Is it me or does every Republican frontrunner seem to pull up lame due to some rather large skeletons in their respective closets (with the notable exception of Romney)?
Printable View
Is it me or does every Republican frontrunner seem to pull up lame due to some rather large skeletons in their respective closets (with the notable exception of Romney)?
If that had been published and distributed in The Barack Obama Newsletter and Obama didn't do anything about it, you might have a point.Quote:
Originally Posted by cheguevara
Yep, not even your golden god.Quote:
nobody is.
Actually he looked like shit in that interview. He fucked up.Quote:
he seems to be doing rather well
LOL thinking Ron Paul is in it to win it. he's in it to bring his Libertarian ideology to the spot light.
:lol thinking this is an actual democratic election
The coorporations have already decided with their #1 Obama, their plan B is Romney at #2
I support Paul cause he is in it to stir shit up and piss ppl off. And he is doing rather well at that :tu
LOL then he's lying to all his supporters who give him money.Quote:
Originally Posted by cheguevara
He's a crook.
And maybe a racist.
correctQuote:
Originally Posted by Chumpdumper
:toast
Duly noted for this and the future R. Paul threads you might start.Quote:
Originally Posted by cheguevara
Gotta agree with Chump. I think he needed to at least stand tall during that interview. He took his ball and ran off. Not good.
Your lame edit is duly notedQuote:
Originally Posted by cheguevara
Chump edited his first. :toastQuote:
Originally Posted by Blake
He should have just owned up to it and then stated those were NOT his words but then denounced them. Running scared won't work.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeChalupa
He's already done that. Ron Paul don't run scared, he's just tired of the bullshit.
Well then he's scared of bullshit.Quote:
Originally Posted by BigZak
:lmaoQuote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
That doesn't make your edit any less lame.Quote:
Originally Posted by cheguevara
If Paul really isn't trying to win, then he really is lying and swindling.
and Obama and Romney are not? :lmaoQuote:
Originally Posted by Blake
Obama and Romney may lie about other things, but both clearly want to win.Quote:
Originally Posted by cheguevara
Since you say Paul doesn't, there would be no reason to waste votes or money on that particular liar/swindler.
from all the liars/swindlers. I take the one who does not sell himself to the highest bidder.
BTW I said Paul does not EXPECT to win. Does he want to? sure. But from totally different reasons from Obama/Romney's personal grandeur reasons.
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/polit...at-1995/46548/
More on Ron Paul's newsletters.
Is Paul in it to win it or not?
Tell me why I should vote for Ron Paul.
Yep, that included what I read long ago.Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeChalupa
So tell us when Paul was lying, Che.
1992?
1996?
2001?
Now?
All of the above?
Be careful suggesting any videos containing Both facts and dramatic music to Chump. He will immediately discredit the facts because it has music :lolQuote:
Originally Posted by cheguevara
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
of course he lied. newsflash, all politicians lie. doesn't make him a racist :lol
Obama - lied
romney - lied
gingrich - lied
Cain - lied
Dubya - lied
Clinton - lied
Bush Sr - lied
Reagan - lied
Carter - lied
Nixon - lied
should I keep going?
Ron Paul is still best of the bunch cause he doesn't bend over backwards for an extra vote. He sticks to his guns.
He didn't stick to his guns regarding his newsletter. That could make him a racist.Quote:
Originally Posted by cheguevara
And you already said he's a crook.
Probably because that would be a long, frivolous, time-consuming process for a man who's already doing the whole "running for president" thing.Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
I was refering to his policies. :rolleyesQuote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper