I tend to believe you have no idea what you are talking about anyway -- but if those are the actual texts, do the words "but not limited to" mean anything to you?
Printable View
I tend to believe you have no idea what you are talking about anyway -- but if those are the actual texts, do the words "but not limited to" mean anything to you?
Yes, I saw that, but there is no trail to it.Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
Care to show me by chance?
My God. The votes listed don't match roll call 89. There is clearly something fishy.
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s112-1057
It doesn't look to have been any kind of update here, but I don't see any reason to discredit the author in the op.
It's your trail. You showed it to us.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
Yes, I looked it up initially. When it didn't show up after a day, I did some digging, hence my posts today. It was never voted on, the OP is lying about which bill:Quote:
Originally Posted by Blake
Quote:
S.1057
Latest Title: Ethanol Subsidy and Tariff Repeal Act
Sponsor: Sen Coburn, Tom [OK] (introduced 5/24/2011) Cosponsors (None)
Related Bills: H.R.1075, H.R.1188, S.520, S.871
Latest Major Action: 5/25/2011 Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 69.ALL ACTIONS:
5/24/2011:
Introduced in the Senate. Read the first time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under Read the First Time.
5/25/2011:
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 69.
I showed you the OP is wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
Need to stop believing leftist media without verifying.
Meh. If the OP has it wrong, great.....then there's still a chance for repeal.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
Why do you think it's a fishy situation?
Why is the journalist lying?Quote:
Originally Posted by Blake
Why does the bill voted on have a title that doesn't fit the action?
These questions are why.
Nah, as I said, my default is to believe you have no idea what you're babbling about.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
There are plenty of right wing sources in the 800 or so stories that verify what happenedQuote:
Need to stop believing leftist media without verifying.
and verify that you are completely wrong.
Show me.Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
If you are too stupid to look it up yourself, ask a black person to help you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
I know 8 year olds that can out-investigate you using google.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
Pathetic.
lol "my capabilities"
Goddamn, son. The leftists have taken over Fox News!Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011...l-tax-credits/
:lmao
If you say so.Quote:
Originally Posted by TeyshaBlue
I think she is just reporting on what others said.
One article I found called it a "first step." Not elimination.
I have not been able to find where the voted on measure covers what the media is saying. Can you?
If what the articles are saying is true, USA ethanol will be $0.45 more expensive at wholesale and imported ethanol will be $0.54 cheaper...
A bill often fails because of other things it does other than what it is advertised to do.
Assuming it is true, why does he want to favor imported ethanol?
Why do you think you are the only person in the world who knows the "real" story here?Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
I don't. Stop making things up. I asked others how this traces to ethanol, and nobody can show me except other people say so.Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
Hearsay isn't fact. I want to see the text. I already looked, and failed at finding it.
Did you want to see text when you made your conclusions regarding "black culture".
STFU you moron.Quote:
Originally Posted by MannyIsGod
OK, someone at the library of congress must have fucked up. they are linking the wrong information.
Here is the amendment that was voted on yesterday:
S. Amendment 436
It might have passed if it didn't remove the $0.54 tariff on imported ethanol.
someone at the LOC fucked up?Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
sounds fishy to me....
Say what you want. I found the actual amendment, different from the LOC linked material.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blake
k.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
I say you're a nutjob that jumped to a crazy, conspiracy conclusion because of your poor google skillz.
I read where the many Dems supported the bill but objected to some procedures, and that very probably it will be presented, maybe by the Dems, in different form.
Sounds like typically overcomplicated BS, bowing to corporate $$.
kill the subsidy, kill the tariff, period.