lol extrapolating geographical trends from ten years worth of data
Printable View
lol extrapolating geographical trends from ten years worth of data
Supposing your graph represents what you think it does, it's like saying a one day cold snap represents a reversal of trend.
Look at your graph, it shows an increase in average temperature every year for the whole period shown.Quote:
Originally Posted by DarrinS
He is also understanding the graph wrong. He posted proof to the contrary of his argument.Quote:
Originally Posted by Winehole23
Darrin still doesn't seem to get that, so I made it simpler. Even if his interpretation were correct, his position would still be absurd.
Really? A decade is only as significant as a single cold spell? I disagree.Quote:
Originally Posted by Winehole23
ok.
That's not even true for the first graph. Temps were declining for 30 years from the mid 1940s to 1970s.Quote:
Originally Posted by Drachen
:lolQuote:
Originally Posted by DarrinS
Each electron has a probability to absorb a photon. The structure of an atom effects that probability. If you have more then it makes sense that they would additive, the problem is they cannot quantify what the effects really are. We don't know for certain what the 'effect' is.Quote:
Originally Posted by TeyshaBlue
:lol :lol :lolQuote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_cooling
Quote:
Global cooling was a conjecture during the 1970s of imminent cooling of the Earth's surface and atmosphere along with a posited commencement of glaciation. This hypothesis had mixed support in the scientific community, but gained temporary popular attention due to a combination of a slight downward trend of temperatures from the 1940s to the early 1970s...
:lolQuote:
Originally Posted by DarrinS
Really? I thought it was all settled.Quote:
Originally Posted by FuzzyLumpkins
I was talking about the second graph. You know, the one that purports that warming has stopped. The first graph shows a pretty solid upward trend that even you should be able to see.Quote:
Originally Posted by DarrinS
Yes, the second graph shows no upward trend. I agree that the first one does.Quote:
Originally Posted by Drachen
Apparently, you don't understand what the graph means.Quote:
Originally Posted by Drachen
what was the percentage of human produced carbon in the atmosphere at the time Darrin. I will wait.Quote:
Originally Posted by DarrinS
Um, all of the data points on the second graph are above the average which indicates a rising temperature, If that is a rolling average it indicates an exponentially rising temperature.Quote:
Originally Posted by DarrinS
Google Keeling curve. Happy reading.Quote:
Originally Posted by Drachen
No some months were hotter and some months were colder during that time period. You are pretty dumb. Its like a graph of velocity compared to a plot of displacement. If I speed up and slow down over an interval, i could end up anywhere along the displacement curve. You need more specific analysis.Quote:
Originally Posted by DarrinS
What you can trend specifically is if ALL of the velocity plots are positive then you can say with certainty that the position vector will be positive.
You took physics right? Its very basic shit. No wonder you needed to learn JAVA.
:lmaoQuote:
Originally Posted by Drachen
Will you believe you're wrong if RG and Manny correct you?
:lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by FuzzyLumpkins
:lmao
Not you too? All temps are relative to 1950-1980 average (which is pretty arbitrary). It just establishes a baseline. Yes, 2001-2011 are hotter than this baseline, but the are not increasing.Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
Neither of them need to correct me. I turned my head sideways and read the vertical words on the left. I will say that while temperatures are clearly above average, this graph shows that over the last ten years, they have indeed leveled off. (i.e., this is not a rolling average.)Quote:
Originally Posted by DarrinS