man exposes Scientist lying in the text books and gets run off the radio.

Go to the 33:25 of 43:36 Mark

http://www.wabcradio.com/FlashPlayer...817&ID=2274708

You've snapped. :lol

I still had my other point about the Space Station and NASA to make.

I have heard callers take the whole 20 minute segment as long as they can Bash Obama he knew my topic was creating a buzz and he wanted to talk about Mike Vick.

If you listen to the following segments many callers want to react to my call,



http://www.wabcradio.com/FlashPlayer...817&ID=2274709




Isn't that what radio is really all about... getting the public involved so they can have huge ratings so they sell airtime with ads and make a profit, am i missing something here?


That show could have easily blown away WOAI's Live Coast to Coast with Professor Igmo who claims he is an expert on Moth Man and knows why he's here on earth.

But hey..that's just my opinion, something we once had on the radio...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mouse

Go to the 33:25 of 43:36 Mark

http://www.wabcradio.com/FlashPlayer...817&ID=2274708

---

:lmao:lmao:lmao

I can't tell if you were being serious or trolling him but...

:rollin

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mouse

Isn't that what radio is really all about... getting the public involved so they can have huge ratings so they sell airtime with ads and make a profit, am i missing something here?

---

No, the purpose of the caller, is to make the host look good.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Agloco

You've snapped. :lol

---

He's always been lie that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 4>0rings

:lmao:lmao:lmao

I can't tell if you were being serious or trolling him but...

:rollin

---

click on the show links that say Aug 31 and hear the feedback.
http://www.wabcradio.com/sectional.asp?id=37817

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wild Cobra

No, the purpose of the caller, is to make the host look good.

---

Is that why Nbadan will never have his calls heard on Rush Limbaugh?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mouse

Is that why Nbadan will never have his calls heard on Rush Limbaugh?

---

I don't know. Does he waste his time calling in? Ever actually get a ring-ring, or is it always busy like thousands of other callers get each day?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mouse

But hey..that's just my opinion, something we once had on the radio...

---

You should have hit him with your "Michael Jackson is alive" theory as well. You might have induced an on air suicide.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mouse

Go to the 33:25 of 43:36 Mark

http://www.wabcradio.com/FlashPlayer...817&ID=2274708

---

Oh boy. another link to a long video/audio track from someone who won't listen/watch anything anybody else posts.

Please post more.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mouse

Go to the 33:25 of 43:36 Mark

http://www.wabcradio.com/FlashPlayer...817&ID=2274708

---

Self proclaimed troll god status aside, you love yourself more than anyone I've ever encountered. You must score a ton of pussy.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DMC

Self proclaimed troll god status aside, you love yourself more than anyone I've ever encountered. You must score a ton of pussy.

---

Success of a man is not based on how much pussy he gets.

Sincerely:

http://jewishsinglemaltwhiskysociety...johnHolmes.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Agloco

You should have hit him with your "Michael Jackson is alive" theory as well. You might have induced an on air suicide.

---

Proving the Grand Canyon is not two million years old like you and your yuppy radiation pals think it is I find much more satisfying.

I already posted at the mans Facebook page he knows what to expect next time I call in.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mouse

Proving the Grand Canyon is not two million years old like you and your yuppy radiation pals think it is I find much more satisfying.

I already posted at the mans Facebook page he knows what to expect next time I call in.

---

You fail to understand that water doesn't do much damage when it's not under pressure. The water for the concrete tunnel was under tremendous pressure.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RandomGuy

Oh boy. another link to a long video/audio track from someone who won't listen/watch anything anybody else posts.

Please post more.

---

Maybe one day when you grow a pair and call in a live radio show you can post the audio also.

Grand Canyon not as old as recently claimed


http://arizonageology.blogspot.com/2...-recently.html

Geologists Phil Pearthree and Jon Spencer from AZGS, and Jim Faulds and Kyle House from the Nevada Bureau of Mines are challenging a recent report that claimed the Grand Canyon started forming 17 million years ago. [right, National Park Service]

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mouse

Maybe one day when you grow a pair and call in a live radio show you can post the audio also.

