Biggest jump ever seen in global warming gases

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Drachen

Oh, I know what it means and its etymology, its just that I'll bet that it has been used on this board over the last week (by you) more than it has been used the rest of the time spurstalk has been in existence. Not attacking you, that was the source of my "thesaurus time" comment.

eh, just an observation.

---

It has a very important meaning to me. I love to argue --obviously-- but I argue with the idea that it will lead to the revealing of the truth for the betterment of all.

To me there is nothing worse for finding the truth than those that intentionally mislead. I term them sophists perhaps for lack of a better word. Sorry if I overuse it but to me it gets directly to the core of my contempt.

Darrin clearly can not be trusted.

None of these graphs matter. Manny, Random, And Darrin are all using confirmation bias to prove their side.

In the end, even the IPCC has stated that human beings only accomplish 4 percent of total green house gases.

So as part of the Ole ST bag of tricks.

4 Percent FAGGOTS!!!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FuzzyLumpkins

It has a very important meaning to me. I love to argue --obviously-- but I argue with the idea that it will lead to the revealing of the truth for the betterment of all.

To me there is nothing worse for finding the truth than those that intentionally mislead. I term them sophists perhaps for lack of a better word. Sorry if I overuse it but to me it gets directly to the core of my contempt.

Darrin clearly can not be trusted.

---

That is cool. I guess it's just not one of those words you hear every day and so when someone uses it with some regularity it seems out of the ordinary. Anyway back to the thread.... I think i am going to respond to Igniotgnt's (sp?) post by stealing from a post that RG posted. Watch.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ignignokt

None of these graphs matter. Manny, Random, And Darrin are all using confirmation bias to prove their side.

In the end, even the IPCC has stated that human beings only accomplish 4 percent of total green house gases.

So as part of the Ole ST bag of tricks.

4 Percent FAGGOTS!!!!

---

So then if I gave you a glass of water which contained ONLY 3.9% plutonium, then you would have no problem drinking it since it seems your argument is that this amount could have no way of being harmful.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Drachen

So then if I gave you a glass of water which contained ONLY 3.9% plutonium, then you would have no problem drinking it since it seems your argument is that this amount could have no way of being harmful.

---

You really going with that comparison again?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DarrinS

You really going with that comparison again?

---

It only takes one exeption to disprove which the comparison does very clearly.

I do not think the 4% number is worth very much without context but even without that 4 out of 100 can have a very profound effect on a system. Think back to controls.

First video I posted in this thread puts things in perspective.

You guys can continue to be afraid of plant food. I remain unimpressed.

Light bulb.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DarrinS

First video I posted in this thread puts things in perspective.

---

If you're stupid and easily misled by those with no interest in the truth then I suppose that would be the case. You know your sources are so shitty that you lie about them.

That should be enough to tell any reasonable person what your thoughts on the matter are worth.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FuzzyLumpkins

You ever going to link the study that you pulled the graph from? This may come as s surprise to you but no one other than WC takes you at your word here. So you can circle jerk with him or justify a single thing you say.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DarrinS

Berkeley


Earth


Surface


Temperature


If you weren't so busy having tantrums, you'd notice the answers to several of your questions were easily gleaned from info on the graphs.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wild Cobra

Scientist who said climate change sceptics had been proved wrong accused of hiding truth by colleague

---

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencete...colleague.html

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The actual source of Darrin's graph

But a report to be published today by the Global Warming Policy Foundation includes a graph of world average temperatures over the past ten years, drawn from the BEST project’s data and revealed on its website.

---

Thanks Darrin for showing us all the extent --or lack thereof-- of your character.

I have downloaded BEST's data and source code and I can replicate that graph.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Drachen

So then if I gave you a glass of water which contained ONLY 3.9% plutonium, then you would have no problem drinking it since it seems your argument is that this amount could have no way of being harmful.

---

That would be different.

It's more like, you think you're the enligthened one because you think drinking the Koolaid with 4 percent less cyanide is prudent.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ChumpDumper

Light bulb.

---

Penis pump

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DarrinS

I have downloaded BEST's data and source code and I can replicate that graph.

---

Excuse me if i don't hold my breath.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DarrinS

Penis pump

---

What does that mean?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ignignokt

That would be different.

It's more like, you think you're the enligthened one because you think drinking the Koolaid with 4 percent less cyanide is prudent.

---

Well, that is, unless you have spent the last year building up an immunity to a glass of water with say 4% cyanide. Then tomorrow someone hands you a glass with 8% cyanide and says drink this for the jobs. It is obvious that since you have drank water with cyanide that you can drink it with more and cause NO ILL EFFECTS.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Drachen

Well, that is, unless you have spent the last year building up an immunity to a glass of water with say 4% cyanide. Then tomorrow someone hands you a glass with 8% cyanide and says drink this for the jobs. It is obvious that since you have drank water with cyanide that you can drink it with more and cause NO ILL EFFECTS.

---

wow!!! lol!!!

lets say i'm a level 60 wizard and i have special sheilds that deem me immortal!! :rollin:rollin:rollin:rollin:rollin

Are people still equating CO2 to plutonium and cyanide?


Your movement needs a better sales pitch. People have pretty good bullshit detectors. Well, some people do.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DarrinS

Are people still equating CO2 to plutonium and cyanide?


Your movement needs a better sales pitch. People have pretty good bullshit detectors. Well, some people do.

---

Don't kill my mojo, go fuck your opponents with more graphs.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DarrinS

Are people still equating CO2 to plutonium and cyanide?


Your movement needs a better sales pitch. People have pretty good bullshit detectors. Well, some people do.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DarrinS

Berkeley


Earth


Surface


Temperature


If you weren't so busy having tantrums, you'd notice the answers to several of your questions were easily gleaned from info on the graphs.

---

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencete...colleague.html

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The truth as opposed to Darrin's lie

But a report to be published today by the Global Warming Policy Foundation includes a graph of world average temperatures over the past ten years, drawn from the BEST project’s data and revealed on its website.

---

You should shut the fuck up about other peoples bullshit when you are a big fucking liar. Go compile the BEST data like the think tank you lied to us about did and hope it matches up.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FuzzyLumpkins

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencete...colleague.html

You should shut the fuck up about other peoples bullshit when you are a big fucking liar. Go compile the BEST data like the think tank you lied to us about did and hope it matches up.

---

lol chart wars

Youtube trump card >>>>> chart wars

Let it be known.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ignignokt

lol chart wars

---

I have no competing chart. He told us he got it from BEST when in reality he got it from a mailer that got it from a think tank who will not reveal its contributors but has a clear agenda in its press releases.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ignignokt

Don't kill my mojo, go fuck your opponents with more graphs.

---

Lol. I actually was on that side until they went all apocalyptic on me. Shitty "hockey stick" graphs based on sparse, proxies didn't help matters.