Right, here's my point which you strawmanned the fuck out of:
Go ahead and believe your government though. The Iraq war was definitely about liberating their population from a tyrant with WMDs.
Printable View
I don't necessarily believe that, but it would actually be justified.
North Korea IS run by a tyrannical dictator and DOES have WMDs, and if the USA wasn't lying then NK would clearly be TARGET NUMBER ONE.
The USA picked a really stupid lie to justify invasion of Iraq due to the existence of NK.
oh fine, lets argue semantics some more.
how can there be north texans if there isn't a north texas??!?!? WTF
There's the small matter that al Qaeda would have been less likely to pour into North Korea, so we could kill them like cockroaches, than they were to pour into Iraq...which they did by the 10's of thousands and of which we killed by the 10's of thousands.
There's a strategery here, try to think globally, greyforest.
Also, it appears North Korea is in for some type of change. Let's hope Dear Dick Leader's passing will open an opportunity for Democratic reforms in the peninsula.
what wonders they worked in Gaza and Iraq
I saw this on a CNN article response on Saturday. I couldn't find information anywhere else about it, but the response talked about Kim's death in past tense.
It wasn't the only justification but, if you're going to differentiate between North Korea and Iraq, it's a strong point.
That and not drawing China into a conflict while you're already fighting on one other front.
Then, of course, you start with all the justifications in the AUMF in Iraq that, alone, justified our action in Iraq.
I'll just be glad when we are out completely. Fucking thieves. It pretty much takes a strong dictator to run those backwards ass countries over there.
http://japanfocus.org/data/US_milita...world_2007.PNG
The sun never sets.
what's that dot in the Indian Ocean?