Printable View
That darn Obongo
Obama is owned just like Bush was owned. You cant trust a damn word from any president. This proves Obama is a puppet. Just like Bush.
Your elected officials are $owned$.
Obongo? Cuz he played the asses of white females with a college education like bongos during the Presidential elections? Yep yep yep yep yep!Quote:
Originally Posted by jack sommerset
Point of clarification, if you please: In that clip Obama wants a Public Option, not a requirement for all citizen's to buy health insurance, right?
Yeah, except I don't recall Bush trying to implement Obamacare.Quote:
Originally Posted by Parker2112
Iraq was worse than Obamacare...or just as bad at least, and just as unconstitutional.Quote:
Originally Posted by Yonivore
The two party paradigm is a fraud.
And such a blatant example gets ignored here.
I would put this story on ignore too if I wanted to continue to invest my faith in one of the two major parties/frauds.
Wakedafuggup.
One man stands above the fray :toast
One man is a fraud.
Wakedafuggup.
Does Ron Paul have a health care plan?
Yes, he does....it's run by the government....
Should have been more specific. Not his own insurance -- everyone knows he has the "Cadillac" plan per Cosmic Cowboy -- I wondered if he had a health care reform plan.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarrinS
you know fuckface, that provision to mandate people buy insurance was something lobbied by the insurance companies and demanded by the GOP so they wouldn't lose customers that would just rely on Obamacare only when they got sick or injured.
you fucks wanted that shit and no wyou use the very thing you wanted against it.
you fucks are retarded. Obamacare is good for the country and you are not going to win.
Hey, if you can't get the point across, you can always cuss and use names. Reminds me of one of those guys on that show a few years ago, Growing up Gotti.
reminds me of the nba forumQuote:
Originally Posted by sickdsm
i wonder how cheap healthcare would be if there was no health insurance nor a socialized system. do yall think healthcare costs would be drastically reduced because doctors wouldnt have to pay overhead?
Except the war wasn't unconstitutional. Obamacare is. Don't you think any one liberal or state would have brought the war topic to a judge if there was a chance of declaring it unconstitutional?Quote:
Originally Posted by Parker2112
Darrins Lies
not "ruling" but "rulings" with more to come. Vinson's is widely seen as outlier
The war was treason, with the criminals dubya, dickhead, Repugs lying about WMD, Saddam-AQ, Saddam-9/11.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
Then why isn't someone convicted? What wasn't it taken to court? Just because you don't understand those concepts, and want your opinion to be fact, doesn't make it so.Quote:
Originally Posted by boutons_deux
Like Clinton didn't go after the Poppy Repugs (and got nothing in return), Barry didn't go after the dubya Repugs (and got nothing in return).
Because the Dems are stupid, dickless wimps doesn't absolve the Repugs of crimes. Absence of prosecution isn't absence of guilt
...
...
LOL...
If you say it three times, does your wish come true?
[email protected] of women. Chewy is the only woman anyone has claimed Obongo has been with. As for white ass, Larry Sinclair is on the record saying barry hit that. Our president likes the cock.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stringer_Bell
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
Irony alert!
Quote:
Originally Posted by jack sommerset
like clockwork..:lmao
jack clearly likes it too.Quote:
Originally Posted by George Gervin's Afro
Even conservative legal scholars are debunking this headline seeking waste of taxpayer dollars by conservative Governors.....while they fire teachers....
Conservative legal scholar: We already regulate inactivity
By Greg Sargent
LinkQuote:
In an interview with me just now, a conservative law professor made an interesting case for the individual mandate: In multiple cases, he said, the federal government has already regulated "inactivity," and it has passed muster with the Constitution.
The cases this professor cited: Jury duty, and the draft.
New York University law professor Rick Hills describes himself as a "registered Republican and outspoken conservative," but he maintains that the primary argument conservatives use against the mandate -- that it's unconstitutional to regulate economic inactivity by forcing people to buy insurance, as Judge Vinson ruled -- is bunk.
Hills frames the question this way: If the federal government can't tell people they don't have the right to refuse to buy insurance, then why was it okay for the federal government to regulate people's "pacifism," i.e., their refusal to fight in wars? Why is it okay for the government to regulate people's refusal to serve on juries?
"If you can regulate inaction to raise juries, and you can regulate inaction to raise an army, then why isn't there equally an implied power to conscript people to buy insurance, to serve the goal of regulating the interstate insurance market?" Hill asks.