Bogut available?

Hasn't he been injured a lot since he's been in the league?

Anway, I doubt Milwaukee is looking to deal him, plus he has about 4 years/ 50 mil left on his contract. It would most likely take one of the big 3 or RJ to make a deal work....

Blah they aren't trading Bogut. No way in hell he is available.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DesignatedT

Hasn't he been injured a lot since he's been in the league?

Anway, I doubt Milwaukee is looking to deal him, plus he has about 4 years/ 50 mil left on his contract. It would most likely take one of the big 3 or RJ to make a deal work....

---

Just looked it up actually thanks to Google.

It would take Splitter, Udoka, McDyess, rights to De Cola and maybe a first rounder?

If McDyess was bought out and brought back would you do it?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by EricD

I'd trade Splitter, Udoka, rights to Cola, Williams maybe?

---

If you throw in a second rounder they might actually toss you Jennings too for that deal.

I think im being trolled.

lol yeah..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ynh

If you throw in a second rounder they might actually toss you Jennings too for that deal.

---

If Milwaukee falls out of contention for the playoffs by the trading deadline they might just do it. Especially if they net Splitter for a bargain (3.4 million) and shave off 50 million in the future.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by EricD

Just curious.

Spurs need a player like him. A post that plays like a man and defends the paint.

I don't know if any of you all watched the Mavs game tonight, but he made the Mavs shit bricks whenever they penetrated in the lane.

Spurs need that.





P.S-- I'm kind of new to this site and I absolutely love it. My goal is surpass a lot of people in posts and someday get big bold black letters under my handle. Anyone know how long it takes?

Anyway I'm going to keep watching more games and give my best opinions on whatever matter is discussed throughout the forums.

Back to the question on Bogut though. I'm not sure what it will take, so will some of you people with the big bold and black lettering let me know what it would take?

Thanks again

:toast

:flag:

---

is u also new to da nba???????

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by EricD

If Milwaukee falls out of contention for the playoffs by the trading deadline they might just do it. Especially if they net Splitter for a bargain (3.4 million) and shave off 50 million in the future.

---

Like I said you should offer a second round pick and they will probably throw jennings in.. I'm sure thy will because they will shave off even more money.. and even a greater amount if you think about the fact that a couple years from now he won't be on a rookie deal.

Spurs should just pay attention to the standings and offer second rounders and bench players for the teams that don't make the playoffs best players. Not bad thinking. Sounds like a plan.

Sac isn't going to make the playoffs.. Perhaps Evans and Cousins for a second and bonner? They save money and you get some good talent.

I'm just a gray name, too. :(

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by iManu

I'm just a gray name, too. :(

---

what's with the gray name anyways? what does that mean? sorry i'm not a nerd.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fpoonsie

another BUMP classic

---

also who is GNSF?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by migol

what's with the gray name anyways? what does that mean? sorry i'm not a nerd.

---

Not sure. I don't really pay attention to that usually.

We do have a few people that get pinked periodically though...thats hilarious.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Darkwaters

Not sure. I don't really pay attention to that usually.

We do have a few people that get pinked periodically though...thats hilarious.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kori Ellis

Back in the day, I used to have to change all the titles (under your usernames) myself. So when I did it, I would change the poster from (green at the time, grey now) to black. That way, I could easily recognize at a glance whose title I had already changed.

However, now you guys can change your own titles - therefore, I don't just go around changing people from grey to black.

---

They've got Brandon Jennings, so Tony Parker doesn't mean much to them. Tim Duncan is retiring as a Spur, there's no doubt that he's not tradeable. To be honest though, Manu Ginobili isn't exactly tradeable either and he'd probably have to be the one we'd have to send over along with other up and comers for Bogut. It'd be a stupid trade for us and it'd never happen. In a perfect world it'd be nice to just trade for someone like that, but realistically we're not.

Now Bonner and something else for Ilyasova (an outside shooting big who can play PF and SF) is an interesting prospect, but I doubt that'd ever happen either.

Quit with all these lame ass threads please...Nobody is gonna trade for Bogut, nobody is gonna trade for thabeet, and hopefully somebody will take away your thread starting ability. STFU

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by EricD

BTW ..

100th post

Didn't feel like making my own thread ( that be stupid) so I thought I'd share it on here.

:toast

---

Congratulations.

I don´t think Bogut is injury prone, he just had bad luck last year.
I don´t think he is available either.
He is a very good rebonder, defender and post player. Seeing how bad the bucks are doing right now is a statement of how low of a BB-IQ Jennings and Salmons have.

So wait....EricD isn't just an EricB troll?

fucking retarded thread.

:pctoss

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by yavozerb

Quit with all these lame ass threads please...Nobody is gonna trade for Bogut, nobody is gonna trade for thabeet, and hopefully somebody will take away your thread starting ability. STFU

---

You don't have to post in threads you don't agree with you know.

It's obvious common knowledge.

LOL.. funny troll is funny...."Cola"

If you're going to suggest a trade like this one, why not propose to make an offer to the Clippers for Blake Griffin?

At least that combines targeting a completely unavailable player with proposing a deal with a front office that acts completely irrationally.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FromWayDowntown

If you're going to suggest a trade like this one, why not propose to make an offer to the Clippers for Blake Griffin?

At least that combines targeting a completely unavailable player with proposing a deal with a front office that acts completely irrationally.

---

Bonner, Vaughn, Eva Longoria, Karaulov, Javtokas, Jack Haley and a bag of chips will surely get it done, no? Not sure if I'd throw a 2nd round pick , but if I really have to...