Grand Canyon not as old as recently claimed


http://arizonageology.blogspot.com/2...-recently.html

Geologists Phil Pearthree and Jon Spencer from AZGS, and Jim Faulds and Kyle House from the Nevada Bureau of Mines are challenging a recent report that claimed the Grand Canyon started forming 17 million years ago. [right, National Park Service]

---

That's still way more than the 60 days to make it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wild Cobra

You fail to understand that water doesn't do much damage when it's not under pressure. The water for the concrete tunnel was under tremendous pressure.

---

You fail to understand the Grand canyon was a result of a spillover. That is water building up pressure then released all at once.



damage Irene just one day of rain


http://www.buffalonews.com/incoming/...w620/Irene.jpg

http://a57.foxnews.com/static/manage...ont_damage.jpg

Just think what 40 days and nights of rain can do...


http://www.stardusttrailers.com/gall...terworld_4.jpg

Make a shitty movie?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wild Cobra

That's still way more than the 60 days to make it.

---

So If I say 3,998 people died on 9/11 and you say 3,997 people died on 9/11 does that mean we have to stop giving our personal views on 9/11?

The point is the Grand Canyon could have been carved in two years it's still 16 million 998.000 years less than your Darwin lovers claim.

You obliviously have no clue how powerful water is and what it can do in just hours.


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/...08_634x474.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 4>0rings

Make a shitty movie?

---

Only the people who paid 8 dollars to go see water world were pissed,
the people like myself that downloaded it for free thought it was alright.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mouse

Proving the Grand Canyon is not two million years old like you and your yuppy radiation pals think it is I find much more satisfying.

---

Does this mean you have time to lecture me about the inaccuracies of carbon dating?

Why hasn't the Mississippi River then created another Grand Canyon?

http://www.nypress.com/imgs/hed/art20239.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Agloco

Does this mean you have time to lecture me about the inaccuracies of carbon dating?

---

Your move brah!

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...use/chump2.jpg


Two known facts:

A: I don't lecture people, I try to educate them.

B: I don't want to waste time educating the ignorant.

Don't go were you may want to come the same..........


http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...len-Blue-2.gif

:lmao

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by fraga

http://www.nypress.com/imgs/hed/art20239.jpg

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mouse

Your move brah!

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...use/chump2.jpg


Two known facts:

A: I don't lecture people, I try to educate them.

B: I don't want to waste time educating the ignorant.

Don't go were you may want to come the same..........


http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...len-Blue-2.gif

---

I eagerly await your sermon.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mouse

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...len-Blue-2.gif

---

Honestly though mouse, this is a cool picture. Did you know that cesium137 emits a bluish glow?

Hey, that reminds me.........have you ever been to Brazil?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goi%C3%A2nia_accident

Quote:

---

A few days later one man broke open the iridium window which allowed him to see the caesium chloride emitting a deep blue light.[1]

The exact mechanism by which the light was generated was not known at the time the IAEA report was written. The light is thought to be either fluorescence or Cherenkov radiation associated with the absorption of moisture by the source; similar blue light was observed in 1988 at Oak Ridge National Laboratory during the disencapsulation of a 137Cs source. The man scooped out some of the radioactive caesium and tried to light it, thinking it was gunpowder, and eventually gave up.

---

You weren't a part of that were you?

...

That was one of the dumbest things I have ever heard in my life.

Still can't believe how retarded that was.

BTW mouse they do know how Stone Henge was built.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Vici

Still can't believe how retarded that was.

BTW mouse they do know how Stone Henge was built.

---

http://www.thebeachmonkeys.com/stone...op_681x428.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ElNono

http://www.thebeachmonkeys.com/stone...op_681x428.jpg

---

:lol

Mouse reminds me of this onion article:

http://www.theonion.com/articles/som...problem,11018/

This is one of the most stupidest threads ever in this forum's history.

