-
Re: Players that you would rather have instead of RJ..
Here are two teams based on the best and worst suggestions.
IMO.
B Team
G: Gary Coleman
G: xellos8330
F: Martin Luther King
F: Otis Nixon
C: Bag of Rocks
6th man: Matt Bonner
A Team
G: Dwayne Wade
G: Bruce Bowen
F: Kevin Durant
F: Gerald Wallace
C: Scola (small ball will work OK against Team B)
6th man: Andre Iguodala
-
Re: Players that you would rather have instead of RJ..
If the Spurs did explore trade options for RJ during the offseason, someone that comes to mind is Corey Maggette (who has a similar contract but with 1 year less); I've been reading that he hasn't really worked out with the Bucks.
The trade works: http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMa...radeId=6gqx7vc
-
Re: Players that you would rather have instead of RJ..
-
Re: Players that you would rather have instead of RJ..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
romain.star
steevie wonder
Good choice. I had to update the B Team.
I replaced Otis Nixon with Wonder.
B Team
G: Gary Coleman
G: xellos8330
F: Martin Luther King
F: Stevie Wonder
C: Bag of Rocks
6th man: Matt Bonner
-
Re: Players that you would rather have instead of RJ..
Stephen Jackson - knows the system, can defend Dirk, clutch.
Can't choose Lebron because Pop might not play him as he doesn't know his system.
-
Re: Players that you would rather have instead of RJ..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
20beastie45
danillo gallinari
i kinda like the new thuggets, especially danillo. that team's fun to watch, especially when they're beating the lakers
-
Re: Players that you would rather have instead of RJ..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
wontstartdumbthreads
I think the OP suggesting LeBron James might have been a clue.
I think op wanted to start at the top (lebron), and find out where RJ would be ranked in a superset of all small forwards in the NBA. Where ranking would be decided by the position at which the squabbling was at its loudest.
-
Re: Players that you would rather have instead of RJ..
-
Re: Players that you would rather have instead of RJ..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
anonoftheinternets
I think op wanted to start at the top (lebron), and find out where RJ would be ranked in a superset of all small forwards in the NBA. Where ranking would be decided by the position at which the squabbling was at its loudest.
That would constitue a shocking amount of thought put into a SpursTalk thread. But after looking at it again and some of the OP's other threads, I think you're right.
So I guess the discussion will probably end up somewhere between Otis Nixon and a Bag of Rocks but not drop as far as Matt Bonner.
-
Re: Players that you would rather have instead of RJ..
Kwame Brown and a 16oz pepsi will do
-
Re: Players that you would rather have instead of RJ..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Chachachango
I don't know if he plays the same position as RJ but I would like to have Stephen Jackson. He looks like a mofo with the black Spur uniform.
WINNER!!! :ihit
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NRHector
#12
gave me the chills! :ihit
-
Re: Players that you would rather have instead of RJ..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ace3g
If the Spurs did explore trade options for RJ during the offseason, someone that comes to mind is Corey Maggette (who has a similar contract but with 1 year less); I've been reading that he hasn't really worked out with the Bucks.
The trade works:
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMa...radeId=6gqx7vc
God no.
-
Re: Players that you would rather have instead of RJ..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
wontstartdumbthreads
Good choice. I had to update the B Team.
I replaced Otis Nixon with Wonder.
B Team
G: Gary Coleman
G: xellos8330
F: Martin Luther King
F: Stevie Wonder
C: Bag of Rocks
6th man: Matt Bonner
The bench is weak
-
Re: Players that you would rather have instead of RJ..
Darrell Arthur
Martell Webster
Corey Maggette
Jeff Green
Trevor Ariza
Dorell Wright
Matt Harpring
-
Re: Players that you would rather have instead of RJ..
See, the funny part is that Matt Bonner can't even crack the starting lineup ahead of 2 dead people, a blind man, a SpursTalk poster, and a bag of rocks.
The fact that my post went by mostly unacknowledged means either 1) that it wasn't very funny or 2) that maybe that is the correct assesment of Matt Bonner.
I read my post again and since it is decidedly hilarious, it must mean that Bonner is really not very good.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
wontstartdumbthreads
Good choice. I had to update the B Team.
I replaced Otis Nixon with Wonder.
B Team
G: Gary Coleman
G: xellos8330
F: Martin Luther King
F: Stevie Wonder
C: Bag of Rocks
6th man: Matt Bonner
-
Re: Players that you would rather have instead of RJ..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
wontstartdumbthreads
See, the funny part is that Matt Bonner can't even crack the starting lineup ahead of 2 dead people, a blind man, a SpursTalk poster, and a bag of rocks.
The fact that my post went by mostly unacknowledged means either 1) that it wasn't very funny or 2) that maybe that is the correct assesment of Matt Bonner.
I read my post again and since it is decidedly hilarious, it must mean that Bonner is really not very good.
the bag of rocks is dead?
-
Re: Players that you would rather have instead of RJ..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
romain.star
the bag of rocks is dead?
What???? No, Martin Luther King and Gary Coleman are dead.
I'm sure the poster meant Martin Luther King Jr. But I assumed that either way, all the Martin Luther Kings are dead. Gary Coleman is definitely dead.
-
Re: Players that you would rather have instead of RJ..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
wontstartdumbthreads
What???? No, Martin Luther King and Gary Coleman are dead.
I'm sure the poster meant Martin Luther King Jr. But I assumed that either way, all the Martin Luther Kings are dead. Gary Coleman is definitely dead.
well... That was a very funny joke of mine and i'm actually proud of it
-
Re: Players that you would rather have instead of RJ..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
romain.star
well... That was a very funny joke of mine and i'm actually proud of it
Yes, maybe. I might be missing the subtle nuances of Romanian humor.
-
Re: Players that you would rather have instead of RJ..
Technically, the bag of rocks was never alive.
-
Re: Players that you would rather have instead of RJ..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ohmwrecker
Technically, the bag of rocks was never alive.
Does that preclude something from being dead?
-
Re: Players that you would rather have instead of RJ..
-
Re: Players that you would rather have instead of RJ..
Quote:
Originally Posted by
wontstartdumbthreads
Yes, maybe. I might be missing the subtle nuances of Romanian humor.
you are not the only one, don't worry