If they did, the problem could be addressed rather easily, don't you think?
Printable View
If they did, the problem could be addressed rather easily, don't you think?
*are* or *can be*?Quote:
Originally Posted by Winehole23
Sorry, while I will readily admit to a certain level of dumbassery on the part of liberals/Democrats, I do think that the core of modern conservatism seems to be deeply logically flawed, and I think that has profound implications when it comes to the types of people who are attracted to that set of beliefs.
Sure Yoni has a ready-made opposite in boutons, but is there a conservative/republican Randomguy? Chumpdumper?
101A seems to be closest in my mind, when he has the time.
This experience parallels other mixed forums I have seen.
I'm curious. What traits would the conservative/republican Randomguy need to possess?Quote:
Originally Posted by RandomGuy
Yoni's opposite is NBADan. Both are relatively intelligent and emotionally stable liars. boutons' closest opposite is ducks, but ducks doesn't post nearly as much.
There are plenty of reasonable people on this board on both ends.
Take your pick. Both work for me.Quote:
Originally Posted by RandomGuy
Confirmation bias?Quote:
Originally Posted by RandomGuy
Maybe the conservative RG has better things to do with his time than lord it over bulletin board lightweights all day, and ChumpDumper has been known to support Republican candidates in the past. (According to ChumpDumper)Quote:
Originally Posted by RandomGuy
Good story.Quote:
Originally Posted by RandomGuy
What an arrogant prick.Quote:
Originally Posted by RandomGuy
Bizzarro RG would be likeable, humble, and polite.
The idea that the GOP has some kind of lock on stupidity or fallaciousness is itself a piece of colossal stupidity and fallacious to boot, but apparently it's still good propaganda.
That said, the Dems are much worse at the ideology game and are institutionally maybe a decade or two behind the GOP. Better get cracking.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TeyshaBlue
Exit stage left!:lol
http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog....%20left(2).jpg
Come back Yoni,
It's going to be great when 650,000 able bodied Americans leave the supply pool.
because
A. They "no longer have to work". -- (i.e. lottery winners)
B. They "can downshift to less demanding employment" (i.e. drug dealing)
C. "because insurance will be available outside the job" (bought and paid for by the millions who chose not to exit the supply pool)
Maybe I will stick to vacuous one-liners. Much better solution.Quote:
Originally Posted by Winehole23