...make sure he's sitting. Or else, he might collapse on you.
Report: Castro says Cuban model doesn't work
Printable View
...make sure he's sitting. Or else, he might collapse on you.
Report: Castro says Cuban model doesn't work
But, wait! There's more...
Fidel to Ahmadinejad: 'Stop Slandering the Jews'
I haven't bothered to read either article [I don't much care what Fidel Castro thinks] so, it could be some tease that is actually contradicted in the story. I just couldn't resist.
But, hey! It could also be that Castro senses his own mortality is nearing an end and wants to get right with God.
Stranger things have happened. I'm sure Che momentarily quit begging for ice water in Hell.
Thanks for confirming what we all already knew about the topics you start in here.Quote:
Originally Posted by Yonivore
Now, if you could transplant that conclusion-jumping to things that really matter like Islamic Terrorism...we might just get somewhere.Quote:
Originally Posted by CuckingFunt
Why is that? Because the only way to fight a problem we've blown completely out of proportion is by thoughtlessly jumping to inane conclusions?Quote:
Originally Posted by Yonivore
You're probably right, but it's really not my style.
we have you for that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Yonivore
You're the one jumping to inane conclusions. I just thought that talent would be better spent in another direction.Quote:
Originally Posted by CuckingFunt
No, I'm not. You posted two articles, without reading them, based solely on their somewhat inflammatory titles. This would seem to support the already suggested habit of starting batshit ridiculous threads in here for no reason other than to get people arguing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Yonivore
No, it doesn't but, your posts support the already confirmed habit of hijacking threads with your batshit personal attacks on a person you've never met.Quote:
Originally Posted by CuckingFunt
Keep it up...nothing like being predictable.
Anyone want to talk about Castro?
OK.Quote:
Originally Posted by Yonivore
You don't actually read articles about Islamic terrorism either.
She's not a Fucking Cunt for no reason now, is she?Quote:
Originally Posted by Yonivore
u mad cuz she reminded you of your stalking that poor woman?Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
Personal attacks? Where? I commented on your posting style. Don't post stupid shit and I won't call it stupid.Quote:
Originally Posted by Yonivore
With someone who hasn't read any more than the headlines? Not really.Quote:
Originally Posted by Yonivore
From the person so bent out of shape as to have resorted to calling me names...Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
Who here ever claimed that Cuba's economic model worked?
Michael Moore, apparently.Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
Guess we'd know the answer to that question for sure if Yoni had bothered to read the article and was able to post something of value along with the headline.
I wouldn't do it if you didn't make your alias as such. Your alias does mean something, doesn't it?Quote:
Originally Posted by CuckingFunt
My screenname is something I thought was amusing in the however many seconds I spent thinking about it four years ago.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
And my screenname is CuckingFunt, for the record. You've called me Fucking Cunt today (twice, if you count Cunt in a different thread), intentionally, because you clearly think it's getting me back for some perceived slight in the tech forum. Regardless my chosen screenname, your act is a specific attempt to insult me.
Then I'm sorry I figured it was partially in humorous nature and wouldn't have said "cunt" if it wasn't withing your name. If I use it again, it will then be meant as an insult. Otherwise, I will refrain from that in the future.Quote:
Originally Posted by CuckingFunt
I do suggest you stop purposely infuriating me as you know such past events were explained. If you cannot stomach the repercussions, I suggest you stop inciting them.
lol infuriating.
Sean Penn, too.Quote:
Originally Posted by CuckingFunt
So, wait a minute, you claim not to have called me Fucking Cunt as an insult, but then suggest it was a repercussion for purposely infuriating you?Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
Firstly, just because I recognized that you were insulting me doesn't mean I was insulted. I really couldn't care less what you call me. Well... actually, given your history of... let's call it chivalrous internet research... I'd probably be a little freaked if you suddenly called me by my first name.
Secondly, purposely infuriating you? Get the fuck over yourself. I don't care about you, or anyone else here, near enough to invest time and energy in personal attacks or internet vendettas. I said what I said in the other thread because I thought it was funny. That's all. I would suggest it's you who should watch your posting habits if you can't stomach having your past posts referenced in an unflattering light.
No, I meant it as an insult, but I would have never used "cunt" if it wasn't your name rearranged, which is obviously "fucking cunt."Quote:
Originally Posted by CuckingFunt
It's very rare that I use that term referring to any woman.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
Something doesn't add up, here.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
Does it matter. I simply didn't mean it to sting as much as it must have. My choice of words is poor sometime.Quote:
Originally Posted by CuckingFunt
How about letting it go. Can we stay on topic please?
:lmaoQuote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
On what topic? This thread never had a topic. Ever. It was started by Yoni as a blank canvas. A throw-shit-at-the-wall-and-see-what-argument-sticks thread that has, since the opening posts, followed a simple, linear path with no diversions or changes in subject. If you're tired of this conversation, then stop engaging, but let's not be silly enough to call for a return to empty postings of unread articles.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
The topic is Fidel Castro's apparent renunciation of Communism.
Pretty huge, if you ask me...I'm sure Cuban expatriates think it's more than shit thrown at a wall.
good thread. :tu
michael moore is advocating communism?Quote:
Originally Posted by Yonivore
He's a big fan of Cuba.Quote:
Originally Posted by George Gervin's Afro
Moore took some sick americans over there because he is sooooo impressed with the health care program.
And Cuba was more than happy to help with his propaganda then.Quote:
Originally Posted by jack sommerset
Barry needs to send Castro a card or something. Let him know every leader has a down time and second guesses themselves but communism is the way to go.
