No shit. Indy is one of the worst teams in the league at getting to the line, but the refs made more than their uniforms look like the Lakers in the fourth.Quote:
Originally Posted by ElNono
Printable View
No shit. Indy is one of the worst teams in the league at getting to the line, but the refs made more than their uniforms look like the Lakers in the fourth.Quote:
Originally Posted by ElNono
Quote:
Originally Posted by spurtech09
What a big accomplishment! ...pathetc spurt fan
This game put me in a sour mood... despite the win. The Pacers shouldn't even be hanging with us, let alone having a 15 pt lead. Thank God our D came to life in the 4th. That's the only other positive besides the W.
Quote:
Originally Posted by quentin_compson
But they beat the crap out of your pathetc team
Do you have a life besides hanging around here trolling spurs fans because you know the heat haven't won any games that mean shit this season?Quote:
Originally Posted by Crickets
http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:A...R3gATvNyeRb_I1Quote:
Originally Posted by Crickets
http://www.bbc.co.uk/insideout/south...cricket203.jpg
Wuuu-uh-oh . . .
Black you're better than that, only one cricketer you should be displayingQuote:
Originally Posted by Blackjack
http://resources2.news.com.au/images...s-anderson.jpg
This wasn't a fluke, Indiana is just bad on offense.
If Manu had made the game-winning 3 against Boston, that would've been a fluke. The win over the Rockets was a fluke. The win at Minnesota was a fluke.
Is that what that was?Quote:
Originally Posted by Muser
Just figured they hadn't got the concept of bats, baseball just yet. Interesting . . . :hat
The Pacers had like 5 days of rest or something IIRC and the Spurs were tired from playing multiple games in a short amount of time, so it's not that surprising that the game was close, but the way the Spurs played obviously became annoying after a while..
All that matters is the W..everybody knows the Spurs aren't as good as their record right now, and might not be a legit contender(IMO they aren't)..they still need a lot of work, but more important than anything, the #1 seed is the main focus right now..
site administrator made the thread noob :toastQuote:
Originally Posted by Mugen
Come on man. You're better than that. What fluke win?Quote:
Originally Posted by timvp
Spurs were messing with those kids out ther.
x1000 :tuQuote:
Originally Posted by Seventyniner
Win!
:nopeQuote:
Originally Posted by Crickets
I see it a little different. I think the Spurs were a bit bored this game. They definitely got their ass whiped by NY. and the the Boston game was very even and very close, nothing to take from there. And this game, the spurs were just bored and probably tired of the road trip.Quote:
Originally Posted by Budkin
But in the 4th quarter they started to give a shit and whop that ass. At least that shows that they are not a tired team or a hurt team.
He's not a Heat fan, he's a Rox fan who constantly invents new IDs to troll here, and his name is louis, with a small l for his small dick.Quote:
Originally Posted by GinobiliForTres
lol rockets
:wowQuote:
Originally Posted by Solid D
I guess i should have wrote in blue for you, my man.Quote:
Originally Posted by greyforest
Spurs now needing fluke wins to beat the damn Pacers, I hope Pop and RC are taking notice
For those saying this wasn't a fluke win, I'm not exactly sure what you're smoking. The Pacers were 1-for-15 in the fourth quarter. Good defense can claim some of that credit but it's definitely a fluke for a team to shoot 6% in a quarter.
:lol @ not a fluke.Quote:
Indiana's one field goal in the fourth quarter was the fewest the Pacers have made in a quarter in at least 19 years.
And seriously, I'll take the win. I really don't care how a win comes. But there's no harm in pointing out wins that required a bit of luck.
spurs did not play [email protected]Quote:
Originally Posted by timvp
just shows you this team goes as far as tp takes them
Which made it even more of a fluke :wowQuote:
Originally Posted by ducks