Theses men received the same ignorant responses I am getting before they're simpleminded non believing asses were educated to their causes.

http://sln.fi.edu/franklin/inventor/images/belllg.jpg


http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-d58jtcy0v8...ulb-moment.jpg


http://scrapetv.com/News/News%20Page...soft-young.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mouse

Just think what 40 days and nights of rain can do...


http://www.stardusttrailers.com/gall...terworld_4.jpg

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 4>0rings

Make a shitty movie?

---

:rollin

DING DING DING...

4>0rings = Thread winner.

All you other slim shady's is just imitatin'

/thread

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mouse

Theses men received the same ignorant responses I am getting before they're simpleminded non believing asses were educated to their causes.

---

1) THEIR, not "they're"

2) The sentence is structured so that "simpleminded non-believing asses" refers to "Theses men", i.e. the great inventors. I assume that is not what you intended.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mouse

the Grand Canyon could have been carved in two years it's still 16 million 998.000 years less than your Darwin lovers claim.

You obliviously have no clue how powerful water is and what it can do in just hours.


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/...08_634x474.jpg

---

:rolleyes

Uh huh.

Quote:

---

Response:
1.We know what to expect of a sudden massive flood, namely:
•a wide, relatively shallow bed, not a deep, sinuous river channel.
•anastamosing channels (i.e., a braided river system), not a single, well-developed channel.
•coarse-grained sediments, including boulders and gravel, on the floor of the canyon.
•streamlined relict islands.

The Scablands in Washington state were produced by such a flood and show such features (Allen et al. 1986; Baker 1978; Bretz 1969; Waitt 1985). Such features are also seen on Mars at Kasei Vallis and Ares Vallis (Baker 1978; NASA Quest n.d.). They do not appear in the Grand Canyon. Compare relief maps of the two areas to see for yourself.


2.The same flood that was supposed to carve the Grand Canyon was also supposed to lay down the miles of sediment (and a few lava flows) from which the canyon is carved. A single flood cannot do both. Creationists claim that the year of the Flood included several geological events, but that still stretches credulity.


3.The Grand Canyon contains some major meanders. Upstream of the Grand Canyon, the San Juan River (around Gooseneck State Park, southeast Utah) has some of the most extreme meandering imaginable. The canyon is 1,000 feet high, with the river flowing five miles while progressing one mile as the crow flies (American Southwest n.d.). There is no way a single massive flood could carve this.


4.Recent flood sediments would be unconsolidated. If the Grand Canyon were carved in unconsolidated sediments, the sides of the canyon would show obvious slumping.


5.The inner canyon is carved into the strongly metamorphosed sediments of the Vishnu Group, which are separated by an angular unconformity from the overlying sedimentary rocks, and also in the Zoroaster Granite, which intrudes the Vishnu Group. These rocks, by all accounts, would have been quite hard before the Flood began.


6.Along the Grand Canyon are tributaries, which are as deep as the Grand Canyon itself. These tributaries are roughly perpendicular to the main canyon. A sudden massive flood would not produce such a pattern.


7.Sediment from the Colorado River has been shifted northward over the years by movement along the San Andreas and related faults (Winker and Kidwell 1986). Such movement of the delta sediment would not occur if the canyon were carved as a single event.


8.The lakes that Austin proposed as the source for the carving floodwaters are not large compared with the Grand Canyon itself. The flood would have to remove more material than the floodwaters themselves.


9.If a brief interlude of rushing water produced the Grand Canyon, there should be many more such canyons. Why are there not other grand canyons surrounding all the margins of all continents?


10.There is a perfectly satisfactory gradual explanation for the formation of the Grand Canyon that avoids all these problems. Sediments deposited about two billion years ago were metamorphosed and intruded by granite to become today's basement layers. Other sediments were deposited in the late Proterozoic and were subsequently folded, faulted, and eroded. More sediments were deposited in the Paleozoic and Mesozoic, with a period of erosion in between. The Colorado Plateau started rising gradually about seventy million years ago. As it rose, existing rivers deepened, carving through the previous sediments (Harris and Kiver 1985, 273-282).

---

Note:

Darwin was not a geologist.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RandomGuy

Note:

Darwin was not a geologist.