Huge enough to warrant sharing with us in the Political Forum, but not huge enough to warrant reading the article you're sharing... Where does that rank on a 1 - 10 scale of importance?Quote:
Originally Posted by Yonivore
You act as though posting in this forum carries some sort of weight...Quote:
Originally Posted by CuckingFunt
So, to answer your question; posting in the SpursTalk.com political forum is about as important as whatever was said by or about Castro in either of the articles -- somewhere between 0 and 0.001 (on your scale).
That's not what I asked.Quote:
Originally Posted by Yonivore
I think it is...Quote:
Originally Posted by CuckingFunt
...and, I answered:Quote:
Originally Posted by CuckingFunt
Quote:
Originally Posted by Me
She's acting like Chucking Fump, isn't she?Quote:
Originally Posted by Yonivore
It's not like I disguised my answer -- it was a short post.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
Then you think wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by Yonivore
I was asking where Fidel Castro's apparent renunciation of Communism ranked on a scale of importance, since you claimed it to be a huge topic despite not feeling it deserved any more of your time than that spent reading the headline.Quote:
Originally Posted by CuckingFuntHuge enough to warrant sharing with us in the Political Forum, but not huge enough to warrant reading the article you're sharing... Where does that rank on a 1 - 10 scale of importance?Quote:
Originally Posted by Yonivore
Yoni, it's so huge you didn't read the fucking 12-paragraph article about it.
Can you not understand how stupid you are?
No, I don't.Quote:
Originally Posted by CuckingFunt
No, you weren't.Quote:
Originally Posted by CuckingFunt
Shall we analyze this poorly constructed sentence?
This is a statement you made, not me.Quote:
Originally Posted by CuckingFunt
Since the previous statement was comparing "warranted sharing" with "warranted reading," Your use of "that" [whether intentionally or not] refers to the comparison between posting and reading not Castro's apparent renunciation of Communism.Quote:
Originally Posted by CuckingFunt
Thanks for playing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by yoni
And, as for her being like Chumpy; nah. All he ever says anymore is, "This user is on your Ignore List."Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
Where does this thread rank on a mental masturbation scale of 1-10?
'bout the same.Quote:
Originally Posted by Veterinarian
It's not like you read anything, dipshit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Yonivore
That doesn't make sense according to any possible interpretation of either formal or conversational English.Quote:
Originally Posted by Yonivore
Pretty fucking high. I'm thinking... eight, at least.Quote:
Originally Posted by Veterinarian
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yonivore
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yonivore
Quote:
Originally Posted by yoni
LOL...Quote:
Originally Posted by Yonivore
Me too.
Her responses to you have been classic Chump. Always asking for more when you already answered.
LMAO bragging about your messageboard handicapQuote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
:lolQuote:
Originally Posted by CuckingFunt
Thanks playing for
Chump is the only one I have on IGNORE. I don't consider it a handicap, but tuning out someone that infuriates me. He seldom has anything of value to contribute. I had him on IGNORE before, then took him off. Decided I can do without anything he says.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blake
:lmao Awesome, thanks for posting.Quote:
Originally Posted by DMX7
lol infuriates
he wants you to back up your arguments with facts... you never can so it pisses you off when he calls you on it..Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
This thread is proof that libtards suck at posting on this forum. Two interesting articles are posted about Castro and all you do is slam the person who postem them. WTF?
Any of you actually have an opinion about the articles?
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarrinS
Quote:
Originally Posted by OP
:lmao
This board really really reallly needs a witty conservative or two. Its so lopsided its not even funny.
Great thread.
DarrinS slams the libtards for not posting opinions and for slamming the OP right before he failed to post his opinion while slamming the libtards.Quote:
Originally Posted by MannyIsGod
It's just not a fair fight.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MannyIsGod
:lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao :lmao
laughing at you..not with you..Quote:
Originally Posted by DarrinS
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blake
After reading the first Goldberg piece, I haven't made up my mind whether Castro is being reflective and serious (as he now fancies himself as an international statesman) or whether he's just senile.
:lolQuote:
Originally Posted by CuckingFunt
She IS ChumpDumperQuote:
Originally Posted by Yonivore
Same poster.
As for the OP - had already read them when I saw the thread....Castro has surprising views (to me) of the Jews - based on childhood expereinces of bigotry against them; and is, frankly stating the obvious about the Cuban economy. If he wants to be taken seriously AT ALL, what else can he say?
doubtfulQuote:
Originally Posted by 101A
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blake
Yeah, I should have bookmarked it; busted him/herself in a thread a couple of years ago; I thought more people knew.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CuckingFunt
the posts are both marked at 7:34Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
very doubtful.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
answers own post?Quote:
Originally Posted by CuckingFunt
extremely doubtful
Quote:
Originally Posted by 101A
:lolQuote:
Originally Posted by 101A
At least tell us the circumstances that lead you to this conclusion.
Actually, I thought it was an interesting article. I ain't skeered of getting Commie eye cooties.
Yeah, I'm curious to know that, too.Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
Why should we read them if the OP didn't? For all I know, the article could be complete BS.Quote:
Originally Posted by DarrinS
It doesn't matter what facts we come up with. Chump continues to be antagonistic over matters asked and answered. That gets tiresome.Quote:
Originally Posted by George Gervin's Afro
No it's not. Two windows open or two systems, canned messages, and "submit reply" to both.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blake
I realize it's technically possible.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
E x t r e m e l y d o u b t f u l.
I've played two yahoo games before with two screen names at the same time. Thing is, you have to use two different browsers. Easy enough. I think most of us have both Firefox and Explorer. You often cannot do it in two windows with the same browser, but when you use two different browsers it should work.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blake
Disclaimer.
I only have one screen name here, else i would try it for proof.
http://i297.photobucket.com/albums/m...r/facepalm.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra