When state dept. talking head PJ Crowley was asked if the murder of two U.S. airmen at the Frankfurt airport was a terrorist attack:
"Was the shooting of Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords a terrorist attack? I mean, you have to look at the evidence and look at the motivation and then you make a judgment".
When state dept. talking head PJ Crowley was asked if the murder of two U.S. airmen at the Frankfurt airport was a terrorist attack:
"Was the shooting of Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords a terrorist attack? I mean, you have to look at the evidence and look at the motivation and then you make a judgment".
There is a gulf between knowing that it *probably* was terrorism and being able to prove it, and assert it as a fact.
What is unbelievable is how fucktardedly partisan you are about everything that comes down the pike.
03-08-2011
TeyshaBlue
Re: Un-freaking-believable
Quote:
Originally Posted by RandomGuy
There is a gulf between knowing that it *probably* was terrorism and being able to prove it, and assert it as a fact.
What is unbelievable is how fucktardedly partisan you are about everything that comes down the pike.
If all you have is a hammer.....
03-08-2011
DarrinS
Re: Un-freaking-believable
Quote:
Originally Posted by RandomGuy
There is a gulf between knowing that it *probably* was terrorism and being able to prove it, and assert it as a fact.
What is unbelievable is how fucktardedly partisan you are about everything that comes down the pike.
I just find it strange that the same bunch that jumped on the "crosshairs" metaphor can't bring themselves to say jihad or radical Islam when, by all accounts, the shooter yelled "Alahu Akbhar". If that's fuckktardedly partisan, so be it.
03-08-2011
Drachen
Re: Un-freaking-believable
If you just want to be general (some muslim attacking some westerner), sure, I guess I would say it is terrorism. To get into semantics, however, I would say "I don't know." This just might be a crime of passion for some perceived sleight. I would probably define terrorism as a war strategy and don't see what kind of tactical purpose this would serve (other than maybe "hey we can still get you"). The fact that the targets were military personnel may lean the other way. So really the answer is we don't know.
03-08-2011
clambake
Re: Un-freaking-believable
any attack on muslims is defined as collateral.
any attack by muslims...or anyone else, is defined as terrorism.
darrin can't see the pattern.
03-08-2011
Halberto
Re: Un-freaking-believable
Jesus... generalize much? I just don't see little isolated events like this taking down Western civilization, especially due to the ignorance from Liberals. Kind of a stretch if you ask me.
03-08-2011
DarrinS
Re: Un-freaking-believable
Quote:
Originally Posted by Halberto
Jesus... generalize much? I just don't see little isolated events like this taking down Western civilization, especially due to the ignorance from Liberals. Kind of a stretch if you ask me.
Please visit Europe.
03-08-2011
MannyIsGod
Re: Un-freaking-believable
When did you last visit Europe, Darrin?
03-08-2011
clambake
Re: Un-freaking-believable
this should be good. tell us about europe, d.
03-08-2011
clambake
Re: Un-freaking-believable
dammit manny
03-08-2011
Viva Las Espuelas
Re: Un-freaking-believable
How many people here feel/believe the ft hood incident was a terrorist attack?
03-08-2011
George Gervin's Afro
Re: Un-freaking-believable
Quote:
Originally Posted by Viva Las Espuelas
How many people here feel/believe the ft hood incident was a terrorist attack?
is any muslim who commits murder a terrorist?
03-08-2011
DarrinS
Re: Un-freaking-believable
Quote:
Originally Posted by Viva Las Espuelas
How many people here feel/believe the ft hood incident was a terrorist attack?
Just a very, very isolated incident by a crazy person. Being Muslim was only a coincidence.
Sincerely,
Denial
03-08-2011
George Gervin's Afro
Re: Un-freaking-believable
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarrinS
Just a very, very isolated incident by a crazy person. Being Muslim was only a coincidence.
Sincerely,
Denial
so the Vriginia Tech shooter was a terrorist?
nice logic
03-08-2011
MannyIsGod
Re: Un-freaking-believable
Quote:
Originally Posted by Viva Las Espuelas
How many people here feel/believe the ft hood incident was a terrorist attack?
An attack on military personal makes it very hard to call it a terrorist attack, imo.
03-08-2011
Gutter92
Re: Un-freaking-believable
Quote:
Originally Posted by George Gervin's Afro
so the Vriginia Tech shooter was a terrorist?
nice logic
Of course not, he wasn't muslim...right darrins? Seems like to you that's a pre-requisite.
03-08-2011
Gutter92
Re: Un-freaking-believable
Quote:
Originally Posted by MannyIsGod
An attack on military personal makes it very hard to call it a terrorist attack, imo.
Terrorism - "a calculated use of violence (or the threat of violence) against CIVILIANS...
03-08-2011
DarrinS
Re: Un-freaking-believable
Quote:
Originally Posted by MannyIsGod
An attack on military personal makes it very hard to call it a terrorist attack, imo.
Why?
03-08-2011
MannyIsGod
Re: Un-freaking-believable
because then its just this thing we call "war", Darrin.
03-08-2011
TeyshaBlue
Re: Un-freaking-believable
Quote:
Originally Posted by MannyIsGod
because then its just this thing we call "war", Darrin.
I just find it strange that the same bunch that jumped on the "crosshairs" metaphor can't bring themselves to say jihad or radical Islam when, by all accounts, the shooter yelled "Alahu Akbhar". If that's fuckktardedly partisan, so be it.
You're aware that racism =/= terrorism right? Did the killer have a political or sociological goal they were espousing, using this murder to further their ends?
03-08-2011
LnGrrrR
Re: Un-freaking-believable
To be fair to Darrin, an attack against a military member doesn't necessarily equate "war". And terrorist attacks can occur against military members, but the line is blurry. For instance, the Khobar Towers incident is considered a terrorist attack.