---

We all know Darwin wasn't worth a shit. Some old hash smoking drunk finds a few birds on an island that look the same with different beaks then writes a book about how we evolved from snails and you simpleminded fools cling on his words like Joe Chalupa at an Obama rally.


It pains me to even have to educate some of you people to a level where I can try to debate properly.

Scientist all over the world are admitting they was wrong about the earth being Billions of years old, to bad many of them (out of fear) won't go on the record.

I suggest you don't miss my next call it will blow the host and listeners away.

The gloves are coming off now.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mouse

we evolved from snails

---

Someone who doesn't even know what a theory is, trying to debunk it.

:lol

That's comedy right there.

If you can't clearly state what the theory of evolution says in your own words, you have zero credibility when it comes to criticizing it, sorry.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RandomGuy

Someone who doesn't even know what a theory is, trying to debunk it.

:lol

That's comedy right there.

If you can't clearly state what the theory of evolution says in your own words, you have zero credibility when it comes to criticizing it, sorry.

---

I knew that would go over your small brain.

allow me to educate you.....

Evolution teaches us the Earth was 4 billion years old it took two billion years for it to cool down during that time there were huge pools of liquid that life started to form and millions of years later that life slithered out from the pools and grew legs.

what part of evolving from a Snail do you not get?



http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...eMouse/aa8.jpg

Evolution is your religion why not take the time to study it?

turn on your AM radio.............

No thanks.

Maybe being a Darwin supporter you find a banana more appealing?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mouse

Maybe being a Darwin supporter you find a banana more appealing?

---

Mouse pushing radioactive foods here?

:lol

as promised....


17:22 / 42:40

http://www.wabcradio.com/FlashPlayer...817&ID=2297308

mouse,
i believe in creation. However, i do not believe each creative "day" was 6,000 years. "Day" can be a relative term. I do believe the earth could have been formed billions of years ago and God put life on it in a relatively shorter recent time as laid out in Genesis, which as you know is supported by science.

Can you agree with that?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mouse

I knew that would go over your small brain.

allow me to educate you.....

Evolution teaches us the Earth was 4 billion years old it took two billion years for it to cool down during that time there were huge pools of liquid that life started to form and millions of years later that life slithered out from the pools and grew legs.

what part of evolving from a Snail do you not get?



http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...eMouse/aa8.jpg

Evolution is your religion why not take the time to study it?

---

LMAO!!!!!!!!!!! Where did you get snail from? So from that I'm guessing that all life evolved from a snail, then (somehow going back to being aquatic), then a fog, then regressing again to an alligator, then a platypus?, then regressing again to a bird, then monkey, finally a human?

Jesus Christ you didn't go to school very long did you?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Vici

LMAO!!!!!!!!!!! Where did you get snail from?

---

Science text books

Quote:

---

So from that I'm guessing that all life evolved from a snail,

---

Read any 7th grade science book.

Quote:

---

then (somehow going back to being aquatic), then a fog, then regressing again to an alligator, then a platypus?, then regressing again to a bird, then monkey, finally a human?

---

I knew you would get it!

Quote:

---

Jesus Christ you didn't go to school very long did you?

---

What school would you recommend?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mouse

What school would you recommend?

---

a college, tbh

Bill Gates used to look like Tony Hawk.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mouse

Science text books





Read any 7th grade science book.






I knew you would get it!






What school would you recommend?

---

Funny, Bachelors of Science in Human Biology degree must be worthless since not a single book or journal mentioned mammals, much less humans, evolved from snails.

Give one source, even if the guy is insane and not a scientist, that mentions life came from a snail. It's more for entertainment on my part :lmao

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Blake

a college, tbh

---

I was thinking he should just finish his G.E.D. but why not shoot for the stars.

lol mouse trollin good job

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mouse

what part of evolving from a Snail do you not get?



http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...eMouse/aa8.jpg

---

lol you don't know how arrows in a picture work

Quote:

---

Evolution is your religion why not take the time to study it?

---

Michael Denton did. He now believes in evolution by design.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Vici

Funny, Bachelors of Science in Human Biology degree must be worthless since not a single book or journal mentioned mammals, much less humans, evolved from snails.

