In fact, selective blood libel.
And selective support of thought police.
lol
Printable View
In fact, selective blood libel.
And selective support of thought police.
lol
Michelle Malkin? LMAO :lmao
But seriously, thanks for not posting her disgusting mutilated looking face.
You start with the result and work backwards. Notorious crimes like mass killings are a popular platform for the ticking time bomb hypothesis. You point to the terrible result and say s/he was a ticking time bomb. Imagination and passion do the rest.
It's time to round up all community college dropouts who post on the internets. They represent a clear and present danger to the homeland.
The Repugs/conservatives/NRA are fully to blame for the loose/non-existent/unenforced gun control regulations. Families run more background checks on nannies than gun dealer ran on the AZ shooter.
AZ got the ignominy it deserves for its non-stop, "full-bore" hate/racist/violent political talk and its insanely loose guns "laws".
America's and the world's financial disaster, the Banksters' Great Depression, is fully blamed on on conservative/VWRC deregulation of the financial sector.
townhall.com? :lol
WOW!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by boutons_deux
How very Westboro of you.
Particularly since it appears the violence bore no relationship to any right-wing rhetoric.Quote:
Originally Posted by johnsmith
In fact, it's being reported now that Loughner would become visibly angry at the sight of President Bush. Not exactly a response incited by Tea Party or right wing rhetoric.
yoni clinging to hearsay lol
The left-wing media and Obama acolytes spent a week clinging to absolutely nothing but their hatred of Sarah Palin and the Tea Party.Quote:
Originally Posted by clambake
so, they're no different from you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Yonivore
thanks for admitting that.
by the way.......a guy went on a killing spree at a democratic rally.
Sure we're different.Quote:
Originally Posted by clambake
They spent a week spreading a libel. I've spent that time pointing out that's what it was. In the end, who was right?
You're an idiot.Quote:
Originally Posted by clambake
well obama and the majority of democrats didn't blame the right so the article started off s being unfactual...Quote:
Originally Posted by Yonivore
you're a dishonest person
a blood libel :lmaoQuote:
Originally Posted by Yonivore
pimping your epic fail :lmaoQuote:
I've spent that time pointing out that's what it was.
me. a guy went on a killing spree at a democratic rally.Quote:
In the end, who was right?
you're a suckerQuote:
You're an idiot.
Nor did they stand up -- from the very beginning -- and call for restraint and patience (as in the Fort Hood Massacre). Those that didn't blame the right were perfectly willing to stand by while their minions in the media did it for them.Quote:
Originally Posted by George Gervin's Afro
Not dishonest at all.
It's only when it became apparent most Americans weren't buying the narrative that Obama attempted to call off the dogs. Unfortunately, many were so invested in the meme they just can't control themselves.
so it wasn' true that neither obama or his supporters blamed the right..thanks for enforcing that malkin was lyingQuote:
Originally Posted by Yonivore
how do you know what people are thinking?
They're called Asians asshole. Bigots...Quote:
Originally Posted by DMX7
:p:
No, you're making no sense.Quote:
Originally Posted by George Gervin's Afro
apparently your going to play stupid.. obama didn't blame the right... then premise of malkin's essay...Quote:
Originally Posted by Yonivore
I haven't read Malkin's essay and I've never said Obama blamed the right. Only that he was slow to admonish his followers on blaming the right.Quote:
Originally Posted by George Gervin's Afro
so you read the article in the previous thread...but not this one...okQuote:
Originally Posted by Yonivore
More than likely, I've been responding to what has been posted not what Malkin said.Quote:
Originally Posted by George Gervin's Afro
But, if it'll make you feel better, I'll go read the essay. Is it in the OP of this thread?
You're right. I read the essay and Malkin unfairly conflated two separate issues to infer Obama was blaming the right for violence. I think she combined the two ideas that 1) the left is prone to blame violence on the right and 2) Obama and his followers blame everything that ails the world (or something to that effect) on people with whom they disagree.
I will say, I've never heard Obama blame the right for the Tucson massacre. However, he has spent pretty much the past two years blaming Bush for all his problems.
Also, the specific incidents she cites, later in the essay, can be found elsewhere and, I think, are dead on about how much of the left reacts to violence.
Their first reaction is to try and pin it on right-wing ideology or rhetoric. The Times Square bomber being a good example. Also, I don't recall Obama ever standing up and counseling restraint unless it was believed the violence was the result of left-wing or Islamic ideology.