold fake impeachment hearings of President Bush in the basement of the Capitol or something?

Did they get a fake impeachment?

Pretty sad when you have control of both houses of Congress and you have to resort to playing Congress in the basement.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Yonivore

Didn't the Democrats hold fake impeachment hearings of President Bush in the basement of the Capitol or something?

Did they get a fake impeachment?

---

Didn't the Republicans hold real impeachment hearings about a blowjob?

Did they get a real impeachement?

Quote:

---

Pretty sad when you have control of both houses of Congress and you have to resort to playing Congress in the basement.

---

They did not have control of either house of Congress.

Ken Starr and Mellon-Scaif were on and financed witch hunts.

WH Christmas cards list? holy shit.

The subpoenas and witch hunting we saw against Clinton's exec will be nothing compared to what the current, uglier, nastier, fringe-ier Repugs will do if they get control of either chamber.

I want them to impeach him. They'll never get a conviction. And it will backfire immensely.

try in vain? like that jackass from ohio with his hot slut model wife?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wild Cobra

No shit. Let such dirty pool be left to the demonrats.

---

http://www.havelshouseofhistory.com/...l.%20Disp..jpg

http://www.bradblog.com/Images/Georg...WSJ_030606.gif

http://law.jrank.org/article_images/..._0_img0209.jpg

:lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao
:lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao
:lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao
:lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao
:lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao

Oh HELL no...especially if they win the House AND the Senate. They can just shoot him the finger and he can whine like a little girl but it won't do him a fucking bit of good. Obama will be gone in 2012 anyway. Good riddance.

Here's Krugman's take:

August 29, 2010

It’s Witch-Hunt Season

By PAUL KRUGMAN

The last time a Democrat sat in the White House, he faced a nonstop witch hunt by his political opponents. Prominent figures on the right accused Bill and Hillary Clinton of everything from drug smuggling to murder. And once Republicans took control of Congress, they subjected the Clinton administration to unrelenting harassment — at one point taking 140 hours of sworn testimony over accusations that the White House had misused its Christmas card list.

Now it’s happening again — except that this time it’s even worse. Let’s turn the floor over to Rush Limbaugh: “Imam Hussein Obama,” he recently declared, is “probably the best anti-American president we’ve ever had.”

To get a sense of how much it matters when people like Mr. Limbaugh talk like this, bear in mind that he’s an utterly mainstream figure within the Republican Party; bear in mind, too, that unless something changes the political dynamics, Republicans will soon control at least one house of Congress. This is going to be very, very ugly.

So where is this rage coming from? Why is it flourishing? What will it do to America?

Anyone who remembered the 1990s could have predicted something like the current political craziness. What we learned from the Clinton years is that a significant number of Americans just don’t consider government by liberals — even very moderate liberals — legitimate. Mr. Obama’s election would have enraged those people even if he were white. Of course, the fact that he isn’t, and has an alien-sounding name, adds to the rage.

By the way, I’m not talking about the rage of the excluded and the dispossessed: Tea Partiers are relatively affluent, and nobody is angrier these days than the very, very rich. Wall Street has turned on Mr. Obama with a vengeance: last month Steve Schwarzman, the billionaire chairman of the Blackstone Group, the private equity giant, compared proposals to end tax loopholes for hedge fund managers with the Nazi invasion of Poland.

And powerful forces are promoting and exploiting this rage. Jane Mayer’s new article in The New Yorker about the superrich Koch brothers and their war against Mr. Obama has generated much-justified attention, but as Ms. Mayer herself points out, only the scale of their effort is new: billionaires like Richard Mellon Scaife waged a similar war against Bill Clinton.

Meanwhile, the right-wing media are replaying their greatest hits. In the 1990s, Mr. Limbaugh used innuendo to feed anti-Clinton mythology, notably the insinuation that Hillary Clinton was complicit in the death of Vince Foster. Now, as we’ve just seen, he’s doing his best to insinuate that Mr. Obama is a Muslim. Again, though, there’s an extra level of craziness this time around: Mr. Limbaugh is the same as he always was, but now seems tame compared with Glenn Beck.

And where, in all of this, are the responsible Republicans, leaders who will stand up and say that some partisans are going too far? Nowhere to be found.

To take a prime example: the hysteria over the proposed Islamic center in lower Manhattan almost makes one long for the days when former President George W. Bush tried to soothe religious hatred, declaring Islam a religion of peace. There were good reasons for his position: there are a billion Muslims in the world, and America can’t afford to make all of them its enemies.

But here’s the thing: Mr. Bush is still around, as are many of his former officials. Where are the statements, from the former president or those in his inner circle, preaching tolerance and denouncing anti-Islam hysteria? On this issue, as on many others, the G.O.P. establishment is offering a nearly uniform profile in cowardice.

So what will happen if, as expected, Republicans win control of the House? We already know part of the answer: Politico reports that they’re gearing up for a repeat performance of the 1990s, with a “wave of committee investigations” — several of them over supposed scandals that we already know are completely phony.

We can expect the G.O.P. to play chicken over the federal budget, too; I’d put even odds on a 1995-type government shutdown sometime over the next couple of years.

It will be an ugly scene, and it will be dangerous, too. The 1990s were a time of peace and prosperity; this is a time of neither. In particular, we’re still suffering the after-effects of the worst economic crisis since the 1930s, and we can’t afford to have a federal government paralyzed by an opposition with no interest in helping the president govern. But that’s what we’re likely to get.

If I were President Obama, I’d be doing all I could to head off this prospect, offering some major new initiatives on the economic front in particular, if only to shake up the political dynamic. But my guess is that the president will continue to play it safe, all the way into catastrophe.

==========

Repugs, neo-c*nts, conservatives, Wall St, corporations, oil/gas/coal corps are all much bigger threats to America than Muslim terrorists.

The GOP has no chance of taking the Senate and little chance of taking the House...

This is nuts. A man starts an illegal war, but if a President overspends, he needs to be Impeached?

It's not an article meant to remove an ineffective governor. That is remedied by an election. I can see the GOP doing this, but they'd be raping the US Constitution to do it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Darrin

This is nuts. A man starts an illegal war, but if a President overspends, he needs to be Impeached?

It's not an article meant to remove an ineffective governor. That is remedied by an election. I can see the GOP doing this, but they'd be raping the US Constitution to do it.

---

Hard to believe that going to war undcer false pretenses means nothing to the same people who are bent out of shape over job offers and teleprompters..

they shouldn't and they wouldn't try even with a super majority. this blog is just fundraising off of people's hatred of obama.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Darrin

A man starts an illegal war

---

I wish people would drop this claim or get it right. It was not illegal, it was unsanctioned (by the UN) and immoral depending on your perspective.

UN has no legal standing, so unless you prove the war was against US laws (it wasn't) then at least choose a more appropriate term.

:lol at this thread

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by fraga

Oh my fucking god you have to be kidding me...so some dickface dumbshit starts phony wars...does illegal wire taps...okays torturing...is basically a war criminal...but nah...that was all okay...no need to try to impeach...it's cool...this is just getting ridiculous...but now this...

---

Aren't you dizzy after all that spin?