Give one source, even if the guy is insane and not a scientist, that mentions life came from a snail. It's more for entertainment on my part :lmao

---

I've schooled mouse on this already.

He knows it is wrong, but still uses the statement in his trolling. Or maybe hell, he forgot getting spanked. mouse is not one with a great short-term memory, no offense, m.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mouse

I knew that would go over your small brain.

allow me to educate you.....

Evolution teaches us the Earth was 4 billion years old it took two billion years for it to cool down during that time there were huge pools of liquid that life started to form and millions of years later that life slithered out from the pools and grew legs.

Evolution is your religion why not take the time to study it?

---

Also, "evolution" does not teach us that the earth is 4 billion years old.

That is physics, and chemistry, not "evolution". The fact that the earth is that old, does support the theory, however.

It was also billions of years after life first formed that the first multicelled animals evolved the ability to live on land, approx 2.5bn years.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RandomGuy

Also, "evolution" does not teach us that the earth is 4 billion years old.

That is physics, and chemistry, not "evolution". The fact that the earth is that old, does support the theory, however.

It was also billions of years after life first formed that the first multicelled animals evolved the ability to live on land, approx 2.5bn years.

---

Apparently the world was covered in snails at some point.

Mouse is a dangerously insane individual.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LnGrrrR

Mouse is a dangerously insane individual.

---

:lmao

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mouse

What school would you recommend?

---

Well from the looks of it, not MIT.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Vici

Funny, Bachelors of Science in Human Biology degree must be worthless since not a single book or journal mentioned mammals, much less humans, evolved from snails.

---

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3427/...1f397f2129.jpg

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...eMouse/aa7.jpg

Do you even know how snails came about?

Do you know anything about what the text books teach?

The books in school teach the earth took billions of years to cool down and out of the pools of liquid life was formed.

From that life snails evolved and later on man evolved, what part of man evolved from a snail do you and the other igmo's in this topic do not get?

Quote:

---

Give one source, even if the guy is insane and not a scientist, that mentions life came from a snail. It's more for entertainment on my part :lmao

---

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...eMouse/aa6.jpg
http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...Mouse/book.jpg


http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...lutiontree.gif
http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...ouse/book6.jpg

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...ouse/snail.jpg

Look at the tree picture you posted.

A snail is in the mollusk family.

Lol

Look at the tree picture you posted.

A snail is in the mollusk family.

Lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mouse

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3427/...1f397f2129.jpg

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...eMouse/aa7.jpg

Do you even know how snails came about?

Do you know anything about what the text books teach?

The books in school teach the earth took billions of years to cool down and out of the pools of liquid life was formed.

From that life snails evolved and later on man evolved, what part of man evolved from a snail do you and the other igmo's in this topic do not get?




http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...eMouse/aa6.jpg
http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...Mouse/book.jpg


http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...lutiontree.gif
http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...ouse/book6.jpg

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...ouse/snail.jpg

---

You could've just said, "No, I can't find anyone who says that life originated from snails".

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Blake

Look at the tree picture you posted.

A snail is in the mollusk family.

Lol

---

That's right cherry pick some typo instead of addressing the subject matter.

You guys are out of your league on this subject stick to debating sports.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mouse

what part of man evolved from a snail do you and the other igmo's in this topic do not get?

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...ouse/snail.jpg

---

:lmao

Snails and humans have a common ancestor, but the very picture you posted shows that you are wrong.

You have, in essence, a family tree, and are saying that my 2nd cousin is my grandfather.

:rollin

You don't even understand the theory you are attempting to troll. That is funny.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mouse

That's right cherry pick some typo instead of addressing the subject matter.

You guys are out of your league on this subject stick to debating sports.

---

lol typo

5th grade science book pictures are obviously out of your league

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mouse

what part of man evolved from a snail do you and the other igmo's in this topic do not get?

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...ouse/snail.jpg

---

what part of I am the grandson of my cousin vinny do you and the other igmo's in this topic do not get?

http://spurstalk.com/forums/picture....pictureid=1642

See? I have this family tree with us both on it. That obviously proves Cousin Vinny is my grandfather.

