Re: Christian fourth grade textbook, tries to explain electricity but just gives up
LMAO so this is why so many Americans don't know how to think logically.
09-22-2011
Blake
Re: Christian fourth grade textbook, tries to explain electricity but just gives up
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wild Cobra
Just did some preliminary checking. That has not been in print since 1990. They found problems with it and altered what they said to kids.
Good catch, WC.
09-22-2011
101A
Re: Christian fourth grade textbook, tries to explain electricity but just gives up
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoK
That's an awesome counter argument!
Statement != Argument
09-22-2011
Hooks
Re: Christian fourth grade textbook, tries to explain electricity but just gives up
I need Mouse's input on this.
09-22-2011
ALVAREZ6
Re: Christian fourth grade textbook, tries to explain electricity but just gives up
Where does wind come from????????
09-22-2011
ALVAREZ6
Re: Christian fourth grade textbook, tries to explain electricity but just gives up
09-23-2011
DUNCANownsKOBE
Re: Christian fourth grade textbook, tries to explain electricity but just gives up
Quote:
Originally Posted by 101A
Statement != Argument
So you're not denying the fact that atheists are right :lol
09-23-2011
Blake
Re: Christian fourth grade textbook, tries to explain electricity but just gives up
Quote:
Originally Posted by 101A
That's OK - I don't like self-righteous, condescending atheists.
That's ok as long as religion stays out of public school science books.
09-23-2011
boutons_deux
Re: Christian fourth grade textbook, tries to explain electricity but just gives up
"I don't like self-righteous, condescending atheists."
but you love self-righteous, smarmy, smug, doubt-less, self-congratulating "Christians" ?
09-23-2011
101A
Re: Christian fourth grade textbook, tries to explain electricity but just gives up
Quote:
Originally Posted by boutons_deux
"I don't like self-righteous, condescending atheists."
but you love self-righteous, smarmy, smug, doubt-less, self-congratulating "Christians" ?
Don't like them either. Probably less.
09-23-2011
DUNCANownsKOBE
Re: Christian fourth grade textbook, tries to explain electricity but just gives up
But you like their textbooks :lmao
09-23-2011
Drachen
Re: Christian fourth grade textbook, tries to explain electricity but just gives up
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoK
But you like their textbooks :lmao
I missed where he said he supported their textbooks, where was that again?
09-24-2011
DarkReign
Re: Christian fourth grade textbook, tries to explain electricity but just gives up
Quote:
Originally Posted by ALVAREZ6
LOL "Cant explain the tides"
Hello Physical Science 101.
09-27-2011
Nbadan
Re: Christian fourth grade textbook, tries to explain electricity but just gives up
Why Evangelicals Are Fooled Into Accepting Pseudoscience
Quote:
So why have evangelicals been so ready to reject the generally accepted conclusions of the scientific community on global warming?
I want to suggest that the reason has nothing to do with climate science per se, but derives from the generally dim view that many evangelicals have of science and scientists -- views that make it hard to distinguish credible science from fake challengers.
One of the strategies employed most effectively by evangelicals in their crusade against evolution, which does pose real, although soluble, biblical and theological problems, has been to undermine the entire scientific enterprise. If science is a deeply flawed, ideologically driven, philosophically suspect enterprise, then why should anyone care if almost every scientist supports the theory of evolution? If the scientific community is just a bunch of self-serving ideologues with Ivy League appointments, then we can ignore anything it says that we don't like.
This widespread anti-science attitude was on display in all its glory in a recent polemic from the Discovery Institute, the Seattle-based think tank that promotes intelligent design. In a piece titled "Peer Review and the Corruption of Science" the author reports on a column in the Guardian by a respected British scientist titled "Publish-or-perish: Peer review and the corruption of science." The Guardian piece makes the legitimate point that too much weight is placed on the number of publications produced by research scientists rather than their quality. This legitimate concern should generate some thoughtful discussion in the scientific community.
But why would the Discovery Institute feel the need to bring this in-house discussion of the publishing culture of the scientific community to the attention of their largely evangelical readership, a readership that, for the most part, probably couldn't even give the name of a peer-reviewed journal? The goal, clearly, is to take the luster off the phrase "peer-reviewed" -- to undermine claims like "There are no articles in peer-reviewed journals suggesting that Intelligent Design is a viable alternative to evolution."
...
Quote:
The relentless assaults on the integrity of science by groups like the Discovery Institute have made it impossible for many people to understand the significance of a "scientific consensus." If the members of the National Academy of Sciences are just another political group with their own agenda -- left-wing Tea Partiers with Ph.Ds -- we are under no obligation to take them seriously. We can even compare ourselves to Galileo for opposing them, as Rick Perry did in explaining why he rejected the scientific consensus on climate change.
