Obama’s War on Libya: A Constitutional View

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

I figured you would have to run away at some point. You embarrassed yourself and you don't even know how you did it. :toast

---

You thought you knew what the War Powers Dec contained, and how it applied...glad I could hook you up with some libertarian knowledge.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parker2112

You thought you knew what the War Powers Dec contained, and how it applied...glad I could hook you up with some libertarian knowledge.

---

Do all libertarians try to alter their original statements then claim to be so stupid that they can't understand what they said in the first place?

No wonder you guys do so shitty in every election.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

Do all libertarians try to alter their original statements then claim to be so stupid that they can't understand what they said in the first place?

No wonder you guys do so shitty in every election.

---

For onlookers: Notice Chump cant deny the fact that he didnt even understand the substantive requirements under the language of the WPR.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parker2112

For onlookers: Notice Chump cant deny the fact that he didnt even understand the substantive requirements under the language of the WPR.

---

Because I understood them just fine.

You, on the other hand, tried to omit a most critical qualifier to bolster your argument, then tried to pretend it didn't make any difference.

Nice try.

The funny thing about the War Powers Act of 73 is that no president has ever considered it constitutional, even though they usually at least inform Congress in a manner consistent with its somewhat vague terms. Obama did so in regards to Libya.

Hey Parker, do you remember when Ron Paul introduced articles of impeachment against Ronald Reagan for waging war in Grenada?

Neither do I.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

Because I understood them just fine.

You, on the other hand, tried to omit a most critical qualifier to bolster your argument, then tried to pretend it didn't make any difference.

Nice try.

The funny thing about the War Powers Act of 73 is that no president has ever considered it constitutional, even though they usually at least inform Congress in a manner consistent with its somewhat vague terms. Obama did so in regards to Libya.

---

its only a qualifier if we are under attack or there is imminent threat to our forces.

Again...fail, fail, fail and fail. your point is completely irrelevant, your trying to cloud the issue, and your ego makes it easier for elected officials to get away with illegal shit. congrats :toast

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Parker2112

its only a qualifier if we are under attack or there is imminent threat to our forces.

---

Right. You tried to apply it to the Libya situation. Therein lies your failure. Congress knew what was happening before it happened.

Quote:

---

Again...fail, fail, fail and fail. your point is completely irrelevant, your trying to cloud the issue, and your ego makes it easier for elected officials to get away with illegal shit. congrats :toast

---

Your messiah complex makes it easy for people to make fun of you. Congrats. :toast