:lol

Ralph named his boys Vinny and Guido?

did Ralph have mob ties?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RandomGuy

:lmao

Snails and humans have a common ancestor, but the very picture you posted shows that you are wrong.

You have, in essence, a family tree, and are saying that my 2nd cousin is my grandfather.

:rollin

You don't even understand the theory you are attempting to troll. That is funny.

---

Maybe a simpler explanation is necessary.......


Lets say a loft of bread came before the Cresent, they still are made from flour.

If life started in a warm pool of liquid what part of snail and man do you not get?

keyword (flour)


please don't make me have to simplify it any further.

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p.../oos-books.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Blake

5th grade science book pictures are obviously out of your league

---

So you care nothing about children in the 5th grade?

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...ide3_main_.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RandomGuy

what part of I am the grandson of my cousin vinny do you and the other igmo's in this topic do not get?

http://spurstalk.com/forums/picture....pictureid=1642

See? I have this family tree with us both on it. That obviously proves Cousin Vinny is my grandfather.

---

I knew you would make the connection. I know this new shit is hard for some of you to take in. Baby steps....don't overwhelm your brains.

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...eMouse/aa2.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Blake

:lol

Ralph named his boys Vinny and Guido?

did Ralph have mob ties?

---

He only wore turtle necks.

Ralph Lauren

http://www.seventeen.com/cm/cosmogir...hLauren-de.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RandomGuy

Also, "evolution" does not teach us that the earth is 4 billion years old.

That is physics, and chemistry, not "evolution". The fact that the earth is that old, does support the theory, however.

It was also billions of years after life first formed that the first multicelled animals evolved the ability to live on land, approx 2.5bn years.

---

And your evidence is from where?

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...22222222-1.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mouse

And your evidence is from where?

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...22222222-1.jpg

---

Why is there a quote from the "Financial Times" on the cover of that book?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mouse

And your evidence is from where?

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...22222222-1.jpg

---

Snails mouse? Got into a dime bag full of hocus pocus again?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Agloco

Snails mouse? Got into a dime bag full of hocus pocus again?

---

I knew the snail metaphor would go right over your head.

go back a page I explain it for the slow thinkers.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Blake

Why is there a quote from the "Financial Times" on the cover of that book?

---

Check with the book publisher.


Another book found in the classrooms.
http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...eMouse/555.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mouse

I knew the snail metaphor would go right over your head.

go back a page I explain it for the slow thinkers.

---

Slow thinker? Been a while since I held that distinction.

Thanks for the kudos mouse.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RandomGuy

Also, "evolution" does not teach us that the earth is 4 billion years old.

That is physics, and chemistry, not "evolution". The fact that the earth is that old, does support the theory, however.

It was also billions of years after life first formed that the first multicelled animals evolved the ability to live on land, approx 2.5bn years.

---

Geology is what I think you are looking for and the creationists have hated on James Hutton's Theory of the Earth too.

I'm guessing you haven't read a page from any of those books.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mouse

go back a page I explain it for the slow thinkers.

---

only a slow thinker would not recognize that mouse is the resident slow thinker

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Agloco

Slow thinker? Been a while since I held that distinction.

Thanks for the kudos mouse.

---

Your the one who who told posters in the Club your not educated.

I am just trying to support your theory.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Blake

only a slow thinker would not recognize that mouse is the resident slow thinker

---

How slow do you have to think to wait till page #2 to realize it?

I suggest you guys do some Research....errr......I mean ...Googling. before you debate this topic. (just heads up)

http://www.wabcradio.com/FlashPlayer...817&ID=2297308


know when you've been licked...


http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p.../sour-puss.gif

The cover up


10:40 of 48:48

http://www.wabcradio.com/FlashPlayer...817&ID=2274709

I love when a debate topic is on page two and I was the last to post in it.

You bitches better do your homework before you debate me on age of earth or Evolution.

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...c14Mollusk.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mouse

I love when a debate topic is on page two and I was the last to post in it.

