Wall St and SuperPACs flood the lying Willard Gecko with $100Ms and trash JimmyRicky with nastiest attack ads. JimmyRicky won't have a chance. Repug politics is filthier, stinkier than the worst venereal diseases.
Printable View
Wall St and SuperPACs flood the lying Willard Gecko with $100Ms and trash JimmyRicky with nastiest attack ads. JimmyRicky won't have a chance. Repug politics is filthier, stinkier than the worst venereal diseases.
:lol Yes I do, I guess you didn't understand my sarcasmQuote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
Often difficult to tell on this board.Quote:
Originally Posted by SA210
You know what? Call me crazy, but watching the video I believe him. It didn't sound like "blah" but it sounds even less like "black." It sounds like he mixed up "people's" and "lives" like everyone sometimes does with two words, and it came out something like "pbligh".Quote:
Originally Posted by Winehole23
I actually believe him too.
Only Bachmann would be that stupid.
OTOH, the number of black Republicans who voted in the last caucus: 0.
lol @ the journalist scribbling furiously after he said it though.
after listening, I agreeQuote:
Originally Posted by Spurminator
Well, I'm really glad that he wants to give the Blah People a chance to get off welfare. He certainly has my vote.
InSaneTorum won, 20 votes for Gecko were wrong.
Iowa Caucus 2012 Results: Vote-Counter Says Mistake Gave Mitt Romney 20 Extra Votes [UPDATED]
Former U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum said he was "not surprised to hear" that the vote total for ex-Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney may have been overcounted by 20 in the final tally of Iowa caucus-goers, but both he and his campaign were declining to weigh in on the story that broke Thursday night.
Speaking to a large gathering of New Hampshire voters at Windham High School, the Pennsylvania Republican said he was unaware that a local television station in Iowa had aired a report on a potential vote count discrepancy that would alter the winner of the caucus two days ago.
The station, KCCI, reported that in Appanoose County, a vote-counter had discovered an inconsistency between the number of the 50 votes he had monitored and what the Republican Party of Iowa had recorded.
"When Mitt Romney won Iowa by eight votes and I've got a 20-vote discrepancy here, that right there says Rick Santorum won Iowa," said the vote-counter, Edward True, 28. "Not Mitt Romney."
A spokeswoman with the Iowa Republican Party did not immediately address True's assertion, but stressed that he was not a precinct captain and was not authorized to discuss the vote. The 20-vote discrepancy remained, late Thursday, unconfirmed.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...tml?view=print
====
This changes everything! :lol
If you wish you believe so.Quote:
Originally Posted by boutons_deux
Iowa changes nothing, no matter who won/wins, it's irrelevant except to TV companies selling ads.
The self-annointed Jesus candidate announces himself:Quote:
Originally Posted by ChumpDumper
“My answer to that was, we always need a Jesus candidate,” Santorum, who is a Catholic, recalled.
“I don’t mean that in saying we need a Jesus candidate, someone who’s a Christian, but we need someone who believes in something more than themselves, some higher power, some god,” he added.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/01/0...(The+Raw+Story)
==
Yep, we need a Jesus candidate, who, like just Jesus, hates queers, lesbos, trannies, Muslims
... as long as it's the same god he worships, no doubt.Quote:
Originally Posted by boutons_deux
yep, MUST BE the Christian God, not any Hindu, Jewish, Muslim gods allowed.
Quote:
Caucus night was chaotic in many places, with hundreds of voters, candidates showing up and the throngs of media who followed. The world's eyes were on Iowa. But in the quiet town of Moulton, Appanoose County, a caucus of 53 people may just blow up the results.
Edward True, 28, of Moulton, said he helped count the votes and jotted the results down on a piece of paper to post to his Facebook page. He said when he checked to make sure the Republican Party of Iowa got the count right, he said he was shocked to find they hadn't."When Mitt Romney won Iowa by eight votes and I've got a 20-vote discrepancy here, that right there says Rick Santorum won Iowa," True said. "Not Mitt Romney."
Quote:
Appanoose County Republican Chairman Lyle Brinegar said Friday that his records indicate Romney did indeed only receive 2 votes in True's precinct. He told KCCI the county's paperwork is in order and he's confident the mistake will be corrected before the vote is certified.
Precinct caucus chair, Tony Seibert also said yes, Mitt Romney only received two votes in his precinct, not the 22 the GOP is reporting.
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics...iowa-caucuses/Quote:
Iowa GOP Chairman Matt Strawn declined to comment on the specific precinct vote total, but said in an interview with ABC News that “the result of Appanoose will not change the outcome of Tuesday’s vote.”
Santorum wins, sort of:
http://caucuses.desmoinesregister.co...nt-unresolved/Quote:
THE RESULTS: Santorum finished ahead by 34 votes
MISSING DATA: 8 precincts’ numbers will never be certified
PARTY VERDICT: GOP official says, ‘It’s a split decision’ Rick Santorum – Final total: 29,839 Change: -168
Mitt Romney – Final total: 29,805 Change: -210
It’s a tie for the ages.
There are too many holes in the certified totals from the Iowa caucuses to know for certain who won, but Rick Santorum wound up with a 34-vote advantage.
Not that it matters.
hurts Romney, helps Gingrich
even if it is of no consequence, it is history. Santorum won, but Romney got to wear the laurels.