You bitches better do your homework before you debate me on age of earth or Evolution.

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...c14Mollusk.jpg

---

No offense, but it's a bit of a stretch to pretend to scientific credibility in the same breath that you brag about how awesome it is being a night watchman who rocks his shift on Netflix. At least you could say you spend your time reading.

But you don't.

Have there been any follow-up calls to the show? You didn't really make any valid points in the first one although it was a great balancing act between so called facts and comedy.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by admiralsnackbar

No offense, but it's a bit of a stretch to pretend to scientific credibility in the same breath that you brag about how awesome it is being a night watchman who rocks his shift on Netflix. At least you could say you spend your time reading.

But you don't.

---

Pardon the outdated graphics and book links.

I have a full time job, post in over 24 different forums, have 4 documentaries I need to complete by 2013... and have pet rabbit that chewed the power cord to my 9300 dell laptop?


Don't resort to trying to insulting me to gain debate points... prove me wrong.



http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...dy2006-fig.gif

pull out the Ice Core card so I can bend you over

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mouse

I love when a debate topic is on page two and I was the last to post in it.

You bitches better do your homework before you debate me on age of earth or Evolution.

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...c14Mollusk.jpg

---

It means that the apathy towards the junk you post is becoming more pervasive. This is a good thing imo.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mouse

How slow do you have to think to wait till page #2 to realize it?

---

I dunno. What's the standard time that someone should figure out that you are the resident slow thinker?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by admiralsnackbar

No offense, but....

---

That could ruin your credibility to say you don't want to offend me and yet you do anyway. (heads up) you could look like a flip flopper or some one you can't trust.
And I don't mean that in an offensive way.

[quote] it's a bit of a stretch[/quote

Telling students they evolved from an ape and not having any proof is more of a stretch. You trying to urinate in the men's room and actually get in in the urinal and not on your pay less shoes for the first time, is more of a stretch.. (you see how the lame smack doesn't work in debate topics?)

Quote:

---

to pretend to scientific credibility in the same breath that you brag about how awesome it is being a night watchman who rocks his shift on Netflix.

---

Perhaps your misinformed mate... This isn't my first age of earth or Evolution debate. I can do this shit playing XBox 360 God of War on my chicks ass while we 69ing each other.

Just post some facts and move on this is no place for wannabee smack talkers.

Quote:

---

At least you could say you spend your time reading.

But you don't.

---

How many times do you read a book you have read already. It;s not my fault I all ready did the research it's your lame ass fault for coming in a debate unprepared and resorting to Spurs Report style of posting.

This may be the easiest debate i ever participated in. You guys are some ignorant well educated people. You don't even understand the Snail theory and its from your master Darwin himself.

Scientist today back the snail theory. I didn't make this shit up. Do I need to explain for a 3rd time?


http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...e/66666666.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Agloco

It means that the apathy towards the junk you post is becoming more pervasive. This is a good thing imo.

---

And what have you posted? Mr. (look at me I'm educated)

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...use/555555.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Blake

I dunno. What's the standard time that someone should figure out that you are the resident slow thinker?

---

Well according to your Big Bang scientists you support how about 4 Billion years?

http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p...nap-258480.png

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mouse

And what have you posted?

---

I'm quite certain that my input here far outweighs any contributions you've made.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mouse

Mr. (look at me I'm educated)

---

Would it make you feel better if I told you I held a GED instead?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mouse

Telling students they evolved from an ape and not having any proof is more of a stretch. You trying to urinate in the men's room and actually get in in the urinal and not on your pay less shoes for the first time, is more of a stretch.. (you see how the lame smack doesn't work in debate topics?)

---

The only "debate" is the one occurring in your head. This isn't a debate mouse, this is a joke.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mouse

Telling students they evolved from an ape and not having any proof is more of a stretch.

---

lol escargot

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mouse

Well according to your Big Bang scientists you support how about 4 Billion years?

---

So figuring out you are the resident slow thinker by page #2 is actually incredibly fast.

I'm betting most posters figure it out even faster than that.